[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2226) move contrib/snowball to contrib/analyzers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2226: -- Attachment: LUCENE-2226-javadocs.patch Here the fix for the javadocs-all target after hudson b

RE: Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #1070

I fixed this in revision: 901576 (build.xml was referencing missing contrib and also corrected package name of snowball package) - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Apache Hudson Server [mail

Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #1070

See Changes: [rmuir] LUCENE-2226: move contrib/snowball to contrib/analyzers -- [...truncated 12857 lines...] clover: compile-core: jar-core: [jar] Building jar:

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2226) move contrib/snowball to contrib/analyzers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2226. - Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 901505. > move contrib/snowball to contrib/analyzers > ---

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-1488) multilingual analyzer based on icu

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12803061#action_12803061 ] Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-1488 at 1/20/10 11:46 PM: -

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1488) multilingual analyzer based on icu

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12803061#action_12803061 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1488: - Hi Vilay, this is not intentional to split them

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1488) multilingual analyzer based on icu

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12803058#action_12803058 ] Vilaythong Southavilay commented on LUCENE-1488: I tested Lao numbers. It

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2229) SimpleSpanFragmenter fails to start a new fragment

SimpleSpanFragmenter fails to start a new fragment -- Key: LUCENE-2229 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2229 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Components: contri

Re: Intel I7 benchmark request.

> Interested in some Core i5 benchmarks? Sure, add them to the JIRA issue if you can, please. > I just ran the benchmark locally on latest JDK 6 and it was slightly better > than the I7 results you posted which made me wonder.. Well, like I said -- they may depend on the architecture of the comp

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2221) Micro-benchmarks for ntz and pop (BitUtils) operations.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802972#action_12802972 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2221: -- bq. Results from Intel I7 - an improvement of

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2228) AES Encrypted Directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jay Mundrawala updated LUCENE-2228: --- Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New]) > AES Encrypted Directory >

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2228) AES Encrypted Directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jay Mundrawala updated LUCENE-2228: --- Attachment: LUCENE-2228.patch > AES Encrypted Directory > --- > >

Re: Intel I7 benchmark request.

Interested in some Core i5 benchmarks? I just ran the benchmark locally on latest JDK 6 and it was slightly better than the I7 results you posted which made me wonder.. - Cristian Vat On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 21:06, Dawid Weiss wrote: > > FYI, the AMD Phenom also has the POPCNT instruction. > >

Re: Intel I7 benchmark request.

> FYI, the AMD Phenom also has the POPCNT instruction. Don't have access to a computer with this one either. Seems like I need to invest in hardware a bit. I have found a person with I7 though -- the results are attached to the JIRA issue, about 20% speedup. Dawid ---

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2221) Micro-benchmarks for ntz and pop (BitUtils) operations.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802927#action_12802927 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-2221: - Results from Intel I7 -- an improvement of abou

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2228) AES Encrypted Directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802915#action_12802915 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2228: This looks cool! Can you change

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2228) AES Encrypted Directory

AES Encrypted Directory --- Key: LUCENE-2228 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2228 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: New Feature Components: Store Affects Versions: 3.1 Reporter

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2228) AES Encrypted Directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jay Mundrawala updated LUCENE-2228: --- Attachment: lucene-encryption.tar.gz > AES Encrypted Directory > --- > >

Re: Intel I7 benchmark request.

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote: > Is there anyone with access to an Intel I7-machine? I'd be curious > what the results of this benchmark are, given the new JVM intrinsics > introduced in HotSpot 1.7: FYI, the AMD Phenom also has the POPCNT instruction. -Yonik http://www.luc

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1990) Add unsigned packed int impls in oal.util

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802903#action_12802903 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1990: -- Paul: In the aligned case, and with the right

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2221) Micro-benchmarks for ntz and pop (BitUtils) operations.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802900#action_12802900 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-2221: - I do have a bunch of dinosaur-age computers, su

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1990) Add unsigned packed int impls in oal.util

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802888#action_12802888 ] Toke Eskildsen commented on LUCENE-1990: {quote} Toke: Introducing yet another lev

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-2221) Micro-benchmarks for ntz and pop (BitUtils) operations.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802887#action_12802887 ] Yonik Seeley edited comment on LUCENE-2221 at 1/20/10 4:36 PM: -

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2221) Micro-benchmarks for ntz and pop (BitUtils) operations.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802887#action_12802887 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2221: -- If you only tested 32 bit on the P4, that can

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1990) Add unsigned packed int impls in oal.util

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802885#action_12802885 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1990: -- bq. In the aligned case, and with the right b

Intel I7 benchmark request.

Hi there, Is there anyone with access to an Intel I7-machine? I'd be curious what the results of this benchmark are, given the new JVM intrinsics introduced in HotSpot 1.7: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221 There is an executable JAR file attached to the issue. Run with (must be

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1990) Add unsigned packed int impls in oal.util

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802877#action_12802877 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1990: -- {quote} | Using aligned ints would save the s

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1990) Add unsigned packed int impls in oal.util

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802875#action_12802875 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1990: -- For the record: on the flex branch I just saw

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1990) Add unsigned packed int impls in oal.util

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802854#action_12802854 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1990: -- bq. Using aligned ints would save the shiftin

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12801813#action_12801813 ] Renaud Delbru edited comment on LUCENE-1410 at 1/20/10 2:41 PM:

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-2217) SortedVIntList allocation should use ArrayUtils.getNextSize()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802850#action_12802850 ] Paul Elschot edited comment on LUCENE-2217 at 1/20/10 2:40 PM: -

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2217) SortedVIntList allocation should use ArrayUtils.getNextSize()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802850#action_12802850 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-2217: -- Since I missed the second one in IndexInput I

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2152) Abstract Spatial distance filtering process and supported field formats

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Male updated LUCENE-2152: --- Attachment: LUCENE-2152-alt.patch Attaching a new patch based on the above discussion. This patch i

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2217) SortedVIntList allocation should use ArrayUtils.getNextSize()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2217: --- Attachment: LUCENE-2217.patch Small tweaks on the last patch, also adding ArrayUtil.

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1990) Add unsigned packed int impls in oal.util

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802829#action_12802829 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1990: -- I've made a remark at LUCENE-1410 (a first at

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2221) Micro-benchmarks for ntz and pop (BitUtils) operations.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-2221: Attachment: lucene-bitset-benchmarks.zip Benchmarks, source code. > Micro-benchmarks for ntz and

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2221) Micro-benchmarks for ntz and pop (BitUtils) operations.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802823#action_12802823 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-2221: - I wrote a set of micro-benchmarks comparing {{p

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2221) Micro-benchmarks for ntz and pop (BitUtils) operations.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-2221: Attachment: benchmark.jar Executable Java JAR with benchmarking code for anybody that wishes to re

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2221) Micro-benchmarks for ntz and pop (BitUtils) operations.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-2221: Attachment: benchmarks.txt Benchmark results for array operations and iterators comparing the perf

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2205) Rework of the TermInfosReader class to remove the Terms[], TermInfos[], and the index pointer long[] and create a more memory efficient data structure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802801#action_12802801 ] Aaron McCurry commented on LUCENE-2205: --- Yes Sent from my iPhone On Jan 20, 2010,

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2217) SortedVIntList allocation should use ArrayUtils.getNextSize()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-2217: - Attachment: LUCENE-2217.patch Patch of 20 Jan also includes use of ArrayUtil.getNextSize() for a

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2205) Rework of the TermInfosReader class to remove the Terms[], TermInfos[], and the index pointer long[] and create a more memory efficient data structure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802787#action_12802787 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2205: Aaron, are you also working on a

Re: NRT and IndexSearcher performance

+1 Mike On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Separate to this discussion: > We should fix the JavaDocs of IndexSearcher, that it should explain, that > only the instances using Directory are costly. Creating a new IndexSearcher > around an IndexReader is a neglectible cost,

Re: NRT and IndexSearcher performance

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:04 PM, jchang wrote: > > The javadocs for IndexSearcher in Lucene 3.0.0 read: "For performance > reasons it is recommended to open only one IndexSearcher and use it for all > of your searches." As Uwe pointed out, creating an IndexSearcher from an already created IndexR

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1990) Add unsigned packed int impls in oal.util

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802780#action_12802780 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1990: bq.Introducing yet another level

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2186) First cut at column-stride fields (index values storage)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2186: --- Attachment: mem.py I did a RAM cost estimation of FieldCache vs the approach in this

Re: [Lucene-java Wiki] Update of "PoweredBy" by ChristianShirts

Are we being spammed here? goldenpunter.com doesn't have a search box on the main page, nor do I even see a "search" link. Erik On Jan 19, 2010, at 10:40 PM, Apache Wiki wrote: Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Lucene-java Wiki" for change no

RE: NRT and IndexSearcher performance

Separate to this discussion: We should fix the JavaDocs of IndexSearcher, that it should explain, that only the instances using Directory are costly. Creating a new IndexSearcher around an IndexReader is a neglectible cost, the important info is: "Do not recreate the IR for each search". Wrappin