Hi all,
I got three positive votes from:
- Andi Vajda
- Mike McCandless
- Ted Dunning
I will copy the release artifacts to the apache dist server this evening and
let the mirroring start. During that time I will prepare the website changes
and will announce the release as planned.
-
Uwe Sc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2282:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2282.patch
Updated TestFileSwitchDirectory to use the constants instead of hard c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837624#action_12837624
]
Shai Erera edited comment on LUCENE-2282 at 2/24/10 4:37 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837624#action_12837624
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2282:
bq. The thing is, I really don't understand what
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837603#action_12837603
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2167:
-
bq. Clearly, much of this is an opinion, so I f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shyamal Prasad updated LUCENE-2167:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2167.patch
Hi Robert,
It's been a while but I finally got around to wor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837499#action_12837499
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-2282:
-
> Any application that extends IW, or p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837467#action_12837467
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2279:
-
in my opinion the issue states one of my bigges
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837465#action_12837465
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2279:
-
I don't consider this as an issue at al
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2279:
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> eliminate pathological performance on StopFilter when usin
Possible Memory Leak in StoredFieldsWriter
--
Key: LUCENE-2283
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2283
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.4.1
Repo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2282:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2282.patch
Forgot to tag IFN as @lucene.internal
> Expose IndexFileNames as publ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837455#action_12837455
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2282:
bq. What are the applications that we are trying
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2282:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2282.patch
Patch provides:
* IFN constants and methods as public
* segmentFileNam
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837446#action_12837446
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-2282:
-
It seems to me that identifying only co
Expose IndexFileNames as public, and make use of its methods in the code
Key: LUCENE-2282
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2282
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837438#action_12837438
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2111:
-
ok, i ditched UTF8 result entirely, committed i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837410#action_12837410
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2279:
-
reusableTokenStream() is called again for each
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837373#action_12837373
]
thushara wijeratna commented on LUCENE-2279:
isn't the resusableTokenStream cr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837359#action_12837359
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2111:
Patch looks good Robert! Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2111:
Attachment: LUCENE-2111_bytesRef.patch
here is a rough patch, that merges BytesRef/UnicodeUtil
* a
+1 to release. I used each version's binary release to build & search a
5M wikipedia index.
Search performance is the same for TermQuery with both releases, but
for PhraseQuery (at least the 3 simple 2-word phrases I tested) was
~9% faster (20.49 QPS -> 22.29 QPS). Not sure why... but it's movin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2281:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.0.2
> Add doBeforeFlush to IndexWriter
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2281:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.1)
Woops, not on 3.0.1 (likely).
> Add doBeforeFlush t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2281.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0.1
Thanks Shai!
> Add doBeforeFlush to
Hi all,
I also checked the release artifacts in my projects and can conclude, that the
3.0.1 version works correctly for me. 2.9.x is no longer in use here. But both
-src artifact files build and test correctly. Signatures are fine and also
hashes.
So a non-counting +1 from me (non-PMC).
Uwe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-2281:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Add doBeforeFlush to IndexWriter
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837284#action_12837284
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2281:
Patch looks good... thanks Shai!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Toke Eskildsen updated LUCENE-1990:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1990-te20100223.patch
I've renamed most of the classes to short form, as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2281:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2281.patch
* Added doBeforeFlush + call to it in doFlushInternal
* Changed doAfte
Add doBeforeFlush to IndexWriter
Key: LUCENE-2281
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2281
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Index
Reporter: Shai E
on it !
Shai
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> +1 to both adding doAfterFlush and making the two methods protected.
> Patch?
>
> Mike
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can we add to IW a doBeforeFlush(
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Renaud Delbru updated LUCENE-1410:
--
Attachment: for-summary.txt
File containing a summary of the results for each bit frame, based
+1 to both adding doAfterFlush and making the two methods protected. Patch?
Mike
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can we add to IW a doBeforeFlush(), similar to doAfterFlush(), which will
> get called before flush actually happens (i.e., at the beginning of
> flush()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837231#action_12837231
]
Renaud Delbru commented on LUCENE-1410:
---
I am reporting here some experiments I perf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837213#action_12837213
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on LUCENE-2278:
I'll commit in a few days.
> FastVectorH
ok great !
I'll create an issue and work out a patch.
Shai
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> > I don't think performance is the issue here, but rather correctness.
> Someone
> > cannot
Hi,
Can we add to IW a doBeforeFlush(), similar to doAfterFlush(), which will
get called before flush actually happens (i.e., at the beginning of
flush())? IW.flush() is final and so I cannot override it, but I do take
advantage of doAfterFlush(). I need though a way to execute some code before
th
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> I don't think performance is the issue here, but rather correctness. Someone
> cannot just ask filename.endsWith(DELETION_EXT) as files like "file1del"
> would match as well. So whenever you make such check, you need to add ".".
> Again, not per
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837204#action_12837204
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2280:
Are you sure you're using a stock
I don't think performance is the issue here, but rather correctness. Someone
cannot just ask filename.endsWith(DELETION_EXT) as files like "file1del"
would match as well. So whenever you make such check, you need to add ".".
Again, not performance, but correctness.
If we make it public, then we ca
Sigh... yes, better to turn these into Jira issues in general.
We could make the change under Version? (Change to true, starting in 3.1).
Or maybe not make the change. If set to true, we use pct deletion on
a segment to reduce its perceived size when selecting merges, which
generally causes seg
Well, there are two issues:
* We don't always call IFN.segmentFileName -- often we simply
concatenate strings directly throughout the sources.
* Should the extensions include '.' or not?
I'd really like to fix the first issue. If we do that, then there's
only 1 place that performs string co
But segmentFileName performs the concatenation internally:
static String segmentFileName(String segmentName, String ext) {
return segmentName + "." + ext;
}
So that would not avoid anything right?
And still, if someone needs to know whether a certain file is a core Lucene
file or his own a
This class makes me somewhat nervous, with the changes coming in flex,
because the extensions are no longer static but rather a function of
the particular codec you're using in the index. I've changed some of
the constants accordingly (on flex).
Still, I think it's OK to make it public (flex has
45 matches
Mail list logo
