Hi Robert,
On 11/18/2009 at 7:16 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
Looking at the collation support, we could maybe improve
IndexableBinaryStringTools by using char[]/byte[] with offset and
length. The existing ByteBuffer/CharBuffer methods could stay, they are
consistent with Charset api and are not
Steven, do you still have a test setup to measure collation key generation
performance with Lucene?
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu wrote:
Hi Robert,
On 11/18/2009 at 7:16 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
Looking at the collation support, we could maybe improve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12780129#action_12780129
]
DM Smith commented on LUCENE-1799:
--
The sample code is probably what is on this page,
Hi Robert,
Ack, actually two days ago I updated my Lucene trunk checkout and removed that
code, thinking its utility had evaporated!
But maybe IntelliJ will save my bacon in its local history cache. (Praise
IntelliJ!) I'll check tonight when I get home.
Steve
On 11/19/2009 at 10:16 AM,
doh! well if you have it, that will be very handy for verification.
I'll create a separate issue for this shortly, maybe you can review the
patch
Thanks,
Robert
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu wrote:
Hi Robert,
Ack, actually two days ago I updated my Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779442#action_12779442
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1799:
-
Earwin, if implemented as a directory, we lose
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779510#action_12779510
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1799:
-
Earwin, if implemented as a directory,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779513#action_12779513
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1799:
-
bq. Waiting for flexible indexing, hoping it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779571#action_12779571
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1799:
The flex API will let you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779577#action_12779577
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1799:
-
bq. The flex API will let you completely
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779576#action_12779576
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1799:
-
pretty simple though, isnt it? Just pull the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779602#action_12779602
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1799:
-
bq. as far as the encoding itself,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779621#action_12779621
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1799:
-
bq. ICU's API requires to use ByteBuffer and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779629#action_12779629
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1799:
-
Earwin, i do not really like this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779682#action_12779682
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1799:
-
bq. but then i guess we have to deal
btw, does anyone have a guess at how expensive this
ByteBuffer/CharBuffer.wrap() is?
Looking at the collation support, we could maybe improve
IndexableBinaryStringTools by using char[]/byte[] with offset and length.
The existing ByteBuffer/CharBuffer methods could stay, they are consistent
with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12741868#action_12741868
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1799:
-
I think right now this can be
17 matches
Mail list logo
