Thanks you all. Do you think such a feature will ever be included in
Lucene "standard"?
MC
On 12/15/07, Timo Nentwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 14 December 2007 16:56:07 Sean Timm wrote:
> > See LUCENE-997
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997
>
> I actually have had th
On Friday 14 December 2007 16:56:07 Sean Timm wrote:
> See LUCENE-997
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997
I actually have had this problem (ran into a synchronized{} bottleneck in
FSDirectory) and "fixed" it by introducing a pool of Searchers (each
allocates memory and each holds
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997
On Dec 14, 2007, at 2:07 AM, Moreno Carullo wrote:
Hi all,
I'm going to implement a way to start a search on Lucene with a user-
defined
timeout.
This is really useful when you have to deal with very strict SLA,
and for
what I have seen
See LUCENE-997
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997
-Sean
Moreno Carullo wrote:
Hi all,
I'm going to implement a way to start a search on Lucene with a user-defined
timeout.
This is really useful when you have to deal with very strict SLA, and for
what I have seen from the source co
Hi all,
I'm going to implement a way to start a search on Lucene with a user-defined
timeout.
This is really useful when you have to deal with very strict SLA, and for
what I have seen from the source code, this feature is still missing.
Has anyone start doing something similar?
Does my future pat
