ent: Monday, December 11, 2006 8:46:15 PM
Subject: Re: Exposing IndexReader commit()
On 12/11/06, robert engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the high-level case is that if the index is shared, you want
> the other readers to be able to see the updated deletes if they are
> no
On 12/11/06, robert engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the high-level case is that if the index is shared, you want
the other readers to be able to see the updated deletes if they are
notified to reread the index (using something like reopen).
It still seems like an odd usecase for one t
I think the high-level case is that if the index is shared, you want
the other readers to be able to see the updated deletes if they are
notified to reread the index (using something like reopen).
On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 12/11/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECT
On 12/11/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I believe (another colleague did work around this) the use case is the desire
to flush the deletes without having to close the reader and reopen it, which is
expensive because of FieldCache population.
Yes, but that doesn't answer *why*
o: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 2:51:14 PM
Subject: Re: Exposing IndexReader commit()
Attached is the current version of reopen().
On Dec 11, 2006, at 1:28 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Does anyone have any thoughts or feelings about this?
There is also Ro
: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 3:26:35 PM
Subject: Re: Exposing IndexReader commit()
Hi Otis,
What is your real usecase here? Is it to make sure deletes are
flushed in the event of a crash? Otherwise I don't see the problem
with delaying deletes.
Hi Otis,
What is your real usecase here? Is it to make sure deletes are
flushed in the event of a crash? Otherwise I don't see the problem
with delaying deletes.
-Yonik
http://incubator.apache.org/solr Solr, the open-source Lucene search server
On 12/4/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eh, didn't make it. JIRA?
Thanks,
Otis
- Original Message
From: robert engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 2:51:14 PM
Subject: Re: Exposing IndexReader commit()
Attached is the current version of reopen().
On Dec 11,
Attached is the current version of reopen().
On Dec 11, 2006, at 1:28 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Does anyone have any thoughts or feelings about this?
There is also Robert Engels IndexReader.reopen():
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.devel/9082/
match=reopen
(I could
Does anyone have any thoughts or feelings about this?
There is also Robert Engels IndexReader.reopen():
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.devel/9082/match=reopen
(I couldn't find this in JIRA - is it sharable?)
Thanks,
Otis
- Original Message
From: Otis Gospodnetic
10 matches
Mail list logo
