Re: site javadocs link broken

2007-12-28 Thread Doron Cohen
On Dec 28, 2007 5:33 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 28, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: > > Oh I see, what confused me is that the section and the > > page have almost identical names. Any objection to renaming > > the section to "Javadocs for Official Releases"? > >

Re: site javadocs link broken

2007-12-28 Thread Doron Cohen
Hi Steve, thanks, I missed that thread, now I can see it. Thanks, Doron On Dec 28, 2007 5:17 PM, Steven A Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Doron, > > On 12/28/2007 at 8:33 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: > > It is the trunk Javadocs that are missing for me - I don't see > > the link to Hudson. > [...]

Re: site javadocs link broken

2007-12-28 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Dec 28, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: On Dec 28, 2007 4:17 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's auto-generated by Forrest, same as on all the other pages. Is kind of silly though, when there is only 1 section. Oh I see, what confused me is that the section and t

RE: site javadocs link broken

2007-12-28 Thread Steven A Rowe
Hi Doron, On 12/28/2007 at 8:33 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: > It is the trunk Javadocs that are missing for me - I don't see > the link to Hudson. [...] > In what page do you see a link to > http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightly/javadoc/index.html?

Re: site javadocs link broken

2007-12-28 Thread Doron Cohen
On Dec 28, 2007 4:17 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's auto-generated by Forrest, same as on all the other pages. Is > kind of silly though, when there is only 1 section. Oh I see, what confused me is that the section and the page have almost identical names. Any objection

Re: site javadocs link broken

2007-12-28 Thread Grant Ingersoll
That's auto-generated by Forrest, same as on all the other pages. Is kind of silly though, when there is only 1 section. -Grant On Dec 28, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: Thanks Grant, I see it now, totally missed that thread. Is there a reason to keep the self "javadocs" link in http

Re: site javadocs link broken

2007-12-28 Thread Doron Cohen
Thanks Grant, I see it now, totally missed that thread. Is there a reason to keep the self "javadocs" link in http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/javadocs.html ? On Dec 28, 2007 3:54 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/55471?se

Re: site javadocs link broken

2007-12-28 Thread Grant Ingersoll
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/55471?search_string=javadocs;#55471 On Dec 28, 2007, at 8:33 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: Hi Steven, It is the trunk Javadocs that are missing for me - I don't see the link to Hudson. Going to the main project page - http://lucene.apache.org/ja

Re: site javadocs link broken

2007-12-28 Thread Doron Cohen
Hi Steven, It is the trunk Javadocs that are missing for me - I don't see the link to Hudson. Going to the main project page - http://lucene.apache.org/java is redirecting to - http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/index.html and then after navigating to - Documentation --> Javadocs there are 4 link

RE: site javadocs link broken

2007-12-27 Thread Steven A Rowe
Hi Doron, All of these worked for me when I clicked on them just now from the site: http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_2_0/api/index.html http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_1_0/api/index.html http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_0_0/api/index.html http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightl