: > > Should This HACK be commited, or is it better to leave explanations for
: > > SpanNear queries broken untill someone has the confidence to fix
LUCENE-569?
: > I think it would be all right as long as you make a note of it on the
: > 569 issue and in the code so that people know why the cha
On Monday 19 June 2006 21:07, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> Chris Hostetter wrote:
> > 2) SpanScorer.explain HACK fix
> >
> > NearSpans.skipTo is broken (see LUCENE-569). This apparently doesn't
> > affect too many people (or if it does, they haven't been filing bugs about
> > it) but it does make
Chris Hostetter wrote:
2) SpanScorer.explain HACK fix
NearSpans.skipTo is broken (see LUCENE-569). This apparently doesn't
affect too many people (or if it does, they haven't been filing bugs about
it) but it does make SpanScorer.explain lie. I don't understand
SpanQueries enough to feel co
On 6/15/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1) Modifying existing search tests to implicitly check explain
LUCENE-557-modify-existing-tests.patch modifies (almost) every core test I
could find that used an IndexSearcher to use a modified IndexSearcher that
implicitly tests explanation
Regarding "search vs explain - score discrepancies"...
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-557
...I got sidetracked by a pesky anoyance called "work" for a little while,
but I'm looking at this again, and I'd like to commit some varient of the
patches I added to that bug -- the notabl
