[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2388) the unversioned site points to a dead trunk

outdated references on the site or wiki please correct them > the unversioned site points to a dead trunk > --- > > Key: LUCENE-2388 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2388 > Proj

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2388) the unversioned site points to a dead trunk

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2388: Attachment: LUCENE-2388_solr.patch attached is a patch to fix the references on the solr site

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2388) the unversioned site points to a dead trunk

ke to commit this and make a similar patch for solr, which has the same problem. > the unversioned site points to a dead trunk > --- > > Key: LUCENE-2388 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2388 &

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2388) the unversioned site points to a dead trunk

the unversioned site points to a dead trunk --- Key: LUCENE-2388 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2388 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Components: Website

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-860) site should call project "Lucene Java", not just "Lucene"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated LUCENE-860: --- Attachment: LUCENE-860-2.patch > site should call project "Lucene Java", not

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-860) site should call project "Lucene Java", not just "Lucene"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated LUCENE-860: --- Attachment: LUCENE-860-1.patch updated patch that also includes doc site level changes > s

RE: Atlassian Clover Site License for Apache

http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com] > Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 11:09 AM > To: Nicholas Muldoon > Cc: java-dev@lucene.apache.org; Nick Pellow; j...@biccard.com > Subject: Re

Re: Atlassian Clover Site License for Apache

tters & contributors are aware -- does anyone know the best place (wiki, mailing list) in Apache to publicize this? Mike On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Nicholas Muldoon wrote: > Hi, > > Atlassian are excited to be presenting Apache with a site license for Clover > 2.6. > >

Re: svn commit: r888605 - in /lucene/java/site: docs/irc.html src/documentation/content/xdocs/irc.xml

yeah :) svn add rules! thanks mike On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:33 PM, wrote: > Author: mikemccand > Date: Tue Dec  8 22:33:48 2009 > New Revision: 888605 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=888605&view=rev > Log: > add irc channel to website > > Added: >

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-860) site should call project "Lucene Java", not just "Lucene"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated LUCENE-860: --- Fix Version/s: 3.1 > site should call project "Lucene Java", not

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-860) site should call project "Lucene Java", not just "Lucene"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller reassigned LUCENE-860: -- Assignee: Mark Miller > site should call project "Lucene Java", not

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-860) site should call project "Lucene Java", not just "Lucene"

cene Java than I am by Lucene :) But, I'll commit this soon if no one has any objections. > site should call project "Lucene Java", not just "Lucene" > - > > Key: LUCENE-860 >

RE: svn commit: r880744 - in /lucene/java/trunk: CHANGES.txt src/site/changes/changes2html.pl

@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: RE: svn commit: r880744 - in /lucene/java/trunk: CHANGES.txt > > src/site/changes/changes2html.pl > > > > Yeah, ... works to handle the bulleted lists (though it > > also adds ... tags -> monospaced font, which is not ideal). >

RE: svn commit: r880744 - in /lucene/java/trunk: CHANGES.txt src/site/changes/changes2html.pl

to:sar...@syr.edu] > Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 2:47 PM > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: svn commit: r880744 - in /lucene/java/trunk: CHANGES.txt > src/site/changes/changes2html.pl > > Yeah, ... works to handle the bulleted lists (though it also > adds ... tags -

RE: svn commit: r880744 - in /lucene/java/trunk: CHANGES.txt src/site/changes/changes2html.pl

13:35:20 2009 > New Revision: 880744 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=880744&view=rev > Log: > Better changes.txt list. > > Modified: > lucene/java/trunk/CHANGES.txt > lucene/java/trunk/src/site/changes/changes2html.pl > > Modif

RE: svn commit: r829818 - in /lucene/java/branches/lucene_2_9: ./ docs/ docs/lucene-contrib/ docs/skin/images/ src/site/changes/ src/site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/

he.org [mailto:mikemcc...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 3:59 PM > To: java-comm...@lucene.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r829818 - in /lucene/java/branches/lucene_2_9: ./ > docs/ docs/lucene-contrib/ docs/skin/images/ src/site/changes/ > src/site/src/documentation/conte

Re: svn commit: r817286 - /lucene/java/site/docs/doap.rdf

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > I actually almost sent an email questioning it, but the day is supposed > to be an estimate, so I figure its likely to be off a day or two anyway. +1, don't worry about it. Need to wait for mirrors to sync anyway, so it's often the day after

Re: svn commit: r817286 - /lucene/java/site/docs/doap.rdf

Steven A Rowe wrote: > Mark Miller wrote: > >> >> >> +Lucene 2.9.0 >> +2009-09-23 >> +2.9.0 >> + >> > > Stupid question from the peanut gallery: > > Doesn't a VOTE require 3 days? I ask because (3 + 2009-09-21) = 2009-09-24, > not -23. > > Steve

RE: svn commit: r817286 - /lucene/java/site/docs/doap.rdf

Mark Miller wrote: > > > +Lucene 2.9.0 > +2009-09-23 > +2.9.0 > + Stupid question from the peanut gallery: Doesn't a VOTE require 3 days? I ask because (3 + 2009-09-21) = 2009-09-24, not -23. Steve

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1897) Links to javadoc from the site pages do not work in the src dist because it does not include the javadoc under docs.

f 2.9 (didn't plan/think it would be done for 2.9 in the first place actually) > Links to javadoc from the site pages do not work in the src dist because it > does not include the ja

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1897) Links to javadoc from the site pages do not work in the src dist because it does not include the javadoc under docs.

perated the version specific docs from the site docs) > Links to javadoc from the site pages do not work in the src dist because it > does not include the javadoc under docs. >

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-1897) Links to javadoc from the site pages do not work in the src dist because it does not include the javadoc under docs.

and nothing is there, I would personally find that a bit confusing. But it wouldnt bother me too much I guess. But if I open the site HTML in the folder docs, and most of the links are broken cause they point to javadoc - that seems broken to me. Whether we want to fix it or not, I don't know

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-1897) Links to javadoc from the site pages do not work in the src dist because it does not include the javadoc under docs.

and nothing is there, I would personally find that a bit confusing. But it wouldnt bother me too much I guess. But if I open the site HTML in the folder docs, and most of the links are broken cause they point to javadoc - that seems broken to me. Whether we want to fix it or not, I don't know

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1897) Links to javadoc from the site pages do not work in the src dist because it does not include the javadoc under docs.

bit confusing. But it wouldnt bother me too much I guess. But if I open the site HTML in the folder docs, and most of the links are broken cause they point to javadoc - that seems broken to me. Whether we want to fix it or not, I don't know and I don't have a real suggestion - but ce

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1897) Links to javadoc from the site pages do not work in the src dist because it does not include the javadoc under docs.

tifacts to be where they expect. as long as running "ant javadoc" in a source release puts the javadocs in the right spot so that the linkss start working, we're doing the right thing. > Links to javadoc from the site pages do not work in the src dist because it

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1897) Links to javadoc from the site pages do not work in the src dist because it does not include the javadoc under docs.

with - unless we decide to include the expanded javadocs in src release. I'm not going to worry about it myself for this release. > Links to javadoc from the site pages do not work in the src dist because it > does not include the jav

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1897) Links to javadoc from the site pages do not work in the src dist because it does not include the javadoc under docs.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1897: Priority: Minor (was: Major) > Links to javadoc from the site pages do not work in the src d

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1897) Links to javadoc from the site pages do not work in the src dist because it does not include the javadoc under docs.

Links to javadoc from the site pages do not work in the src dist because it does not include the javadoc under docs. Key: LUCENE-1897 URL: https

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1874) Further updates to the site scoring page

tes to the site scoring page > > > Key: LUCENE-1874 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1874 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Mark Mill

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1873) Update site lucene-sandbox page

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12751991#action_12751991 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1873: - Thanks Steve! > Update site lucene-

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1873) Update site lucene-sandbox page

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-1873. - Resolution: Fixed Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New]) > Update s

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1873) Update site lucene-sandbox page

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1873: Attachment: LUCENE-1873.patch Adds Steve's last contrib changes suggestion > Update sit

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1873) Update site lucene-sandbox page

as a couple updates - also changed the page names from sandbox to contrib. > Update site lucene-sandbox page > --- > > Key: LUCENE-1873 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1873 > Project: Lucene

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1873) Update site lucene-sandbox page

html";>Contrib CHANGES for changes included in the current release. {code} > Update site lucene-sandbox page > --- > > Key: LUCENE-1873 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1873 > Project:

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1873) Update site lucene-sandbox page

txt file for each Contrib package for details. If the README.txt file does not address its backwards compatibility commitments, users should assume it does not make any compatibility commitments. {code} > Update site lucene-sandbox page > -

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1874) Further updates to the site scoring page

the site scoring page > > > Key: LUCENE-1874 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1874 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Mark Miller >

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1873) Update site lucene-sandbox page

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1873: Attachment: LUCENE-1873.patch first rough draft patch > Update site lucene-sandbox p

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1873) Update site lucene-sandbox page

of queries. swing Swing componenets designed to integrate with Lucene. wikipedia Tools for working with wikipedia content. wordnet Tools to help utilize wordnet synonyms with Lucene xml-query-parser A QueryParser that can read queries written in an XML format. > Update si

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1874) Further updates to the site scoring page

Further updates to the site scoring page Key: LUCENE-1874 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1874 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Mark Miller

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1873) Update site lucene-sandbox page

Update site lucene-sandbox page --- Key: LUCENE-1873 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1873 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Mark Miller Assignee: Mark

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1858) Update site level documentation

t for dead links and what not - but most things are in working order from what I can tell. > Update site level documentation > --- > > Key: LUCENE-1858 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1858 >

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1858) Update site level documentation

s to api/org/apache/lucene rather than api/core/org/apache/lucene > Update site level documentation > --- > > Key: LUCENE-1858 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1858 > Project: Lucene - Java

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1858) Update site level documentation

Update site level documentation --- Key: LUCENE-1858 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1858 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Task Reporter: Mark Miller Assignee: Mark

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1706) Site search powered by Lucene/Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729007#action_12729007 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1706: - Checking... > Site search pow

Re: broken links when building web-site

Yes, I've seen those too and have always wrote them off as Forrest errors. I could never track down anything actually wrong on the site, so I ignored it. The broken-links.xml file has been checked in for a good long time, I believe. On Jul 7, 2009, at 3:00 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote

Re: broken links when building web-site

at 3:00 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > I tried to build the docs inside trunk and also the docs in the site > (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/site), which both fail to > build. > > The error is the same here (Win XP), except, that it says, that it cannot > find the image

RE: broken links when building web-site

I tried to build the docs inside trunk and also the docs in the site (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/site), which both fail to build. The error is the same here (Win XP), except, that it says, that it cannot find the images (which are indeed not available). The last time I

RE: broken links when building web-site

Yes, I see something quite similar, though instead of "Is a directory", I'm getting "Access is denied" (on WinXP): X [0] images/instruction_arrow.png BROKEN: C:\svn\lucene\site\src\documentation\content\xdocs\images.instruction_arro

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1706) Site search powered by Lucene/Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728285#action_12728285 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1706: I'm rebuilding the

broken links when building web-site

I'm trying to regen the web site docs (w/ forrest), for LUCENE-1522, but I'm hitting a "BUILD FAILED" at the end, I think because of these broken links: X [0] images/instruction_arrow.pngBROKEN: /lucene/h2.1522/src/site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/images.instructio

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-1706) Site search powered by Lucene/Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll closed LUCENE-1706. --- Resolution: Fixed Lucene Fields: (was: [New]) > Site search powered by Lucene/S

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1706) Site search powered by Lucene/Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-1706: Attachment: LUCENE-1706.patch The Lucene site is in two parts, one for a specific version

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1706) Site search powered by Lucene/Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-1706: Attachment: LUCENE-1706.patch Patch attached. > Site search powered by Lucene/S

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1706) Site search powered by Lucene/Solr

Site search powered by Lucene/Solr -- Key: LUCENE-1706 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1706 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Grant Ingersoll

Re: svn commit: r784758 - in /lucene/java/trunk: ./ docs/ docs/lucene-sandbox/ src/site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/

 lucene/java/trunk/docs/lucene-sandbox/index.html >    lucene/java/trunk/docs/queryparsersyntax.html >    lucene/java/trunk/docs/scoring.html >    lucene/java/trunk/src/site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/site.xml > > Modified: lucene/java/trunk/build.xml > URL: > htt

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-1641) Correct spatial and trie documentation links in JavaDocs and site

in JavaDocs and site > - > > Key: LUCENE-1641 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1641 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement >

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1641) Correct spatial and trie documentation links in JavaDocs and site

and site > - > > Key: LUCENE-1641 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1641 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Componen

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1641) Correct spatial and trie documentation links in JavaDocs and site

Correct spatial and trie documentation links in JavaDocs and site - Key: LUCENE-1641 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1641 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1444) Broken javadocs->site docs links

]) Committed to site docs. Thanks! > Broken javadocs->site docs links > > > Key: LUCENE-1444 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1444 > Project: Lucene - Java >

[jira] Reopened: (LUCENE-1444) Broken javadocs->site docs links

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steven Rowe reopened LUCENE-1444: - Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [Patch Available, New]) > Broken javadocs-&g

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1444) Broken javadocs->site docs links

} to point to the new combined ("All") javadocs were missing from the previous patches. This patch corrects the oversight. See [http://www.nabble.com/Hudson-Java-Docs--td21650215.html]. > Broken javadocs->site docs links > > >

Re: how often is site updated?

: Wiki is updated w/ the info. Basically, it runs nightly. If you want it done : more often, I can change it. doesn't matter to me ... just wasn't sure if there was a problem since i didn't know when to expect it. it all looks fine. -Hoss --

Re: how often is site updated?

/www/lucene.apache.org/java/ docs from... http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/site/docs ...but the wiki page isn't very explicit about how often that cron script runs. I committed some changes a little over 3 hours ago, but i'm not seeing them on people.apache.org yet. Gra

how often is site updated?

According to this doc... http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/HowToUpdateTheWebsite ...Grant's crontab is used to update /www/lucene.apache.org/java/docs from... http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/site/docs ...but the wiki page isn't very explicit about how often that c

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1444) Broken javadocs->site docs links

Available, New]) Committed revision 728262. Thanks Steve! > Broken javadocs->site docs links > > > Key: LUCENE-1444 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1444 > Project: Lucene - Java >

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-1444) Broken javadocs->site docs links

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1444: -- Assignee: Michael McCandless > Broken javadocs->site docs

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-1444) Broken javadocs->site docs links

5 PM: --- After generating the site with Forrest and then copying over the generated javadocs, I found that the MemoryIndex javadoc link to queryparsersyntax.html had two too few go-up-one-level path elements. Also, I had forgotten to change the sidebar link to the All javadocs to include the new

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1444) Broken javadocs->site docs links

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-1444: Attachment: LUCENE-1444.patch After generating the site with Forrest and then copying over the

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1444) Broken javadocs->site docs links

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-1444: Attachment: LUCENE-1444.patch > Broken javadocs->site docs

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1444) Broken javadocs->site docs links

Broken javadocs->site docs links Key: LUCENE-1444 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1444 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Components: Javadocs Affects Versions:

RE: Broken javadocs->site docs links

On 11/07/2008 at 1:35 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Steven A Rowe wrote: > > This would not entirely fix the issue; each version's > > javadocs should link to the same version of the site docs, > > rather than to the latest version (which is what I assume you > > mean

Re: Broken javadocs->site docs links

Steven A Rowe wrote: This would not entirely fix the issue; each version's javadocs should link to the same version of the site docs, rather than to the latest version (which is what I assume you mean here). Right. The javadocs should use a relative link to point to versioned docs. Bu

RE: Broken javadocs->site docs links

link to the same version of the site docs, rather than to the latest version (which is what I assume you mean here). For example, the 2.3.2 version of the the o.a.l.document package summary should link to the 2.3.2 version of gettingstarted.html, instead of to the 2.4.0 version (currently the

Re: Broken javadocs->site docs links

> The javadocs for o.a.l.search.Similarity fixes this for queryparsersyntax.html in the versioned site docs by using a relative URL, but since the versioned documentation does not appear to be included in the Hudson build, the link is broken for the trunk javadocs (link text: "query syntax"):

Broken javadocs->site docs links

html> The javadocs for o.a.l.search.Similarity fixes this for queryparsersyntax.html in the versioned site docs by using a relative URL, but since the versioned documentation does not appear to be included in the Hudson build, the link is broken for the trunk javadocs (link text:

Re: svn commit: r660010 - in /lucene/java/site: docs/whoweare.html docs/whoweare.pdf src/documentation/content/xdocs/whoweare.xml

Michael Busch wrote: Welcome, Mark! :) -Michael Thanks Michael. Very happy to be aboard and ready to help in whatever limited ways I can. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: svn commit: r660010 - in /lucene/java/site: docs/whoweare.html docs/whoweare.pdf src/documentation/content/xdocs/whoweare.xml

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: markrmiller Date: Sun May 25 11:25:09 2008 New Revision: 660010 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=660010&view=rev Log: Added Mark Miller to Contrib Committers Welcome, Mark! :) -Michael

Re: Site

Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Jan 23, 2008 12:09 PM, Michael Busch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It doesn't actually work for some of the file types (like > style-sheets) though, so I manually do a dos2unix on those to avoid > extra commits. > Strange... why doesn't it work for style-sheets? -Micha

Re: Site

Site is restored. You probably did the native thing Yonik, but we recently created a new site directory at a higher level (same level as trunk), and that is where the problem is probably at. -Grant On Jan 23, 2008, at 12:17 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Jan 23, 2008 12:09 PM, Michael Busch

Re: Site

on Windows, so maybe > it's a problem with the line endings. I think we should set the > eol-style to native for all files in site/docs? I thought I had done that before. It doesn't actually work for some of the file types (like style-sheets) though, so I manually do a dos2

Re: Site

native for all files in site/docs? -Michael Grant Ingersoll wrote: > OK, I think I fixed it. I think we need to remove the .svn under > /www/l.a.o/java/docs such that the crontab just does it. I made the > mistake of doing an svn up on the site directory, when I should have > done t

Re: Site

OK, I think I fixed it. I think we need to remove the .svn under /www/ l.a.o/java/docs such that the crontab just does it. I made the mistake of doing an svn up on the site directory, when I should have done the export. -Grant On Jan 23, 2008, at 10:50 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: I

Re: Site

I confirm it is screwed up! Not sure what was done before. Michael, can you fix? Thanks, Grant On Jan 23, 2008, at 9:31 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: I think I may have screwed up the site by committing the Apachecon news... Why were there local diffs on the site? -Grant

Site

I think I may have screwed up the site by committing the Apachecon news... Why were there local diffs on the site? -Grant - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: site docs not updated for rev 607350

Cohen wrote: > > > Hi, I changed docs/javadocs.html about 5 days ago > > (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=607350), > > but this doesn't show on the Web site. > > > > I believe I followed all the instructions in 'HowToUpdateTheSite'

Re: site docs not updated for rev 607350

this doesn't show on the Web site. I believe I followed all the instructions in 'HowToUpdateTheSite', did I miss something, or maybe there is a problem with the script? Thanks, Doron -- Grant Ingersoll http://lucene.grantingersoll.com http://www.luceneb

site docs not updated for rev 607350

Hi, I changed docs/javadocs.html about 5 days ago (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=607350), but this doesn't show on the Web site. I believe I followed all the instructions in 'HowToUpdateTheSite', did I miss something, or maybe there is a problem with the script? Thanks, Doron

Re: site javadocs link broken

On Dec 28, 2007 5:33 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 28, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: > > Oh I see, what confused me is that the section and the > > page have almost identical names. Any objection to renaming > > the section to "Javadocs for Official Releases"? > >

Re: site javadocs link broken

Hi Steve, thanks, I missed that thread, now I can see it. Thanks, Doron On Dec 28, 2007 5:17 PM, Steven A Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Doron, > > On 12/28/2007 at 8:33 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: > > It is the trunk Javadocs that are missing for me - I don't see > > the link to Hudson. > [...]

Re: site javadocs link broken

On Dec 28, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: On Dec 28, 2007 4:17 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's auto-generated by Forrest, same as on all the other pages. Is kind of silly though, when there is only 1 section. Oh I see, what confused me is that the section and t

RE: site javadocs link broken

Hi Doron, On 12/28/2007 at 8:33 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: > It is the trunk Javadocs that are missing for me - I don't see > the link to Hudson. [...] > In what page do you see a link to > http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightly/javadoc/index.html?

Re: site javadocs link broken

On Dec 28, 2007 4:17 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's auto-generated by Forrest, same as on all the other pages. Is > kind of silly though, when there is only 1 section. Oh I see, what confused me is that the section and the page have almost identical names. Any objection

Re: site javadocs link broken

That's auto-generated by Forrest, same as on all the other pages. Is kind of silly though, when there is only 1 section. -Grant On Dec 28, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: Thanks Grant, I see it now, totally missed that thread. Is there a reason to keep the self "javadocs" link in http

Re: site javadocs link broken

Thanks Grant, I see it now, totally missed that thread. Is there a reason to keep the self "javadocs" link in http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/javadocs.html ? On Dec 28, 2007 3:54 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/55471?se

Re: site javadocs link broken

dson/job/Lucene-Nightly/javadoc/index.html? Thanks, Doron On Dec 27, 2007 6:08 PM, Steven A Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Doron, All of these worked for me when I clicked on them just now from the site: http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_2_0/api/index.html http://lucene.apache.org/

Re: site javadocs link broken

> > All of these worked for me when I clicked on them just now from the site: > > http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_2_0/api/index.html > http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_1_0/api/index.html > http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_0_0/api/index.html > > http://lucene.zones.apache.o

RE: site javadocs link broken

Hi Doron, All of these worked for me when I clicked on them just now from the site: http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_2_0/api/index.html http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_1_0/api/index.html http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_0_0/api/index.html http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene

site javadocs link broken

is the site javadocs link broken or is it just me? Doron

Re: whoops ... i may have screwed up the site.

Hudson runs the nightly script and pushes the site out to people.a.o On Oct 3, 2007, at 8:45 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote: Hoss - that could be my fault. I had updated both the Lucene and Solr sites in svn yesterday, and while logged in to svn up the Solr site I also did that for Lucene (even

Re: whoops ... i may have screwed up the site.

Hoss - that could be my fault. I had updated both the Lucene and Solr sites in svn yesterday, and while logged in to svn up the Solr site I also did that for Lucene (even though I knew Grant's nightly script was to update it also). Looks like all is well now. Is Hudson publishin

  1   2   >