[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-676) Promote solr's PrefixFilter into Java Lucene's core

2006-10-05 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
. > Promote solr's PrefixFilter into Java Lucene's core > --- > > Key: LUCENE-676 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-676 > Project: Lucene - Java >

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-676) Promote solr's PrefixFilter into Java Lucene's core

2006-09-26 Thread Andi Vajda (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-676?page=all ] Andi Vajda updated LUCENE-676: -- Attachment: TestPrefixFilter.java Here is another attachment by Yura providing the request unit test. > Promote solr's PrefixFilter into Java Lucen

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-676) Promote solr's PrefixFilter into Java Lucene's core

2006-09-26 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
ing should be commited/promoted to the Lucene code base without some Unit Tests. (PrefixFilter is exercised by a few tests in the Solr code base at the moment but they aren't portable because they go through the SolrCore) > Promote solr's PrefixFilter

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-676) Promote solr's PrefixFilter into Java Lucene's core

2006-09-25 Thread Andi Vajda (JIRA)
. > Promote solr's PrefixFilter into Java Lucene's core > --- > > Key: LUCENE-676 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-676 > Project: Lucene - Java >

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-676) Promote solr's PrefixFilter into Java Lucene's core

2006-09-25 Thread Andi Vajda (JIRA)
Promote solr's PrefixFilter into Java Lucene's core --- Key: LUCENE-676 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-676 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement

Re: Solr's PrefixFilter

2006-09-22 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Sep 22, 2006, at 8:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : Anyway, the id-generation implementation is hidden (package : protected), so I guess it should be fine to put it in Lucene. : Any objections? nope .. +1 for promoting to lucene/java +1 and Is now the time to consider promoting Func

Re: Solr's PrefixFilter

2006-09-22 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Anyway, the id-generation implementation is hidden (package : protected), so I guess it should be fine to put it in Lucene. : Any objections? nope .. +1 for promoting to lucene/java Is now the time to consider promoting FunctionQuery too :) -Hoss

Re: Solr's PrefixFilter

2006-09-22 Thread Yonik Seeley
On 9/22/06, Andi Vajda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A PyLucene user just submitted a patch to PyLucene to integrate Solr's PrefixFilter class. PyLucene is not PySolr but it looks like PrefixFilter has nothing specific to Solr in it and PrefixFilter could be useful to regular Lucene us

Solr's PrefixFilter

2006-09-22 Thread Andi Vajda
A PyLucene user just submitted a patch to PyLucene to integrate Solr's PrefixFilter class. PyLucene is not PySolr but it looks like PrefixFilter has nothing specific to Solr in it and PrefixFilter could be useful to regular Lucene users as well. Are there any objections to che