On Samstag 03 Dezember 2005 03:57, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> It would be nice to resolve/fix the whole "JavaCC using an exception
> for flow control" issue too.
Did anybody have a look yet at javacc 4.0beta1, does it maybe fix that
problem?
Regards
Daniel
--
http://www.danielnaber.de
--
Rest assured that human-readable query expressions aren't going away
at all. I don't think Mark even implied that. The idea is to have a
way to communicate a query electronically in a precise way that
avoids parser syntax and the awkwardness this could have with
analysis. This seems reas
Wolfgang,
First - I've authorized your address to send commit e-mails, so
they'll pass through right away from now on.
Related to your change - please take advantage of Subversion's "svn
move" command in the future when you're making these types of
changes. This will preserve history on
Thanks.
Just trying to get by with the weird Eclipse SVN client.
Wolfgang.
On Dec 3, 2005, at 7:54 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Wolfgang,
First - I've authorized your address to send commit e-mails, so
they'll pass through right away from now on.
Related to your change - please take advantage o
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Rest assured that human-readable query expressions aren't going away
at all. I don't think Mark even implied that.
That's right. The proposal is *not* to replace what is already there -
QueryParser will always have a useful role to play supporting the
"Google-like" que
Hi,
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > maxQueryTerms="30">
>
> We're back to MoreLikeThis - it's not currently a Query subclass.
> How do you envision this sort of thing fitting in if it's not a Query?
But MoreLikeThis class produces a Query. It's similar to google "d
Hi,
> From: markharw00d [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Re: MoreLikeThis queries.
> Yes, they can be usefully wrapped as queries (see attached simple
> example). In fact it was my attempts at bastardising QueryParser to
> support them that brought home it's limitations. I ended up with a
> subcl
On Saturday 03 December 2005 19:00, markharw00d wrote:
> Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
...
> parameters that tweak it's behaviour. If I don't have a query language
> that names the parameters explicitly (say, XML) I end up having to
> define what looks like a function with a long list of parameters: "li
On 12/3/05, Paul Elschot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indeed, this is a disadvantage of the "function call" syntax.
It depends on the langage. Take Python for example:
>>> def foo(a,b): print a,b
>>> foo(1,2)
1 2
>>> foo(a=1,b=2)
1 2
>>> foo(b=2,a=1)
1 2
>>>
-Yonik
Now hiring -- http://forms.c
