Steve Rowe and I have added scoring.xml (with some contributions from
Karl Wettin, Chris Hostetter and others) to the xdocs directory (and
scoring.html to the docs directory). Our goals in writing this
document were:
1. To better understand scoring
2. To document how scoring works for the
BUILD.txt instructions wrong for JavaCC
---
Key: LUCENE-661
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-661
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Other
Reporter: Ste
Extendable writer and reader of field data
--
Key: LUCENE-662
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-662
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Store
Le Mercredi 16 Août 2006 14:51, Grant Ingersoll a écrit :
> On Aug 16, 2006, at 8:32 AM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In the issue, you wrote that "This way the indexing level just
> > stores opaque
> > binary fields, and then Document handles compress/uncompressing as
> > needed."
> >
>
New feature rich higlighter for Lucene.
---
Key: LUCENE-663
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-663
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Search
Repo
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-565?page=comments#action_12429780 ]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-565:
-
I tested just the IndexWriter from this code base, it does not seem to work.
NewIndexModifier does work. I sim
I tested just the IndexWriter from this code base, it does not seem to work.
NewIndexModifier does work. I simply used IndexWriter to create several
documents and then search for them. Nothing came back even though it seems
something was written to disk.
The patch worked until several days ago
Yes I am including this patch as it is very useful for increasing the
efficiency of updates as you described. I will be conducting more tests and
will post any results. Yes a patch for IndexWriter will be useful so that the
entirety of this build will work. Thanks!
- Original Message ---
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-663?page=comments#action_12429816 ]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-663:
-
Hi Karel.
Many thanks for taking the time to make a contribution.
I would personally find it useful if you could describ
Would there be an interest in developing / contributing "canned" installers
for the more popular IDEs.
I would love to have a continuously built set of install JARs that let me
install the Lucene sources, test apps, contributions and necessary libraries
in one shot on my choice of Eclipse, NetB
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-663?page=comments#action_12429848 ]
Karel Tejnora commented on LUCENE-663:
--
Hi,
yes as I wrote in the code and keeps author - I borrow small code parts from
this contribution http://issues.apac
11 matches
Mail list logo