FileNotFound exception on adding a RAMDirectory to an IndexWriter
-
Key: LUCENE-1192
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1192
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Falca updated LUCENE-1192:
---
Description:
Hi,
I'm getting FileNotFoundException on adding RAMDirectory to an IndexWriter with
f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12572449#action_12572449
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1192:
This actually isn't quite a vali
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12572457#action_12572457
]
Alex Falca commented on LUCENE-1192:
Thanks for the explanations and proposed ways to
OOM exception while sorting on more than 1 field
Key: LUCENE-1193
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1193
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1184.
Resolution: Fixed
I just committed this. Thanks Tim!
> Allow SnapshotDeletionPol
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1192.
Resolution: Invalid
> FileNotFound exception on adding a RAMDirectory to an IndexW
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12572495#action_12572495
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1192:
You're welcome!
> FileNotFound e
Add deleteByQuery to IndexWriter
Key: LUCENE-1194
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1194
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Michael McCandless
Ass
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1194:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1194.patch
Attached patch. All tests pass.
> Add deleteByQuery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Falca closed LUCENE-1192.
--
Tried last option:
{quote}
* Close the ramIndexWriter before passing its directory to
addIndexe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12572576#action_12572576
]
Ning Li commented on LUCENE-1194:
-
Great to see deleteByQuery being added to IndexWriter!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12572637#action_12572637
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1194:
{quote}
When autoCommit is true,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-1187:
-
Attachment: javadocsZero2Match.patch
Attached javadocsZero2Match.patch that replaces the last fe
Performance improvement for TermInfosReader
---
Key: LUCENE-1195
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1195
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Index
On 26-Feb-08, at 3:00 PM, Michael Busch (JIRA) wrote:
50,000 AND queries with 3 terms each:
old: 152 secs
new (with LRU cache): 112 secs (26% faster)
50,000 OR queries with 3 terms each:
old: 175 secs
new (with LRU cache): 133 secs (24% faster)
For bigger ind
This can only possibly work if all 50,000 terms are held in memory,
otherwise the cache management overhead is going to matter.
What is the number of terms in the database? What is the distribution
of the terms used in the test case (differ for each query)?
Performance tests like this witho
That's what I was pointing out. The test is VERY broken
On Feb 26, 2008, at 5:53 PM, Mike Klaas wrote:
On 26-Feb-08, at 3:00 PM, Michael Busch (JIRA) wrote:
50,000 AND queries with 3 terms each:
old: 152 secs
new (with LRU cache): 112 secs (26% faster)
50,000 OR queries
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12572747#action_12572747
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1195:
--
Nice results!
I assume this is on a non-optim
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12572750#action_12572750
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1195:
---
Test details:
The index has 500,000 docs an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12572750#action_12572750
]
michaelbusch edited comment on LUCENE-1195 at 2/26/08 5:04 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12572753#action_12572753
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1195:
--
Thinking about a common use in Solr: doing a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12572768#action_12572768
]
Eric commented on LUCENE-1195:
--
When faceting(iterating all terms), will each term be looked
23 matches
Mail list logo
