On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 1:36 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Regarding real-time search and Solr, my feeling is the focus should be on
> first adding real-time search to Lucene, and then we'll figure out how to
> incorporate that into Solr later.
Otis, what do you mean exactly b
Interesting discussion.
>>I think we should seriously look at joining efforts with open-source Database
>>engine projects
I posted some initial dabblings here with a couple of the databases on your
list :http://markmail.org/message/3bu5klzzc5i6uhl7 but this is not really a
scalable solution
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628953#action_12628953
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1131:
Hmm -- this breaks back compat (a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1354:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.4
> Provide Programmatic Access to CheckIndex
> ---
OK -- I like that suggestion Andrew, so I incorporated it into new
patch on LUCENE-1354. Now, it's CheckIndex's static main() that does
that sleep, and then calls fix. This way you can call fix directly
from your code.
Mike
Andrew Zhang wrote:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Micha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1354:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1354.patch
Hi Grant, the patch looks good! I tweaked it a bit, t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628965#action_12628965
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1344:
Thanks Nicolas. I understand a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628967#action_12628967
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1131:
What if we implement numDeletedDocs() in IndexRea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628966#action_12628966
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1354:
-
will do.
--
http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/09/06/text-processing-why-servers-choke/
Some interesting ideas here on speeding up Lucene. (Thanks to Erik for
passing me the link)
Note, the paper is comparing against 2.2. It would be good to put up
numbers for 2.3, and it might be interesting to look
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:41 AM, mark harwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>for example joins are not possible using SOLR).
>
> It's largely *because* Lucene doesn't do joins that it can be made to scale
> out. I've replaced two large-scale database systems this year with
> distributed Lucene solutio
BTW, quoting Marcelo Ochoa (the developer behind the Oracle/Lucene
implementation) the three minimal features a transactional DB should support
for Lucene integration are:
1) The ability to define new functions (e.g. lcontains() lscore) which
would allow to bind queries to lucene and obtain docu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1366:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1366.patch
OK, this patch switches over all uses of the old names
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628991#action_12628991
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1131:
bq. What if we implement numDelet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1369.
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [Patch Availa
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Michael McCandless <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK -- I like that suggestion Andrew, so I incorporated it into new patch on
> LUCENE-1354. Now, it's CheckIndex's static main() that does that sleep, and
> then calls fix. This way you can call fix directly from y
Hi,
- Original Message
From: J. Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, September 7, 2008 4:04:58 AM
Subject: Re: Realtime Search for Social Networks Collaboration
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 1:36 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Regarding re
Remove remaining @author references
---
Key: LUCENE-1378
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1378
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Otis Gospodnetic
Priori
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Otis Gospodnetic updated LUCENE-1378:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1378.patch
> Remove remaining @author references
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12629088#action_12629088
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1378:
--
The patch of 20080907 has some comme
hots jessica simpson upskirt
http://jessica-simpson-pic.blogspot.com/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Mumbai Masti" group.
To post to this group, send email to Mumbai-Masti@googlegroups.com
To unsubsc
21 matches
Mail list logo
