My fault, I forgot to attach it. I've added it now. Let me know how
this works for you.
Randy Puttick
-Original Message-
From: Antoine Brun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:11 AM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: about numeric range searching with
Actually, it's a very small tweak to the Field class to permit Reader values
other than through the Text helper function. DocumentWriter (which actually
extracts and tokenizes the field data doesn't care about the artificial
restriction in Field).
Randy
-Original Message-
From: Adity
I recently submitted a patch that replaces the implementation for
multi-term queries (used for fuzzy and wildcard queries) with an
implementation that does the union through a priority queue (these are
always disjunctions). You *COULD* mimic this change to replace the
mechanism used for range quer
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-421?page=all ]
Randy Puttick updated LUCENE-421:
-
Attachment: FloatRangeScorer.java
IntegerRangeScorer.java
Fix for the bug found by IntegerRangeQueryTest
> Numeric range searching w
: N/A
Reporter: Randy Puttick
The scheme of compressing document norms to one byte loses a lot of
information. This completely breaks search ranking on small fields because
there is no way to see the difference between documents with shorter and longer
fields that contain the same number of
Environment: N/A
Reporter: Randy Puttick
Using a synonym expansion analyzer to add tokens with zero offset from the
substituted token should not extend the length of the field in the document
(for scoring purposes)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-518?page=comments#action_12369918 ]
Randy Puttick commented on LUCENE-518:
--
What you say would make sense if you thought that queries would contain several
synonyms. All my experience says that they don
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-517?page=comments#action_12369936 ]
Randy Puttick commented on LUCENE-517:
--
Thanks Yorik, this could work for my purposes; it'd be nice to have a choice on
a per-field basis don't you thin
-524
Project: Lucene - Java
Type: Improvement
Components: Search
Versions: 1.9
Reporter: Randy Puttick
The implementation of MultiTermQuery in terms of BooleanQuery introduces
several problems:
1) Collisions with maximum clause limit on boolean queries which throws
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-524?page=all ]
Randy Puttick updated LUCENE-524:
-
Attachment: MultiTermQuery.java
MultiTermScorer.java
Implements union operation on a priority queue and scores multi-term based on
maximum
10 matches
Mail list logo