On Fri, 19 Jun 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I downloaded the JDK1.1.6v1(glibc) and installed on my Red Hat Linux 5.0.
> But when I try to compile the "HelloWorld " program:
> ls -l /lib/libc.so.* gives me
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root
> 13 Jan 20 10:39 /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.0.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I read the FAQ but still could not find a solution. I downloaded a
copy of jdk-sbb-1.1.6-2.1.1glibc.i386.rpm from
http://anna.inf.u-szeged.hu/java/java-rpm.html. But when i
installed this RPM version, "libXm.so.1 is nee
Hello.
I downloaded the JDK1.1.6v1(glibc) and installed on my Red Hat Linux 5.0.
But when I try to compile the "HelloWorld " program:
javac HelloWorldApp.java
class HelloWorldApp {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("Hello World!"); //Display the string.
Peter Schuller wrote:
>
> > What development tool do you use to help on daily coding?
> > IDE, simple class browser, or just an editor.
>
> I use XEmacs for all my coding - it's great. The only thing I want now is
> something that'll save me from managing makefile (I'm working on such an app
>
On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> Your errors are different -- there have been reports of people having a
> completely working environment with 1.9.8 (as I recall) and things failing
> immediately with 1.9.9. JDK is starting for you? Do simple AWT apps work?
ehhh there was one file I f
On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> After trying out the 116v2-glibc there seems to be two issues:
>
> - you can't load a native library if it is outside of
> $JDK_HOME/lib/i586/green_threads,
It works fine for me. Make sure that the directory containing your native
librarie
Richard Hakim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi -
>
> Thank you very much to the two kind souls who replied to my query on getting
> the Java Web Server going.
>
> I have another question though. When I try to access a .jhtml file, I get
> the following error:
>
> Error getting compiled page
I was waiting on the release to verify whether the reported FreeBuilder was
something systemic, or was local to a particular environment. I was able to
run FreeBuilder quite well using v2 (and it's pretty fast, too!).
I've started the process of getting the 1.1.6v2 files to be sent to the mirr
DAVID BALAZIC writes:
> Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>
> >DAVID BALAZIC writes:
> > > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386
> > >
> > > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386
> > >
> > > but not on JDK 1.1.3 v 3.0.1 for IRIX on an SGI machine
> > >
> >
Juergen Sonnauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, users of the jdk1.1.6 v2-test libc5!
>
> Please, can someone test the following code that listens to key-pressed
> events.
> Try the keys TAB and ENTER and look at the key char value:
>
> java.awt.event.KeyEvent[KEY_PRESSED,keyCode=9,Tab] on la
There is no java-linux.org domain.
I've tried [EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PROTECTED], but
neither address exists, (let alone has a java-linux list).
I am having a crash on startup problem. Here is my ldconfig -D.
This machine was upgraded from RedHat 4, to 5 include patches. We have
no
Hi, users of the jdk1.1.6 v2-test libc5!
Please, can someone test the following code that listens to key-pressed
events.
Try the keys TAB and ENTER and look at the key char value:
java.awt.event.KeyEvent[KEY_PRESSED,keyCode=9,Tab] on label0
KeyChar=65289
java.awt.event.KeyEvent[KEY_PRESSED,keyC
Works for me on RedHat 4.2 libc. Are sure you have that native library
in your LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
BTW, as far as I understand, 116v2 is a libc only port and was not
tested with glibc.
---
Igor Slepchin
Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
>
> After trying out the 116v2-glibc there seems to be two issues
Michael Plump writes:
> On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote:
>
> > I also have ld.so 1.9.9 , does that matter ?
>
> I downgraded to ld.so.1.9.6 and got the exact same errors (I even diffed
> the two error files, and they were EXACTLY the same...)
Your errors are different -- there ha
After trying out the 116v2-glibc there seems to be two issues:
- you can't load a native library if it is outside of
$JDK_HOME/lib/i586/green_threads,
- loading a native library with the jni interface gives a segfault
(worked with 115v7-glibc)
System: Debian-2.0 (unstable 'slink' ditro)
--
>
>
> No nedit users?
Yup, me.
Vin
No nedit users?
Jim.
At 11:49 PM 6/18/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Thanks for all your input.
>
>I get 17 responses today. Here is a summary:
>
>Xemacs: 6
>Pico: 3
>vi: 2
>JDE: 2
>Jacob: 2
>Emacs: 2
>WipeOut: 1
>Simplicity: 1
>Cat (!?) : 1
>
>I've took out jdk cause I think everyone should be using
On 18-Jun-98 Peter Schuller wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Does anyone know a good commercial Java IDE that runs in Linux?
> Prefarably
> written in Java.
>
> All the supposedly good ones, like JBuilder and Visul Cafe, are for
> Windoze
> only...
Theres a RAID tool called "Simplicity for java". You can down
One more vi/Vim user! (gvim, with java/C++ syntax highlighting).
Bill Wadley wrote:
>
> Oops, add one more vi user! Actually, ViM, but any way...
>
> B-)
>
> On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Sze Yuen Wong wrote:
>
> > Thanks for all your input.
> >
> > I get 17 responses today. Here is a summary:
> >
--
Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>DAVID BALAZIC writes:
> > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386
> >
> > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386
> >
> > but not on JDK 1.1.3 v 3.0.1 for IRIX on an SGI machine
> >
> > I have an ancient Slackware distribution on x86 m
> > Xemacs: 6
> > Pico: 3
> > vi: 2
> > JDE: 2
> > Jacob: 2
> > Emacs: 2
> > WipeOut: 1
> > Simplicity: 1
> > Cat (!?) : 1
I see no 'joe'. Add one for me.
Cheers, Craig
--
Lots of folks confuse bad management with destiny.
-- Frank Hubbard
=
>On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote:
>
>> I also have ld.so 1.9.9 , does that matter ?
>
>I downgraded to ld.so.1.9.6 and got the exact same errors (I even diffed
>the two error files, and they were EXACTLY the same...)
Reverting to ld 1.9.5 fixes the problems !
Details :
jdk 1.1.6v1 libc5
hi,
I'm just uploading Steve's jdk port 1.1.6 v2 test1 to redhat's incoming.
I'm change the name of the jdk rpms to be able to keep both port
in redhat's contrib area. new rpms are
Steve Byrne's port
jdk-sbb-1.1.6-2.1glibc.i386.rpm
jdk-sbb-1.1.6-2.1glibc.src.rpm
Sergej Nikitin's port
jdk-sn-1.1.
No sooner than I sent out the first notice than I received a message from
one of the libc maintainers. There was indeed a bug in the getlocalhost
code wrt glibc. The fixed version is at
http://www.seawood.org/java/getlocalhost2.c for the curious.
The new tarballs are at
http://www.seawood.or
On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote:
> I also have ld.so 1.9.9 , does that matter ?
I downgraded to ld.so.1.9.6 and got the exact same errors (I even diffed
the two error files, and they were EXACTLY the same...)
Mich
Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>Michael Plump writes:
> > On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote:
> >
> > > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386
> > >
> > > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386
> > >
> > > SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
> > > st
On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> Hold on there -- I don't think the guy you mention has the same problem. He's
> using ld 1.9.9, which seems to have broken binary compatibility with earlier
> versions of ld (like 1.9.6). I'm pretty sure that's the cause of the problem
wait a minute...
The jdk1.1.6 v2-test1 files are available at http://www.seawood.org/java/.
It does not fix the InetAddr.getLocalHost() problem as that problem seems
to be a general glibc problem. See
http://www-gnats.gnu.org:8080/cgi-bin/wwwgnats.pl/full/667 for details.
As a workaround for that problem, eit
Michael Plump writes:
> On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote:
>
> > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386
> >
> > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386
> >
> > SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
> > stackbase=0xb8e0, stackpointer=0xb7ec
> > .
DAVID BALAZIC writes:
> This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386
>
> I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386
>
> but not on JDK 1.1.3 v 3.0.1 for IRIX on an SGI machine
>
> I have an ancient Slackware distribution on x86 machine.
> I upgraded manually most of SW , so I
Oops, add one more vi user! Actually, ViM, but any way...
B-)
On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Sze Yuen Wong wrote:
> Thanks for all your input.
>
> I get 17 responses today. Here is a summary:
>
> Xemacs: 6
> Pico: 3
> vi: 2
> JDE: 2
> Jacob: 2
> Emacs: 2
> WipeOut: 1
> Simplicity: 1
> Cat (!?) : 1
>
31 matches
Mail list logo
