sdk 1.1.6 Sparc/linux kit problems? (fwd)

1998-09-23 Thread Phil Hunt
hi there Sorry to send this directly, but java-linux.org doesn't seem to exist anymore... I am lost.. hw: Sparc/Linux 1.0.9 Ultra/10 Sun machine...256meg memory RedHat 5.0 problem: Following the readme.linux instructions, I unpacked into /SDK-1.1.6/ Set up a link to /SDK-1.1.6/bin/j

Re: VISIBROKER FOR LINUX

1998-09-23 Thread Todd R. Palmer
> Is there a version of VISIBROKER for Linux? Visibroker for Java will run on the Linux JVM. It is a 100% pure java CORBA implimentation. The ORB's and services are all implimented in Java, and yes it includes a idl2java and a java2idl compilers. Visigenic was bought by Borland and together

VISIBROKER FOR LINUX

1998-09-23 Thread Calixto Melean (Personal)
Is there a version of VISIBROKER for Linux? if yes, where? else Is there an idl2java compiler for linux?

Re: JDK & native threads

1998-09-23 Thread Peter C. Mehlitz
>>> An alternative is Kaffe, but it's too incomplete to be usable right now. >>> Is anyone working on producing a version of the JDK that uses native >>> threads ? > >I don't know if Kaffe actually uses native threads... Since Native >Threads do not exist on FreeBSD, it for sure does not use them

JDK 1.1.6 Version 4a and VolanoMark 2.0

1998-09-23 Thread John Neffenger
Thanks for the great port in Version 4a! It fixes that socket timeout bug I reported here back in October 1997 against JDK 1.1.3. I was unable to reproduce the problem at all outside of the VolanoMark benchmark or our VolanoChat product, but I'm grateful someone figured it out. Using the same V

Re: JDK & native threads

1998-09-23 Thread Michael Sinz
On Wed, 23 Sep 1998 09:42:48 -0700, Gerald Gutierrez wrote: >> (Ok, so on older versions, reads from STDIN/STDOUT/STDERR were a problem >> but this has been addressed) >> > > >Are you sure ? The following seems to indicate that at least >STDIN will block everything. Yes, I am sure - you need to

Re: JDK & native threads

1998-09-23 Thread Michael Sinz
On Wed, 23 Sep 1998 09:29:19 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >On Tue, 22 Sep 1998, Gerald Gutierrez wrote: > >> I'm starting to pull out my hair from the fact that the current JDK is >> based on user threads. I can't call anything that can potentially block, >> because everything will blo

Re: JDK & native threads

1998-09-23 Thread Gerald Gutierrez
> (Ok, so on older versions, reads from STDIN/STDOUT/STDERR were a problem > but this has been addressed) > Are you sure ? The following seems to indicate that at least STDIN will block everything. import java.io.*; public class Threads extends Thread { public static void main (String[]

Re: JDK & native threads

1998-09-23 Thread mab
On Wed, 23 Sep 1998, Alexander V. Konstantinou wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on Wed, Sep 23, 1998 at 09:29:19AM - > 0400: > > Are you saying that if my application has 5 threads running, and > > one of them blocks on a blocking method (i.e., BufferedReader.readLine() > >

Re: JDK & native threads

1998-09-23 Thread Alexander V. Konstantinou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on Wed, Sep 23, 1998 at 09:29:19AM - 0400: > Are you saying that if my application has 5 threads running, and > one of them blocks on a blocking method (i.e., BufferedReader.readLine() > on a client socket) then the 4 other threads are blocking (not run

Re: JDK & native threads

1998-09-23 Thread mab
On Tue, 22 Sep 1998, Gerald Gutierrez wrote: > I'm starting to pull out my hair from the fact that the current JDK is > based on user threads. I can't call anything that can potentially block, > because everything will block. > Are you saying that if my application has 5 threads running, and o

Re: JDK & native threads

1998-09-23 Thread Michael Sinz
On 23 Sep 1998 00:31:35 -0700, Anand Palaniswamy wrote: >> An alternative is Kaffe, but it's too incomplete to be usable right now. >> Is anyone working on producing a version of the JDK that uses native >> threads ? I don't know if Kaffe actually uses native threads... Since Native Threads do

Re: Delete all class files

1998-09-23 Thread peter . pilgrim
> Thanks to everyone who wrote back! FWIW, the simplest solution for my > purposes turned out to be the addition of the following line: > > Markus Fritz wrote: > > > > Just use > > > > vpath %.class $(ROOT)/classes > > > > in your makefile > > > Cheers, > -Armen > Please, Just out

JDK1.1.6v4 for i386

1998-09-23 Thread satya seshu kumar dammu
hi, i tried looking for the JDK1.1.6v4 for i386 from the links provided at http://substance.blackdown.org/java-linux/info.html but all i could find under the mirror sites i386/glibc sections is the V1 & V2 of JDK1.1.6. please guide me to the correct location for downloading JDK1.1.6V4 for i3

Re: JDK & native threads

1998-09-23 Thread Anand Palaniswamy
Gerald Gutierrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm starting to pull out my hair from the fact that the current JDK is > based on user threads. I can't call anything that can potentially block, > because everything will block. "Green threads" converts all your blocking I/O into non-blocking ones

JDK & native threads

1998-09-23 Thread Gerald Gutierrez
I'm starting to pull out my hair from the fact that the current JDK is based on user threads. I can't call anything that can potentially block, because everything will block. An alternative is Kaffe, but it's too incomplete to be usable right now. Is anyone working on producing a version of the J