I have a followup to my earlier mail. The NumLock key does work with
jdk116v5, however, the Enter key doesn't work as expected. It would be
nice to have these bugs fixed in 117. The application I am testing was
primarily developed on Solaris, so these problems are most likely only in
the linux por
Cool... thank you for your help.
--jason
On 11-Jan-99 Juergen Kreileder wrote:
>> Jason Dillon writes:
>
> Jason> Does this apply to native methods as well? The docs do not
> Jason> really mention anything about native methods (not in that
> Jason> section anyways). I am wonde
I was just wondering if anyone else has had trouble using the number pad
with num-lock on? I searched the jitterbug database, and there was one bug
reported a while back in 116 which was supposedly fixed.
My setup is blackdown jdk117v1a, RedHat 5.2 i386, KDE window manager, (I
tried several other
> Jason Dillon writes:
Jason> Does this apply to native methods as well? The docs do not
Jason> really mention anything about native methods (not in that
Jason> section anyways). I am wondering if it is safe to assume
Jason> that marking a native method as synchronized will
Does this apply to native methods as well? The docs do not really mention
anything about native methods (not in that section anyways). I am wondering if
it is safe to assume that marking a native method as synchronized will
automagicly protect the object from access by other threads or if I have
> Jason Dillon writes:
Jason> This is not really java-linux specific, but this is the
Jason> only java related group that I am subscribed to. I am
Jason> wondering if a native method is specified as synchronized
Jason> if the jvm will perform the proper MontiorEnter &
Jas
This is not really java-linux specific, but this is the only java related group
that I am subscribed to. I am wondering if a native method is specified as
synchronized if the jvm will perform the proper MontiorEnter & MonitorExit
calls or if I should call them in the native method.
So for exampl
Is it possible to participate in the JDK linux port project as an volunteer?
Thanks.
Sam
Marcel -
> Armen Yampolsky wrote:
>
>> Marcel,
>>
>> Thanks for your great summary! BTW, I just wanted to let you know,
>> we've switched to omniORB2/Sun IDL (JDK1.2) instead of Visibroker.
>
> We had at that time a lot of problems with omniORB, threads,
> exceptions, the gcc/egcs couldn't handle
Ron,
> b. Armen, as I understand things,
>
> - omniORB2 is a C++ ORB (no Java lang. mappings at present).
> Presumably this is your "C++ appserver" correct? (And presumably
> you have this running on Linux?)
Yes, that's right.
> - JavaIDL, as you note, requires JDK1.2, which as of now (this
> w
I'd like to do one of two things with this mailing list, as it's really
become a significant amount of traffic. Either move it to a newsgroup,
or move it to a place willing to host the java-linux and java-linux-digest
lists. The world unfortunately isn't a place of free bandwidth forever
and I h
On Sun, 10 Jan 1999, Ron Resnick wrote:
> - JavaIDL, as you note, requires JDK1.2, which as of now (this
> week/day, anyway :) still isn't avail. on Linux, so this is
> probably running for you on NT/Solaris/other, right?
I have successfully extracted the JavaIDL ORB from JDK1.2b3 and use it
und
Jim Waldo - SMI Software Development wrote:
>
> Hi folks --
>
> Any words on when the Java 2 (aka 1.2) port is available? I would love to get
> a port of Jini out on Linux early (and often), but we are completely 1.2
> based.
>
> Any words you could give would be a help.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jim W
Armen Yampolsky wrote:
>
> Marcel,
>
> Thanks for your great summary! BTW, I just wanted to let you know, we've switched to
>omniORB2/Sun IDL (JDK1.2) instead of Visibroker. I felt that visi was just way too
> expensive, and being a believer in the benefits of Open Source software (and reading
On Sat, 9 Jan 1999, Chris Abbey wrote:
> The recent on-list exchange between John Summerfield and Kontorotsui has
> brought a background thought of mine to the foreground, so I'd like to share
> it with the list and see what the general opinion is.
>
> I suggest that the current copy of the FAQ
hellow linux and java fan
can I get another good java sniffer package rather then the
www.besiex.org/ByProxy/Developers/Sniffers/programming_guide.html
16 matches
Mail list logo
