Hmmm.. New to the game

1999-02-26 Thread Michael
I need to install the JRE on a server for one specific application.. read the docs, but a little confused.. (Sorry for such a basic question, but the archives weren't responding) Of the 3 distros.. I tried first the jre, and then the jdk.. (Still haven't figured out what the rt is..) Using the 1

Re: Janpanese Font for Linux.

1999-02-26 Thread Tomoyuki Kosimizu
At 10:25 AM 99.2.26, Jianli Fan wrote: > Hi, if you know where I can get the Japanese fonts for Linux or Sun > Solaris, please let me know. Your help are highly appreciated. XFree86 package includes Japanese fonts. So you can get it from one of mirrors. For instance: ftp://ring.so-net.ne.jp/pub/

Janpanese Font for Linux.

1999-02-26 Thread Jianli Fan
Hi, if you know where I can get the Japanese fonts for Linux or Sun Solaris, please let me know. Your help are highly appreciated. Jianli -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Re: Don't download JDK1.2src! [Was: Re: JAVA2 source code]

1999-02-26 Thread Matt Welsh
Artur Biesiadowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't think that signing electronic license would stand in any court. > With old licensing scheme, you had to sign it on paper and fax/mail it - > and this oligate you to something, but anybody can click license for me > - these passwords aren't

re: Electrical Fire

1999-02-26 Thread Daniel W. Dulitz x108
Nick Bailey writes: > "In the interim, there had been some bit-rot and, after some effort, the > code will compile, but not > run." (on the Unix page). They are working on it, though. The > Microsoft version works fine. Good luck to porting team, though! > > I've no criticism on the Netscape/Mo

re: Electrical Fire

1999-02-26 Thread Nick Bailey
The bit I had in mind was: "In the interim, there had been some bit-rot and, after some effort, the code will compile, but not run." (on the Unix page). They are working on it, though. The Microsoft version works fine. Good luck to porting team, though! I've no criticism on the Netscape/Mozill

Re: Hatred of 1.2 messages

1999-02-26 Thread Paolo Ciccone
> "GG" == Gerald Gutierrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: GG> Then the web page is only providing most potential users with GG> a table full of colors and very little information for which GG> they then look on the mailing list. I disagree, having that page with the table that shows

Re: Don't download JDK1.2src! [Was: Re: JAVA2 source code]

1999-02-26 Thread Nathan Meyers
Cees de Groot wrote: > Artur Biesiadowski wrote: > > > I don't think that signing electronic license would stand in any court. > > With old licensing scheme, you had to sign it on paper and fax/mail it - > > and this oligate you to something, but anybody can click license for me > > - these passw

Re: Don't download JDK1.2src! [Was: Re: JAVA2 source code]

1999-02-26 Thread Cees de Groot
Artur Biesiadowski wrote: > I don't think that signing electronic license would stand in any court. > With old licensing scheme, you had to sign it on paper and fax/mail it - > and this oligate you to something, but anybody can click license for me > - these passwords aren't very secure, are they

**** INVITATION *****

1999-02-26 Thread Med BELHEDI
Hello, I am a new Web master, I will be so happy to invite you to visit my web Site on the : http://anis.citeweb.net Please give me all your precious suggestion to make it more powerful. Have Fun

Re: [rtl] Re: Java and rtl (was LabView for Linux)

1999-02-26 Thread mike cravens
I haven't Nikolay Ognyanov wrote: > Hi James, > > Could you please tell us a bit more about your project? The problem > of putting RT Linux into FLASH has been raised several times on > this list but as far as I can recall you are the first one to present a > real case study. Could you tell more

Re: [rtl] Re: Java and rtl (was LabView for Linux)

1999-02-26 Thread mike cravens
I haven't looked at the site, but I understand that rt Java is built on top of ChorusOS, which Sun acqwuired for that purpose. There are many references on the Web to Chorus OS. Claims are made that it can be reduced in size to as small as 10K. There was a version of ChorusOS that had BSD ru

Re: Don't download JDK1.2src! [Was: Re: JAVA2 source code]

1999-02-26 Thread Scott Murray
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Cees de Groot wrote: > Oliver Fels wrote: > > > Just for your interest and in case noone has mentioned it yet: > > > > Sun is now making the source code to the Java® 2 platform > > available to the developer community. > > > > Yes, but *please* think twice before committing

Re: Don't download JDK1.2src! [Was: Re: JAVA2 source code]

1999-02-26 Thread Leo Cyr
This makes very good sense. On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Cees de Groot wrote: > Oliver Fels wrote: > > > Just for your interest and in case noone has mentioned it yet: > > > > Sun is now making the source code to the Java® 2 platform > > available to the developer community. > > > > Yes, but *please*

Re: Don't download JDK1.2src! [Was: Re: JAVA2 source code]

1999-02-26 Thread Artur Biesiadowski
Cees de Groot wrote: > Yes, but *please* think twice before committing your soul to Sun! > > I hope it is clear that the second you agree to their license, you can forget > about contributing to Japhar, Classpath, Kaffe, etcetera - the real Open Source > alternatives to Sun's JDK. If your compan

Location of Benchmarks

1999-02-26 Thread sgee
would someone please repost the link to the latest benchmarks Good old lotus-notes "ate" some of my archived mail Thanks Steve Gee Actuate Administrator/Java Developer Maxor National Pharmacies - Information Technologies www.maxor.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: Electrical Fire

1999-02-26 Thread Daniel W. Dulitz x108
Nick Bailey writes: > ...but have you read the Unix page? > > http://www.mozilla.org/projects/ef/unixbuild.html > > Another one in the eye for Linux users wanting efficient Java. Also, > the main page says "get JDK 1.2, then..." I don't understand how this is a problem. They say you need JDK

Don't download JDK1.2src! [Was: Re: JAVA2 source code]

1999-02-26 Thread Cees de Groot
Oliver Fels wrote: > Just for your interest and in case noone has mentioned it yet: > > Sun is now making the source code to the Java® 2 platform > available to the developer community. > Yes, but *please* think twice before committing your soul to Sun! I hope it is clear that the second you ag

Java Plugin (activator) question

1999-02-26 Thread Samuli Kaski
Hi all, What is the status of the Java Plugin for Linux? Some months ago I downloaded activator-linux from the blackdown site but it never worked (always crashed on SIGKILL even after I remapped all .so's). Now I can't even find the file from the blackdown site. What's up? I found an activator-l

Re: Servlet support in linux

1999-02-26 Thread Oliver Fels
At Fri, 26 Feb 1999 Minren Guan wrote: >Hi there, > >Does anyone know that how to make apache in linux be >servlet enabled ? actually I've implemented a simple See http://java.apache.org Oliver -- ___ Oliver Fels| e-mail:

Servlet support in linux

1999-02-26 Thread Minren Guan
Hi there, Does anyone know that how to make apache in linux be servlet enabled ? actually I've implemented a simple servlet runtime environment purely in java and I think one of the solutions is to write a cgi program which can link the apache with my program, but is that the most efficient appr

Re: Electrical Fire

1999-02-26 Thread Nick Bailey
...but have you read the Unix page? http://www.mozilla.org/projects/ef/unixbuild.html Another one in the eye for Linux users wanting efficient Java. Also, the main page says "get JDK 1.2, then..." So it will be a time yet before anything of use comes out, reading between the lines. There's n

Re: Problem!

1999-02-26 Thread Oliver Fels
When I try to compile a java program that I have written, I get the error: unable to initialize threads: cannot find class java/lang/Thread Could you please help me? Did you set your CLASSPATH to the right classes.zip ? Can you open your classes archive and looked inside whether the java.lang.th

Re: Hatred of 1.2 messages

1999-02-26 Thread Gerald Gutierrez
>Please understand that we're doing what we can. Yes I understand and appreciate your effort. I'm sure you can understand my intentions as well. I am only trying to influence those whom I see as threats to your effort to change for the better. >I think it's pretty common knowledge now that sche

Re: Hatred of 1.2 messages

1999-02-26 Thread Gerald Gutierrez
While I understand the pure "netiquette" viewpoint and would tend to believe that it would be best in an ideal world, this is not the ideal world and I cannot agree with it. One cannot expect everyone to follow the rules. If the mailing list is only willing to cater to people who do-it-right, it

Re: calling cgi from java

1999-02-26 Thread wdacruz
You should check www.perl.com. The latest devel. version (I think 5.005_54) includes JPL, which allows java programs to work with Perl and CGI. Walter. At 11:20 AM 2/25/99 -0800, you wrote: >Thanks for the reference of the Java H