I believe your using the link command incorrectly. I could be wrong in
regards to Linux usage, but I believe the proper way would be;
ln {args} source target
the "->" shouldn't be there. And you can link file to file, so I'd have to
look at this in Linux myself. But I'd try it w/out
When i am trying
ln -s /usr/lib/libstdc++-lib6.0-1.so.2 -> /usr/lib/libstdc++.so
i am getting an error that the last argument must be a directory.
Please help me because jdk1.2 doesn't run.
___
Get your free, private email at http://
Chris Abbey wrote:
>
> Are you firewalling the AUTH port? ...
> Anyway, if you can successfully do `nslookup smtp-server` on the workstation
> you _shouldn't_ have any problems with inetaddr.get{all}byName either, at
> least I've never seen any. Good luck. -=Chris
Hi , thanks, I'll take care ab
On Sat, 3 Apr 1999, Jonathan Mark Brooks wrote:
> I suspect that they didn't get the point. What people are asking for is
> that the graphical elements of java be implemented with GTK+ rather than
> Motif or some other platform specific GUI kit (GTK exists for win32 now as
> well...). Even Swing
Jonathan Mark Brooks wrote:
>
> I suspect that they didn't get the point. What people are asking for is
> that the graphical elements of java be implemented with GTK+ rather than
> Motif or some other platform specific GUI kit (GTK exists for win32 now as
> well...). Even Swing must at some lev
I suspect that they didn't get the point. What people are asking for is
that the graphical elements of java be implemented with GTK+ rather than
Motif or some other platform specific GUI kit (GTK exists for win32 now as
well...). Even Swing must at some level call on GUI elements that are
coded
My understanding is that Netscape will be using GTK+ instead of Motif
for Netscape 5.0 (which may explain why they are slow to get it out) so
Sun may already be considering this (save those license fees).
Someone should ask. Couldn't hurt.
On Sat, 3 Apr 1999, Jeff Galyan wrote:
> That's a ques
> > > Maybe because NT is notorious for being very unfriendly to Java?
> >
> > Huh? NT is one of the best Java platforms around. It's relatively stable,
has
> > great JVM availability, has very stable JVMs, has a slew of IDEs and other
> > tools, has several very fast compilers
> >
> > We do
Ulli Kortenkamp wrote:
> > "Jeff" == Jeff Galyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jeff> That's a question you should pose to Sun. Matthew Panetta
> Jeff> wrote:
> >> Given that there are a few good windowing toolkit out now for
> >> linux (GTK, QT, JX) could the JDK be proted
> "Jeff" == Jeff Galyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff> That's a question you should pose to Sun. Matthew Panetta
Jeff> wrote:
>> Given that there are a few good windowing toolkit out now for
>> linux (GTK, QT, JX) could the JDK be proted to these instead of
>> useing
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Richard James wrote:
> I am new to java and the 1.2 JDK. I am running RedHat 5.2 and the
> Blackdown JDK1.2-v1pre-release. The install went fine. I have finally
> figured out the libstdc++ link and I can successfully compile command
> line applications.
>
> However, I am get
On Thu, 1 Apr 1999, Joe Lin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have realized after many agonizing hours that some of my problem is really
> due to Kaffe. I'm currently running RedHat 5.2 and I downloaded JDK preview
> v1. I set the PATH variable to point to "/usr/jdk1.2/bin". However, this
> does not prevent Ka
Jeff Galyan wrote:
>
> Jim Frost wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe because NT is notorious for being very unfriendly to Java?
> >
> > Huh? NT is one of the best Java platforms around. It's relatively stable, has
> > great JVM availability, has very stable JVMs, has a slew of IDEs and other
> > tools, has
"Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Mustafa Radi" wrote:
> since Sun does not see, that Linux is becoming a competitive
> alternative to Microsoft's Windows
>
You clearly have not been paying attention to the news, have you?
--
Jeff Galyan
http://www.anamorphic.com
http://www.sun.com
jeffrey dot galyan at sun d
The reason the Windows L&F doesn't run on other platforms is because it
is not known whether Sun can legally distribute that L&F on non-Windows
platforms. The MacOS L&F doesn't work on non-Macintosh platforms for the
same reason.
Matthew McKeon wrote:
>
> I don't suppose anyone knows of / can
com.sun.java.swing.* have been renamed to javax.swing.*.
Update your import declarations and you should be fine.
> Richard James wrote:
>
> I am new to java and the 1.2 JDK. I am running RedHat 5.2 and the
> Blackdown JDK1.2-v1pre-release. The install went fine. I have finally
> figured out
Jim Frost wrote:
>
> > Maybe because NT is notorious for being very unfriendly to Java?
>
> Huh? NT is one of the best Java platforms around. It's relatively stable, has
> great JVM availability, has very stable JVMs, has a slew of IDEs and other
> tools, has several very fast compilers
>
If you "only have access to a Win95 machine", why aren't you just
getting the Win32 version of Java from Sun? Win95 and Linux are so
completely *not* similar in any way...
Volker Augustin wrote:
>
> Ok, there has been a long discussion about using bzip2 or not. Apart from personal
>problems us
That's a question you should pose to Sun.
Matthew Panetta wrote:
>
> Given that there are a few good windowing toolkit out now for linux (GTK,
> QT, JX) could the JDK be proted to these instead of useing mofit?
>
> Regards Matt
>
--
Jeff Galyan
http://www.anamorphic.com
http://www.sun.com
19 matches
Mail list logo
