Subclass it and declare it implements KeyListener.
-- finito
-- rob
- Original Message -
From: Wayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 1999 3:50 AM
Subject: Can A Frame have a KeyListener?
> Hello,
> The subject said it all. From my little test I w
>
> One thing I'm wondering about is Linux's support for SYSV-style IPC
> (semop etc.). Those appear to be kernel-supported semaphores. Maybe
> the problem is not in the lack of kernel support, but could be fixed
> by using SysV semaphores instead? It would definitely be worth a try.
>
> On t
>>Finally, I can hold my head up with pride :-)
>Why? Were you involved in developing the IBM JDK? ;-)
No, it's just that my friends who do Java on Windows can't laugh at me
anymore.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
. . . .. . . . http://
>
> >I ran the JVMSpec98 benchmarks from the cmdline to see how Kaffe
> >measures up against other JVMs.
>
> Wow, nice numbers. I'm excited to see that ibmjdk on Linux is now in
> the same ballpark (or faster!) as msjvm and the Sun VM on Windows.
> Finally, I can hold my head up with pride :-)
Hi,
Matt Welsh wrote:
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have a simple Java program where 2 threads spin in a tight loop each
> grabbing the same lock and releasing it. This is on Linux x86 and has been
> tested using GCJ 2.95.1, Blackdown JDK 1.1.7v3 (native threads), and
> IBM JDK 1.1.8 (native threa
> Christian Kruggel writes:
Christian> Hi there! Using Java 1.1.7B on a Linux machine and
Christian> running the appended programm leads to the following
Christian> Exception:
Christian> java.net.UnknownHostException: mailhost
Sounds like a setup problem. Can you ping mailh
On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, Chris Abbey wrote:
> At 23:21 10/16/99 -0600, Brandon Anderson wrote:
> >
> >OK, here is the thread dump, but like I already wrote in the previous
> >post I only get this while running java_g so I don't know if its really
> >relevant.
> >
> >*** panic: "../../../../src/shar
>I ran the JVMSpec98 benchmarks from the cmdline to see how Kaffe
>measures up against other JVMs.
Wow, nice numbers. I'm excited to see that ibmjdk on Linux is now in
the same ballpark (or faster!) as msjvm and the Sun VM on Windows.
Finally, I can hold my head up with pride :-)
How do other pe
Hello,
The subject said it all. From my little test I would say no, but maybe
there
is a way for this to happen. Any solutions?
TIA
Wayne
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
> Aaron Mulder writes:
Aaron> Is there any workaround? I installed Oracle for Linux, and
Aaron> all it's tools run via java -native, and there are *ever so
Aaron> many* scripts to edit to change that! ;)
You can modify jdk117_v3/bin/.java_wrapper:
--- jdk117_v3/bin/.java_wrapp
Is there any workaround? I installed Oracle for Linux, and all
it's tools run via java -native, and there are *ever so many* scripts to
edit to change that! ;)
Thanks,
Aaron
P.S. to Nathan: I have a /proc filesystem and the kernel is compiled from
the Red Hat 2.2.12 source with
> Aaron Mulder writes:
Aaron> I just installed the native threads add-on to the 1.1.7 JRE
Aaron> and whenever I try to use it (jre -native test) I get the
Aaron> following result:
Aaron> Cannot open /proc/02891 for GCCould not create Java VM
Aaron> Where the proc number
Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
> I just installed the native threads add-on to the 1.1.7 JRE and
> whenever I try to use it (jre -native test) I get the following result:
>
> Cannot open /proc/02891 for GCCould not create Java VM
>
> Where the proc number changes every time... I'm using
>
> Personally, I'd be interested to see info about non-Blackdown free
> JVMs. We don't hear too much about them on this list. That would
> have been an interesting comparison.
>
I ran the JVMSpec98 benchmarks from the cmdline to see how Kaffe
measures up against other JVMs.
Here's the estim
I just installed the native threads add-on to the 1.1.7 JRE and
whenever I try to use it (jre -native test) I get the following result:
Cannot open /proc/02891 for GCCould not create Java VM
Where the proc number changes every time... I'm using Red Hat
6.1 on a 2-processor syste
15 matches
Mail list logo