> > And why are you asking this list about it? Linux could never be run
>> on a Macintosh Classic either.
>
>Au contraire!
>
>http://www.mac.linux-m68k.org/
I'm aware of this project, but if you look at the list of supported
machines, it does not include the original Macintosh, Mac Plus, Mac
In a message dated 9/8/01 3:25:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< And why are you asking this list about it? Linux could never be run
on a Macintosh Classic either. >>
Yes I was speaking about Mac OS9. I currently can develop Java on it using
Apple's MRJ SDK. It is compliant with Java 1.1
>Is it feasible to develop Java 1.2+ compliant code on a Mac classic computer?
> Please advise or point to web sites with supporting information. Thank you.
No, it isn't. In fact, it isn't even possible to develop Java 1.2+
compliant code on a modern Mac, unless it is running OSX. There has
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Kevin Ryan / KNB wrote:
> Baloney. "javac -version" doesn't work anywhere, because the
> "-version" is an option to "java", not to "javac".
Yeah, I only realised this was the case 10 minutes ago.
Anyway, looks like the problem is with OpenOffice's configure script. For
some
This is the kind of thing that really slows down Java development!
And some try to say that open source developers have a bias against
Java!
Nonsense. I understand that we are all constrained by larger forces here
and that Sun doesn't have it in them to go all the way (i.e. GPL).
If those of you
Hi guys
Just discovered to my horror that the configure script in OpenOffice
relies on passing '-version' to javac to check that it is the right
software to use with it. This problem seen on both intel and sparc
platforms (1.3.1 and 1.3.0 respectively).
Any plans to sort this out? Doing 'javac -
Is it feasible to develop Java 1.2+ compliant code on a Mac classic computer?
Please advise or point to web sites with supporting information. Thank you.
Gerard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
