Re: To use Sniff+... Re: Version for GlibC

1999-11-16 Thread Andreas Jaeger
time) and you can not just place the libraries in another location. It might work - but it might also fail in subtle ways. Putting them in /usr/lib and /lib will break your libc5 system. Either install glibc as a secondary lib (read the HowTo and the FAQ), or

Re: Version for GlibC

1999-11-10 Thread Andreas Jaeger
ing SuSE here) is libc5 - RedHat 6.0 is glibc 2.1. > The latest glibc is 2.1.2 and will be on SuSE 6.3. >> >> >6.1 is glibc2.0 and >> > 6.2 is based on glibc2.1, >> and 6.3 is glibc 2.1.2 >> >

Re: Version for GlibC

1999-11-08 Thread Andreas Jaeger
t al. [...] > I couldn't answer it satisfactorily when asked me this morning. > ( I haven't downloaded JDK pre 1.2 release yet, because 1.1.7v1a > works perfectly fin on SuSE Linux 6.1 which I assume is glibc2.0 anyway.) 6.1 comes with 2.0.7 Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger Su

Re: JDK 1.2 library problem

1999-09-21 Thread Andreas Jaeger
_2.0' > > It looks like if I forgot a library but which one ? > Is it an installation problem ? Yes. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] for pgp-key finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: What's so platform dependent with Java2 source?

1999-06-28 Thread Andreas Jaeger
;m one of the glibc developers[1] I might try to help get some of these into glibc. Andreas Footnotes: [1] But I don't know enough about linuxthreads to help directly. -- Andreas Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] for pgp-key finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: Installation of glibc (was: JDK1.2 on Slackware3.5 problems)

1999-06-27 Thread Andreas Jaeger
est will be found with ld.so.cache. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] for pgp-key finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Installation of glibc (was: JDK1.2 on Slackware3.5 problems)

1999-06-27 Thread Andreas Jaeger
k is still valid). > How well do the distribution upgrades handle the migration to a new > glibc? The distributions should do well but using a distribution means AFAIK updating your complete system. > Anyone here have some relevant experience? I'm only a glibc developer - and only

Re: RedHat 6, JDK 1.2. native threads & JNI

1999-06-06 Thread Andreas Jaeger
l paths (as above). When compiling new programs against glibc 2.1, you've got to specify the correct paths to the compiler (option -I with gcc) and linker (options --dynamic-linker, -L and --rpath). -- Andreas Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] for pgp-key finger [EMAIL PRO

Re: Information of the glibc-2.1 status on the i386 platform

1999-04-12 Thread Andreas Jaeger
>>>>> Johan writes: Johan> On 11 Apr 1999, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> I'm running (thanks to the tips in this list!) jdk 1.2pre1 with glibc >> 2.1. I'm using small wrapper scripts to set the required options, >> e.g.: >> $ cat

Re: Information of the glibc-2.1 status on the i386 platform

1999-04-11 Thread Andreas Jaeger
-Djava.compiler= $* $ cat bin/appletviewer #!/bin/sh /opt/jdk1.2/bin/appletviewer -green -J-Djava.compiler= $* I just run a few programs and so far everything works for me. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] for pgp-key finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: Java on RedHat Linux 5.2 with glibc-2.0.110

1999-02-08 Thread Andreas Jaeger
ll solve your problem here). glibc 2.1 doesn't fix that problem[1] - and I've been also unsuccessful trying JDK 1.1.6 with glibc 2.1 :-(. Andreas Footnotes: [1] since the problem is in JDK - otherwise glibc 2.1 contains a number of fixes;-) -- Andreas Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: JDK can't work with recent glibc

1999-01-28 Thread Andreas Jaeger
ting off-topic now. Please reply via personal email. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] for pgp-key finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: JDK can't work with recent glibc

1999-01-28 Thread Andreas Jaeger
blackdown developers told me that this will be fixed in JDK 1.2. The problem is that the JDK port uses an internal symbol (_dl_symbol_value) instead of dlsym - and this internal symbol isn't available in glibc 2.1 (2.0.110 is a test release of glibc 2.1). Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] for pgp-key finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: InetAddr.getLocalHost() [glibc?] bug workaround

1998-06-20 Thread Andreas Jaeger
ats.gnu.org:8080/cgi-bin/wwwgnats.pl - and I know that you, Roland, knows that but I'm not sure about the other recipients of this message. You can read my conversion with Christoper in the bug database. -- Andreas Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] for pgp-key finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: InetAddr.getLocalHost() [glibc?] bug workaround

1998-06-17 Thread Andreas Jaeger
program showing the bug - trying to fix a bug which might be in JDK, glibc or whatever might be impossible. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] for pgp-key finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]