Re: Where/When is a new release? (Big News!)

1999-09-07 Thread Nigel Gamble
nderstand how > > to work around the problems. > > But I can not find this new version. Is there a new version already? No, a new version hasn't yet been released. This is just a progress report. Nigel Gamble[

Re: netscape 4.61, Java, Redhat 6.0

1999-07-23 Thread Nigel Gamble
epetition.html > are killing it. Try it yourself - run the applet, click and hold in > the window and drag around awhile. (Enjoy the pretty circles). For me, > after about 15 seconds of this, Netscape locks up solid. Same here, with Netscape 4.61 running on Debian uns

Re: source

1999-04-06 Thread Nigel Gamble
ase is available now. There are still various bugs to fix. Nigel Gamble[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mountain View, CA, USA. http://www.nrg.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

Re: Non mofit AWT.

1999-04-06 Thread Nigel Gamble
possible? Yes. I'm working on an implementation using GTK+. Nigel Gamble[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mountain View, CA, USA. http://www.nrg.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Re: Non mofit AWT.

1999-04-04 Thread Nigel Gamble
n product - the JavaStation. The JavaStation uses Java for everything - including the windowing system, the OS (JavaOS) and all the device drivers. Nigel Gamble[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mountain View, CA, USA. http://www.nrg.org/ ---

Re: Non mofit AWT.

1999-04-03 Thread Nigel Gamble
ly, they are all too busy with the actual porting to be able to help with this project.) Cheers, Nigel Nigel Gamble[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mountain View, CA, USA. http://www.nrg.org/ --

Re: null layout?

1999-03-08 Thread Nigel Gamble
al X server), so I think this is probably a bug in the Motif AWT peers on Linux. I also tried it using my prototype GTK AWT peers, and the label did appear (although I don't think it was in quite the right place, so I also have a bug). Nigel Gamble[EMAI

Re: A Java VM that uses svgalib?

1999-03-03 Thread Nigel Gamble
AWT peers. See the directory sun/awt/tiny in the JDK 1.1 sources. Basically, all you would have to do is to implement all of the native methods declared in Tiny AWT in terms of svgalib function. However, I don't believe that any work has been done to allow Tiny to support Java 2. This would

Re: SUN "supports" Java on Linux

1999-02-09 Thread Nigel Gamble
m not sure. I couldn't find any on java.sun.com. However, COMPILER_VERSION has changed from 5 in JDK1.1 to 6 in JDK1.2. This version number is "updated whenever there are changes to the interface between the interpreter and JIT compilers". Nigel Gamble

Re: SUN "supports" Java on Linux

1999-02-07 Thread Nigel Gamble
On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, Wim Ceulemans wrote: > Can the sunwjit be used in combination with the latest JDK1.1.x on Linux? No, the JIT interface in Java 2 is very different from that in JDK1.1. Nigel Gamble[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mountain View, CA,

Re: GTK+ AWT peers (was: KDE L&F ?)

1999-01-20 Thread Nigel Gamble
On 20 Jan 1999, Brian Jones wrote: > Nigel Gamble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Aaron Gaudio wrote: > > > How about a GTK+ AWT peer, along with the ability to set this as the default > > > to remove the dependancy on Motif, and thus cut dow

GTK+ AWT peers (was: KDE L&F ?)

1999-01-20 Thread Nigel Gamble
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Aaron Gaudio wrote: > How about a GTK+ AWT peer, along with the ability to set this as the default > to remove the dependancy on Motif, and thus cut down a little on bloat? I'm working on this. It is based on the JDK1.2 port, so don't expect it any time soo

Re: finalize() again

1999-01-05 Thread Nigel Gamble
t be fixed. x@x 1998-04-07" This refers to "class" finalization, not the usual "object" finalization. There would be a static finalize() method that would be called when the class itself was garbage collected. This is what is referred to as "never implemente

Re: Will SWING be included in the Linux version of Java 1.2?

1998-12-29 Thread Nigel Gamble
On Tue, 29 Dec 1998, Kontorotsui wrote: > As I say in the subject, can you confirm that SWING will be part of the JDK 1.2 > for Linux? Yes. Swing is a standard part of Java 2 (formerly known as JDK1.2). Nigel Gamble[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mountain View, C

Re: Using "setSize" with a Frame.

1998-11-30 Thread Nigel Gamble
r to follow. If you want your code to be portable, and to do what you expect on all platforms, I would suggest never using Frame.setSize(); instead you should set the sizes of the components inside the Frame and let the Frame pack around them as necessary. Nigel Gamble[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mountain View, CA, USA. http://www.nrg.org/

GTK+ AWT peer library for Java

1998-11-09 Thread Nigel Gamble
happen to work on Java at Sun, so I have access to the JDK1.2 sources, although this is not an offical Sun project - I'm strictly doing it in my spare time. I hope to have something of alpha quality, that other developers can also work on, by the time JDK1.2 is rel