". Could someone please verify this file?
You're right. Calvin, this is a problem inherited from the Sun source,
the jdk/jre licenses are broken in the 07-fcs code.
Juergen
--
~~~
NOTICE: This email message is for
Lots of difficult questions here. Joining the blackdown porting project
means you use the blackdown binary license etc.
If you want to talk to someone at Sun let me know and I'll forward your
questions on
regards
calvin
Marc St-Jean wrote:
>On Jan 7, 2005, at 12:58 PM, Dominic Duv
regards
calvin
Don Appleman wrote:
Good afternoon --
I'm new to the list, but first looked through the archives and found nothing
on this issue.
I'm running Fedora core 3 on amd64, with kernel 2.6.9-1.667. There is no
javaws bundled with Sun's amd64 JDK1.5.0, and the i386 java
e are slower methods of access so may also hide a race condition too
regards
calvin
Richard -Gilligan- Uschold wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the correct place to report this, but I
couldn't find a bug report link.
I could submit to Sun, but I've done that several times in the
help a great deal.
regards
calvin
Joseph Shraibman wrote:
I have. I reported it to sun and they said if they had a repoducable
test case they would open a bug. But I could never figure out how to
reproduce it.
Veda N Ponnusamy wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm posting this, since I know I can get
Join me, Hui Huang and the one and only, Juergen Kreileder of
blackdown.org
in a JDC chat next week!
see below for more details
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/community/chat/
regards
calvin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
multiplexing IO feature instead?
regards
calvin
Marco Trevisan wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I also use Tomcat (v4.0.4), and I have run my webapp with a variety of
> JVMs in order to find which is best in terms of performance.
> It could be important to point that my Java code confo
No news is good news. Juergen has got some 1.4.1 beta builds in testing
regards
calvin
Vincent Touquet wrote:
>
> Is there still anyone from the blackdown project active on this list ? :)
>
> Only mails I've been getting so far , is "I'm away on holiday&qu
wn a while
back
regards
calvin
Jesse Stockall wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 04:44, Craig O'Shannessy wrote:
> >
> > Sun JDK 1.4.0
> > Sun JDK 1.3.1
> > Sun JDK 1.3.1_03
> > IBM JDK 1.3.1_01 (had to use "LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5" for smp machi
27;t worry.
(cd /usr/local/mozilla/plugins; rm libjavaplugin_oji.so; ln -s
/usr/java/j2re1.4.0/plugin/i386/ns610/libjavaplugin_oji140.so
libjavaplugin_oji.so)
regards
calvin
Walter Logeman wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have Mozilla working in Linux. It seems to work on some things
> th
try one of the old gotchas
ulimit -s 2048
> Barnet Wagman wrote:
>
> With Blackdown j2sdk-1.3.1-02a-FCS-linux-i386, I get the following when I
> run 'java -version'
>
> java version "1.3.1"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
> Blackdown-1.3.1-02a-FCS)
>
them into a blackdown release first
regards
calvin
Vladimir G Ivanovic wrote:
>
> "MK" == Matthew Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> MK> What differences are there between Sun's JVM and Blackdowns?
>
> I asked the same question privately of a m
Redhat 7.0? If so either upgrade or get the rh 7.0 patches from
their website. Some large apps also need the C stack size to be reset
ulimit -s 2048
which is fixed in later glibc builds
regards
calvin
Kunal Bisla wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm trying to run weblogic600sp2_linux.bin in
It could be
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4422213.html
which is a generic hotspot bug but was found on linux :*(
regards
calvin
Alexandre Saur wrote:
>
> Yes, I know... RedHat 7.0 is kind of old now...
> but my glibc is the latest for redhat 7.0 as far
gt; ? Are
> these one and the same ? How about the earlier 1.2.x versions ?
A large percentage of the 1.3.x code is shared which is good for end users
as it gets tested on a larger scale than possible before. Blackdown have
some value add code and do debian packaging etc
regards
calvin
you could be either be seeing a rare JIT bug or alternatively it
could be the change in stack orientation in Redhat 7.1 and other 2.4/glibc
releases. The Sun/blackdown 1.3.1 has fixes for that situation or
alternatively
set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5
regards
calvin
Biju Abraham Mathew wrote:
>
&
I replied to this earlier but it didn't show up to the list. (I've
resubscribed
myself now)
you can remove the messages by running xprop -remove _MOTIF_DEFAULT_BINDINGS
which was set by another motif program
regards
calvin
"Jesus M. Salvo Jr." wrote:
>
> ---
Yes this is a new bug (4458946), its caused by the daemon randomizer thread
not
shutting down in time.
The engineer who has looked into has this workaround for now
add
Runtime.getRuntime().exit(0);
to the end of main
regards
calvin
Timothy Reaves wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
>
I would recommend trying 1.3.1 not only does it have the fix to the wrapper
script below (/usr/bin/cut went to /bin/cut)
But it has many hotspot fixes too. If you fix the cut stuff you will also
need to set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 for 1.3.0 releases
regards
calvin
Homayoun Yousefi'zadeh
have probably the most stable driver for other cards, they have evaluation
downloads there too
regards
calvin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi all ,
> i am trrying to get java to play sounds to my RH7 box.
> i am able to play sounds from native linux apps so i think my sound card is prope
l,
There are bugs logged on the JDC and the workaround above are listed there.
regards
calvin
"Alexander V. Konstantinou" wrote:
>
> I just upgraded a test machine running RedHat 6.2 (with all the latest
> updates) to RedHat 7.1. I'm having trouble getting Sun
you need something
here, copy the directory contents from another system or install XFree which
has them. I have run Java on headless machines using this method
regards
calvin
Timothy Wojtaszek wrote:
>
> Having a problem running anything with swing.
>
> tim@powerpuffer:~/Prog
As of release 1.3.1 all platforms which includes Linux are released on the
same day. I know that only covers x86 but I would guess the ppc version
should be in the same ballpark
The 1.3.1 release is currently in rc form and has better debug support and
is faster again than 1.3.0
regards
calvin
Read the next section in the link I posted yesterday. there is a section
on memory issues with JNI, global references etc
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/onlineTraining/Programming/JDCBook/jniref.html
regards
calvin
Zhihong Pan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When I call my c func
The last element is the initializer for the array, I wrote an example of its
use here
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/onlineTraining/Programming/JDCBook/jnistring.html
regards
calvin
Zhihong Pan wrote:
>
> Could anybody teach me hot to use NewObjectArray in jni ?
&g
its in hex) the last 4 digits are the line number. ie os_linux.cpp 1468
There have been some bugs in relation to null arguments with JNI which
I would guess can be coded around for now
regards
calvin
Joi Ellis wrote:
>
> On 9 Apr 2001, Zhihong Pan wrote:
>
> > When I c
n the expected result.
regards
calvin
Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> Hi,
> looks like System.exit(1) doesn't cause the java executable to
> terminate with an exit status of 1 with the Blackdown 1.3.0.
> It works fine with the IBM 1.3.0, though. Here's my test program:
>
>
There are some 1.3 hotspot related jdb bugs for example the one listed
below. If you happen to come across one I would recommend using the classic
VM (jdb -classic) until those bugs are fixed
regards
calvin
Joi Ellis wrote:
>
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote:
>
>
year.
If you are seeing segfaults then I would suggest using the patched
motif from openmotif.org, you need the development tree version.
rt.jar is a release bundle, for development you can just use the classes
in the build/classes directory.
regards
calvin
Brian Craft wrote:
>
> (res
I've raised the priority of the bug in question, I don't think we have
a test case we can reproduce yet with this bug, so if anyone has
something
then please forward it on
regards
calvin
Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>
> Vote for:
> http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParad
e bug report.
If the ip address field is not used then the server gets the broadcast
packets
(it works) If the address is used then it doesn't. I'm thinking that
this
may be trapped elsewhere and not in Java
regards
calvin
Jason Gilbert wrote:
>
> 3) Bug 4191980
> (http:
a
regards
calvin
>I program desktop graphics for a large company (Disney). We develop in
>part on Linux and deploy on SGI, but possibly linux in the future.
>Elsewhere in the company there are mac clients with sun servers, etc.
>
>My two issues:
>
>1) FONTS. The fonts look d
frame decoration. That
was a wrong assumption but introduce the insets concept :*(
regards
calvin
>I'll second that.
>
>But, /pace/ Joi, it's not the window managers that are incompatible with
>Java, it's Java that's incompatible with Unix window managers.
>
>App
for you.
You can email me directly but if you have information that
would be interesting to other developers, like adoption of
linux at your company or school then maybe those could be
sent to the alias as well
regards
calvin
calvin
>At 18:11 10/30/00 -0800, noisebrain wrote:
>>This (the license) does not negate the fact that the source is available
>>and can be changed.
>
>actually it does. What can you (legally) do with that changed source?
>Nothing. Can you give it to me in binary form? no. C
Yes this is a horrible side effect of a fix for key press/key release
events requested by an ISVs
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4371923.html
It is committed to be fixed
regards
calvin
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Joi" == Joi E
it is trying to gain access to a monitor lock
regards
calvin
For general stack trace analysis see Advanced Programming for the Java 2
platform
that I co-wrote (Austin/pawlan)
yangyuexiang wrote:
>
> Hi, everyone,
>
> When I ran java program in linux, when I type C_\, the threads wer
=/usr/local/myhome
but if you need to do that you may as well install the tar .sh version
regards
calvin
Mohd Mokhtar wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just like Nigel Jewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, I've downloaded the
> Linux JDK 1.3RC1 .sh file from Sun's website into my Linux
the later versions of linux pthreads are more
stable on SMP
I would tell you a number but they are all called version 0.8 :*(
regards
calvin
Java Linux wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We're running Red Hat Linux 6.1, kernel 2.2.12 and
> glibc 2.1.2 on Pentium SMP machines. Af
This is a hotspot problem with SUSE, not a blackdown issue really, but there
is a workaround and it will be fixed in the next suse release
see the release notes :*)
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/earlyAccess/j2sdk13/relnotes-linux.html
regards
calvin
>Hello,
>
>when I s
)
regards
calvin
Joi Ellis wrote:
>
> Julio Cesar Aguilar Cabrera wrote:
> >
> > I'm using RedHat, XFree 3.3.6, and the latest IBM JDK 1.3 beta.
> > When I started writing visual programs in Java I noticed some
> > problems which I believe to be caused by AfterStep
/java
break main
run -jar Java2Demo.jar
handle SIGUSR1 nostop noprint pass
handle SIGSEGV nostop noprint pass
handle SIGILL nostop noprint pass
handle SIGQUIT nostop noprint pass
regards
calvin
Kris Heyrman wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think I am getting stupid: I just spent a day trying to fin
Same here, I've been running Bang for 40 minutes on a dual PIII 600mhz
with the latest 1.3 build with RH 6.1, I'm going to let it run over the
weekend
There was some bugs I believe in early glibc 2.1.3 builds
regards
calvin
Scott Murray wrote:
>
> Michael Thome wrote:
>
nager. I would
suggest the following steps. Verify your program works locally, then
locally with rmi and then remotely with rmi. You could run strace -f -p
on rmiregistry or attach jdb to rmiregistry (I believe you can start it in
debug mode)
regards
calvin
>
>I have made a RMI server tha
Submit it as a bug and/or send us the short example, it could very well be
another linuxthreads bug that we will have to work around or someone has
already discovered.
Java is one of the best stress tests of the linux threads library :*)
regards
calvin
>
>I've been unable to ge
There is a known bug list where this is listed, in a nutshell src.jar
is actually a gzip archive, run unzip or gunzip to extract the files
from that archive for this release.
regards
calvin
>Did anyone else get an exception when unjaring this f
.
regards
calvin
> Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 08:28:56 -0600 (MDT)
> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:26:26 -0400
> From: Timothy Reaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: java-linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Odd seg fault
Depending on what type of embedding you are doing, but you may find J2SE
works. I don't know of the release date of J2ME on linux so I've forwarded
your email to those engineers
regards
calvin
>Hi
>
>I try to embed Linux in a device and I also want to run java (includ
hoping that we can move
the blackdown port to jdk1.2.2 when the current issues have been resolved.
regards
calvin
>
>Hi Steve and the Java-Linux team,
>
>We've been running into some strange crashes and native thread problems
>with JDK 1.2 on a glibc-2.1.1 system (two-way x
rting the Java VM isn't easy, its a large, often tightly OS coupled piece of
software. You can help accelerate the development by testing it, you have
the source so you may even be able to find the fix for any bugs you find.
Ask not what Linux can do for you, but what you can do for Linux.
rega
50 matches
Mail list logo