Re: [Partially OT] A Java parser - part 2

Michael Emmel wrote: > Vincent Risi wrote: > > > Andreas Rueckert wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > On Thu, 18 Nov 1999 Paul Mclachlan wrote: > > > > > > The next problem occured when I wanted 2 parsers to use the same base classes > > > for the AST. Never managed to do that, and I couldn't patc

Re: [Partially OT] A Java parser - part 2

What about EBNF? That's pretty standardized, no? Ted Neward http://www.javageeks.com/~tneward On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Michael Emmel wrote: > Vincent Risi wrote: > > > Andreas Rueckert wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > On Thu, 18 Nov 1999 Paul Mclachlan wrote: > > > > > > The next problem occured

Re: [Partially OT] A Java parser - part 2

Vincent Risi wrote: > Andreas Rueckert wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > On Thu, 18 Nov 1999 Paul Mclachlan wrote: > > > > The next problem occured when I wanted 2 parsers to use the same base classes > > for the AST. Never managed to do that, and I couldn't patch JavaCC, since there > > were no sources a

Re: [Partially OT] A Java parser - part 2

Andreas Rueckert wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu, 18 Nov 1999 Paul Mclachlan wrote: > > The next problem occured when I wanted 2 parsers to use the same base classes > for the AST. Never managed to do that, and I couldn't patch JavaCC, since there > were no sources available. TLA's are fine if you kno

Re: [Partially OT] A Java parser - part 2

Hi! On Fri, 19 Nov 1999 Louis Tribble wrote: >| You may use the Software to generate software program(s) ("Developed >| Programs"). Sun claims no rights in or to the Developed Programs. > >Note especially the last sentence. So you changed your license? I remember that Sreeni said on the

Re: [Partially OT] A Java parser - part 2

Andreas Rueckert wrote: > I've used JJTree a while ago and had some problems. It started with the simple > fact, that the Java grammar and all derived work was copyrighted by Metamata, > so I couldn't include it in my work. Make sure this copyright has changed, if > you want to share your work. J

Re: [Partially OT] A Java parser - part 2

Andreas Rueckert wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu, 18 Nov 1999 Paul Mclachlan wrote: > > > > >Having said that, if I wanted to do something like this, I would use > >JavaCC, or, specifically, the "jjtree" tool in JavaCC. jjtree will > >automatically parse the file into an OO structure ready for mani

Re: [Partially OT] A Java parser - part 2

Hi! On Thu, 18 Nov 1999 Paul Mclachlan wrote: >Having said that, if I wanted to do something like this, I would use >JavaCC, or, specifically, the "jjtree" tool in JavaCC. jjtree will >automatically parse the file into an OO structure ready for manipulation. >(ie, you might set it up to c

Re: [Partially OT] A Java parser - part 2

> "Andrea" == Kontorotsui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andrea> What I want to do is a tool that "flattens" the class Andrea> hierachy to improve performance. Try JAX (from http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com). It does exactly what you want. Unfortunately, the JAX project is no longer su

Re: [Partially OT] A Java parser - part 2

Kontorotsui wrote: > Hello, > first of all many thanks to all the people who kindly answered. > > I've collected many different advices on Java parsers, so maybe it is wiser to > explain my purpose. > I noticed that java performance decreases dramatically as more and more classes > and ob

Re: [Partially OT] A Java parser - part 2

At 18:43 11 Nov 1999 +0100, Kontorotsui wrote: > What I want to do is a tool that "flattens" the class hierachy to improve > performance. In this way I'll be able to write properly structured code but the > tool will cut away performance-wise useless classes and method before I compile. > I know

[Partially OT] A Java parser - part 2

Hello, first of all many thanks to all the people who kindly answered. I've collected many different advices on Java parsers, so maybe it is wiser to explain my purpose. I noticed that java performance decreases dramatically as more and more classes and object instances are created. F