Re: Delivering Java Apps

1999-05-18 Thread Nathan Meyers
Oooh... I never meant to inflict pain and suffering :-). I guess Sun gets the credit for this one, rendering a few zillion shell scripts obsolete when users upgrade :-(. Java will be stable R.S.N. :-) Nathan Chris Abbey wrote: > > ARGH! I guess that's what I get for > living in the world of "

Re: Delivering Java Apps

1999-05-18 Thread Chris Abbey
.. it even accepts the -cp option in 1.2. > >Nathan > >- Original Message - >From: Chris Abbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Monday, May 17, 1999 9:36 PM >Subject: Re: Delivering Java Apps > > >> Which brings up another point, unless

Re: Delivering Java Apps

1999-05-17 Thread Nathan Meyers
9:36 PM Subject: Re: Delivering Java Apps > Which brings up another point, unless your application is targeted > to your fellow developers, use jre over java... not only are > you gaurenteed that if they have even a minimal runtime it'll work, > but (and someone please back me

Re: Delivering Java Apps

1999-05-17 Thread Chris Abbey
Missed this thread when it happened... At 10:33 AM 5/16/99 -0400, Stephen Martin wrote: [...] >So my question is this, given a fairly simple java app (ie no native >methods, no rmi, no jdbc...). What is the best way for an end user >to run it without having it hog all the resources on their syste

Re: Delivering Java Apps

1999-05-16 Thread Godmar Back
> > In regards to setting minimum and maximum stack sizes, a "good value" is > really dependent on your application. If you're doing alot of file IO or > very intense computations, you might want to set those numbers fairly > high. The only way to really determine how much memory to explicitly >

Re: Delivering Java Apps

1999-05-16 Thread Jeff Galyan
Godmar Back wrote: > > I just like to address your reference to Kaffe being a personal java > environment. > After lurking a while on this list, I'm starting to realize that Kaffe's > labeling as "PersonalJava" is an unfortunate one. > > PersonalJava (http://www.javasoft.com/products/personalja

Re: Delivering Java Apps

1999-05-16 Thread Jeff Galyan
Stephen Martin wrote: > > Ok, so i've got my application written and packaged into a jar file > and it's ready to ship. What is the best way to use it in the target > system? Just running java my.class sparks up a 77 Meg 1.2 jvm on > my system which seems pretty heavy weight for a simple applicat

Re: Delivering Java Apps

1999-05-16 Thread Godmar Back
I just like to address your reference to Kaffe being a personal java environment. After lurking a while on this list, I'm starting to realize that Kaffe's labeling as "PersonalJava" is an unfortunate one. PersonalJava (http://www.javasoft.com/products/personaljava/) http://www.javasoft.com/pr

Delivering Java Apps

1999-05-16 Thread Stephen Martin
Ok, so i've got my application written and packaged into a jar file and it's ready to ship. What is the best way to use it in the target system? Just running java my.class sparks up a 77 Meg 1.2 jvm on my system which seems pretty heavy weight for a simple application. I'm aware of the -Xms and -X