Compatibility problems with IBM JDK?

2001-06-18 Thread kevin1
I'm using the sun jdk for a j2ee project. I'm interested in switching to the ibm jdk. They are supposed to be interchangable, no? Can I successfully do this? What problems would I run into? Thanks in advance Kevin ---

Re: Missing message (Was: address for ibm jdk bugs?)

2001-01-08 Thread Joi Ellis
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Vladimir G Ivanovic wrote: > Joi, > > I don't know anything about the circumstances surrounding this incident, > but could there be another explanation for your post being missing? For > instance, a crash followed by a backup could conceivably look like > someone deleted you

Re: Missing message (Was: address for ibm jdk bugs?)

2001-01-07 Thread Vladimir G Ivanovic
Joi, I don't know anything about the circumstances surrounding this incident, but could there be another explanation for your post being missing? For instance, a crash followed by a backup could conceivably look like someone deleted your posting. Just asking. ---Vladimir Vladimir G. Ivanovic

Re: address for ibm jdk bugs?

2001-01-07 Thread Joi Ellis
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Mo DeJong wrote: > Go to the news server: > > news.software.ibm.com > > The newsgroup is: > > ibm.software.java.linux After you post, go back a day or so later and see if your post is still there. I went there about 6 months ago to report a big problem using the debugger

Re: address for ibm jdk bugs?

2001-01-07 Thread Scott Murray
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, noisebrain wrote: > Hello, > > does anyone know an email address at ibm that would be interested > seeing bug reports in their jdk? I have one that happens in theirs > but not in blackdown or sun. No email address that I could find, but the "Reporting Problems" section in t

Re: address for ibm jdk bugs?

2001-01-07 Thread Mo DeJong
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, noisebrain wrote: > > Hello, > > does anyone know an email address at ibm that would be interested > seeing bug reports in their jdk? I have one that happens in theirs > but not in blackdown or sun. Go to the news server: news.software.ibm.com The newsgroup is: ibm.sof

address for ibm jdk bugs?

2001-01-07 Thread noisebrain
Hello, does anyone know an email address at ibm that would be interested seeing bug reports in their jdk? I have one that happens in theirs but not in blackdown or sun. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

IBM jdk problem

2001-01-07 Thread John Plate
Hi I installed the IBMJava2-13 according to the instructions. When invoking "java" I get: sigaltstack: Function not implemented Can anyone help? Thanks! -- John Plate -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

Does it work IBM JDK 1.3 and SuSE Linux 6.4 ?

2000-06-06 Thread Peter Pilgrim
Segmentation fault > > This is the answer :) > What about IBM's version? Does the IBM JDK 1.3 work with SuSe 6.4 ? -- mfg Peter == "The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was making everyone in the world

Re: Red Hat, Caldera, TurboLinux to bundle IBM JDK!

2000-01-25 Thread kornel c
That is beautiful! Especially because IBM's JDK-s have the reputation to be very fast. -kornel - Original Message - From: "Nelson Minar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 11:59 AM Subject: Red Hat, Caldera, TurboLinu

Red Hat, Caldera, TurboLinux to bundle IBM JDK!

2000-01-25 Thread Nelson Minar
(I posted this yesterday, didn't come through). Wow, this is huge news http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/2124/tc/2125062.html Here's the meat of it. This is amazing. Sun's really missed the boat with Java on Linux, and IBM has neatly hopped on it. ---

Re: IBM JDK 1.3.0 preview 1Q 2000!

1999-11-23 Thread Riyad Kalla
Isn't this EXACTLY what he said in the 1st place? Peter Pilgrim wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > According to the following IBM link ( > > http://www.ibm.com/java/jdk/other/portingplans.html ) JDK 1.3.0 preview > > for Linux will be available 1Q 2000 with GA early 2Q 2000! Yes! > > > >

Re: IBM JDK 1.3.0 preview 1Q 2000!

1999-11-23 Thread Peter Pilgrim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > According to the following IBM link ( > http://www.ibm.com/java/jdk/other/portingplans.html ) JDK 1.3.0 preview > for Linux will be available 1Q 2000 with GA early 2Q 2000! Yes! > No it definitely reads EARLY SECOND QUARTER with GA if GA == General Announcement.

IBM JDK 1.3.0 preview 1Q 2000!

1999-11-22 Thread Avi Schwartz
According to the following IBM link ( http://www.ibm.com/java/jdk/other/portingplans.html ) JDK 1.3.0 preview for Linux will be available 1Q 2000 with GA early 2Q 2000! Yes! Avi -- Avi Schwartz Get a Life [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Linux

Re: Swing with ibm jdk 1.1.8

1999-11-09 Thread Daniel P. Zepeda
I think you have to set JAVA_HOME to /path/to/jdk118 Thus spake Pere Serra on Tue, 09 Nov 1999: > I've downloaded ibm jdk 1.1.8 and it works with text mode programs, but when I > try to run a swing application it doesn't work. I put the file rt.jar in the > classpath then

Re: Swing with ibm jdk 1.1.8

1999-11-09 Thread Nathan Meyers
Pere Serra wrote: > > I've downloaded ibm jdk 1.1.8 and it works with text mode programs, but when I > try to run a swing application it doesn't work. I put the file rt.jar in the > classpath then java says Class not found: java.lang.System. > > Does anyone know wha

Re: Swing with ibm jdk 1.1.8

1999-11-09 Thread Peter Graves
Try putting swingall.jar in your CLASSPATH, rather than rt.jar. Works for me. -Peter Pere Serra wrote: > > I've downloaded ibm jdk 1.1.8 and it works with text mode programs, but when I > try to run a swing application it doesn't work. I put the file rt.jar in the > cl

Swing with ibm jdk 1.1.8

1999-11-09 Thread Pere Serra
I've downloaded ibm jdk 1.1.8 and it works with text mode programs, but when I try to run a swing application it doesn't work. I put the file rt.jar in the classpath then java says Class not found: java.lang.System. Does anyone know what am I doing wrong ? Th

Re: Serialization with Ibm jdk???

1999-10-27 Thread Jørgen H. Seland
quot;. > > My question is: What java SUPPOSED to do with class like this. I haven't seen > it in documentation but I guess it should just ignore static fields. > Do I have to make static fields ALWAYS explicitly TRANSIENT? > > Thanks. No; I would suspect this is a bug i

Re: Serialization with Ibm jdk???

1999-10-27 Thread Juergen Kreileder
> andrey writes: andrey> Hi, All! andrey> I just noticed a little problem: When I tried to serialize andrey> class with "private static int xxx" IBM's jdk hung andrey> (Blackdown's didn't :) ) andrey> It works fine if I make it "private transient static int andrey>

Serialization with Ibm jdk???

1999-10-27 Thread andrey
Hi, All! I just noticed a little problem: When I tried to serialize class with "private static int xxx" IBM's jdk hung (Blackdown's didn't :) ) It works fine if I make it "private transient static int xxx". My question is: What java SUPPOSED to do with class like this. I haven't seen it in do

Re: Downloading the IBM JDK 1.1.8. Any Luck?

1999-09-21 Thread John N. Alegre
Actually I think it depends on the day or the phase of the moon or somesuch. I just tried it again, same browser, same mime types and it worked first try. ?? john On 20-Sep-99 Pete Toscano wrote: > likewise. i tried the "if you experience a problem" link too, but that > was useless. > > p

Downloading the IBM JDK 1.1.8. Any Luck?

1999-09-19 Thread John N. Alegre
I have had no luck downloading the JDK 1.1.8 from IBM. Connection to alphaWorks site is fine. I set a MIME type in Netscape as Description: GNUZiped File Mime Type: application-x/compressed Suffixes:.gz .tgz and checked the "save to disk" radio button. No luck. After completing the reg

Re: IBM-jdk Where can I get it

1999-07-08 Thread Nathan Meyers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Where can I download the JDK from IBM for Linux? http://alphaworks.ibm.com Look for the JVM link -- you can't miss it. Nathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "uns

RE: IBM-jdk Where can I get it

1999-07-08 Thread Aravind Selvaraje
http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/linuxjvm > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 8 July 1999 23:37 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: IBM-jdk Where can I get it > > > > Where can I download

Re: IBM-jdk Where can I get it

1999-07-08 Thread sgee
Where can I download the JDK from IBM for Linux? _ Steve Gee Java Developer Maxor National Pharmacies Information Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] 806.324.5540 www.maxor.com 806.324.5400 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Re: IBM-jdk

1999-07-08 Thread yves
Linux. > > thanks. > > Justin. > > jools enticknap wrote: > > > >Anybody played around with the IBM-JDK for Linux? I've run one > > >test-program that creates 10 threads, allocates an array and puts some > > >random numbers in that array. It see

Re: IBM-jdk

1999-07-08 Thread Thomas M. Sasala
Justin, I recently upgraded a RH 5.1 system to RH 6.0 without too much difficultly. I sort of did the brute force method. I downloaded all the new RPMs and then installed them one by one, saving most of the libs for last. Then I quickly rebooted. Aside from a small networking problem

Re: IBM-jdk

1999-07-08 Thread jools enticknap
>how would you go about upgrading from glibc 2.0 to 2.1. >(it is glibc2.0 in redhat5.1, is it?) and is it a trivial matter, >or can it be very messy? I'm relatively new in Linux. It's not for the faint hearted, and it can get a bit messy. Use a 2.1 based distribution if you can. Check out the n

Re: IBM-jdk

1999-07-08 Thread Chris Woods
jools enticknap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > P.S. > > Please note that IBM have only appeared to have released a version for glibc > 2.1 NOT 2.0. So don't bother unless you are running suse 6.1 or Redhat 6.0 > or a glibc 2.1 based system. Hmm, this is not what I would think, since I'm running

Re: IBM-jdk

1999-07-08 Thread Justin Lawler
how would you go about upgrading from glibc 2.0 to 2.1. (it is glibc2.0 in redhat5.1, is it?) and is it a trivial matter, or can it be very messy? I'm relatively new in Linux. thanks. Justin. jools enticknap wrote: > >Anybody played around with the IBM-JDK for Linux? I've

Re: IBM-jdk

1999-07-08 Thread jools enticknap
>Anybody played around with the IBM-JDK for Linux? I've run one >test-program that creates 10 threads, allocates an array and puts some >random numbers in that array. It seems extremely fast. It beats kaffe >(by a large margin) and even the SUN-JDK on Solaris (with a

IBM-jdk

1999-07-07 Thread Mark Christiaens
Anybody played around with the IBM-JDK for Linux? I've run one test-program that creates 10 threads, allocates an array and puts some random numbers in that array. It seems extremely fast. It beats kaffe (by a large margin) and even the SUN-JDK on Solaris (with a faster processor)! #

IBM JDK (RE: GC... faster?)

1999-05-23 Thread Aravind Selvaraje
Where can I get IBM JDK for Linux ??? -- Aravind > -Original Message- > From: Sandy Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, 23 May 1999 08:45 > To: Jonas Erikson > Cc: Bryce McKinlay; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: GC... faster? > > > I am not to

Re: ibm jdk 118 and apache jserv

1999-01-02 Thread schen
Hi Aaron, everyone, On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Aaron M. Stromas wrote: > having read how fast the ibm's jvm is i decided to compile apache jserv > with it. unfotunately, i was getting a library load errors, "unsatisfied > symbol: __bzero" in libjava.so. the old trick of defining macro bzero in > term o

ibm jdk 118 and apache jserv

1999-01-02 Thread Aaron M. Stromas
greetings, having read how fast the ibm's jvm is i decided to compile apache jserv with it. unfotunately, i was getting a library load errors, "unsatisfied symbol: __bzero" in libjava.so. the old trick of defining macro bzero in term of memset didn't work this time.  what would be the least intru