Re: IBM JVM Port

1999-04-21 Thread Chris Abbey
>Linux doesn't look at >all like OS/2 (which is a pity), so it might be just as hard -- if not >harder -- to port IBM's JVM to Linux as it is to port Sun's. Let's not forget AIX, VM/ESA, and OS/390's unix services! All three are much closer to Linux

Re: IBM JVM Port

1999-04-21 Thread Charles Forsythe
> What would be the chance on getting > IBM's code ported to Linux or is this the wrong forum to be bringing > this up in. I missed the previous discussion on this topic, so I don't know if this was mentioned. IBM has committed itself to supporting OS/2 by keeping its Java implementation up-to-d

Re: IBM JVM Port

1999-04-20 Thread Chris Abbey
Look back about a week in this list for the answer At 12:32 PM 4/21/99 +1000, Shafiek Savahl wrote: >Hello All > >IBM have just released their version of a JVM for Win32 which they claim >is 30% faster than Hotspot from Sun and also Micrsoft's VM. They also >plan to be giving it away. From

IBM JVM Port

1999-04-20 Thread Shafiek Savahl
Hello All IBM have just released their version of a JVM for Win32 which they claim is 30% faster than Hotspot from Sun and also Micrsoft's VM. They also plan to be giving it away. From what I have heard Sun plans to be charging for their Hotspot product. What would be the chance on getting IBM