On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 01:58:40PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 02:09:30PM -0500, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> > > Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > The main problem I had with Jbuiler (enterprise 3 demo for win
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 02:09:30PM -0500, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> > Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> >
> >
> > The main problem I had with Jbuiler (enterprise 3 demo for windows) was that it
> > wouldn't let me specify a classpath to use in compiling so I co
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 02:09:30PM -0500, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> Paolo Ciccone wrote:
>
>
> The main problem I had with Jbuiler (enterprise 3 demo for windows) was that it
> wouldn't let me specify a classpath to use in compiling so I could not compile my
> program (that used the quicktime js
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 10:11:06AM -0800, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
>
> When we switched to 10% Java code we actually reduced the memory footprint.
Of course this was "...100% java code..." :)
--
Paolo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Paolo Ciccone wrote:
The main problem I had with Jbuiler (enterprise 3 demo for windows) was that it
wouldn't let me specify a classpath to use in compiling so I could not compile my
program (that used the quicktime jsdk from apple).
Also the auto-indent didn't seem to work.
-
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 08:56:07AM -0600, Greg Tomalesky wrote:
> Hi Paolo:
>
> That Solaris edition must be way newer than the demo CD I have:
Yes it is, we actually officially announced it few days ago. PrimeTime, the
code name for the Solaris edition, is a new codebase for JBuilder. The f
> 1) It's a seriously heavy program; it needs around 128 - 256 MB ram for the
> IDE to run smoothly.
> 2) It's still quite unstable (version 2 was hopeless), unless you keep
> strictly to the non-Visual parts of the IDE.
When we switched to 10% Java code we actually reduced the memory footprin
: Paolo Ciccone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Greg Tomalesky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Java-Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 1999 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: IDE's
> On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 04:25:47PM -0600, Greg Tomalesky wrote:
> > Hi:
> >
> >
> The company I work for has asked me to evaluate IDE's for Java,
> and I would like to include those that run under Linux. For the
[snip]
> The no-brainers that made the list right away are Visual Age,
> JBuilder, and NetBeans, because they all run (or will soon) on
> Linu
On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 04:25:47PM -0600, Greg Tomalesky wrote:
> Hi:
>
> JBuilder3 is ok. I has some serious(IMHO) shortcomings. I will
> enumerate:
I'll use the Solaris edition, just released, to answer to this. The Linux
version, under development and demoed at the last LWCE, uses the sam
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: java-linux mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 1999 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: IDE's
> On Fri, Nov 19, 1999 at 07:08:13AM -0600, Glenn Holmer wrote:
> > The no-brainers that made the list right away are Visual Age,
> > JBuild
Glenn Holmer wrote:
> The company I work for has asked me to evaluate IDE's for Java,
> and I would like to include those that run under Linux. For the
> past year, I have been the only Java programmer in the shop, and
> I've put out 30K lines of code using a text edito
>
> The no-brainers that made the list right away are Visual Age,
> JBuilder, and NetBeans, because they all run (or will soon) on
> Linux. Can anybody give opinions or sources of info that will
> help us with this decision? What I want to prepare is a feature-
> for-feature comparison.
>
I
On Fri, Nov 19, 1999 at 07:08:13AM -0600, Glenn Holmer wrote:
> The no-brainers that made the list right away are Visual Age,
> JBuilder, and NetBeans, because they all run (or will soon) on
> Linux. Can anybody give opinions or sources of info that will
> help us with this decision? What I want
yad
Glenn Holmer wrote:
> The company I work for has asked me to evaluate IDE's for Java,
> and I would like to include those that run under Linux. For the
> past year, I have been the only Java programmer in the shop, and
> I've put out 30K lines of code using a text editor
I use AnyJ it is free for linux and have nice features:
1. _Very_ Fast
2. Has dynamic method or class completion for ex, if i type System.out.pr and
CTRL+SPACE it shows pop up where i can select method from output stream class.
3. Goes from method call to its definition.
4. Easy to integrate with
NETBEANS worked fairly well under ( alpha ) linux .
gat
Glenn Holmer wrote:
> JBuilder, and NetBeans, because they all run (or will soon) on
> Linux. Can anybody give opinions or sources of info that will
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
The company I work for has asked me to evaluate IDE's for Java,
and I would like to include those that run under Linux. For the
past year, I have been the only Java programmer in the shop, and
I've put out 30K lines of code using a text editor and javac. We
are looking for something
18 matches
Mail list logo
