> Rachel Greenham writes:
Rachel> Karl Asha wrote:
>>
>> Seems a lot of people have managed to download the plugin in ascii
>> mode. It needs to be explicitly downloaded in binary mode. The version
>> at ftp.tux.org is correct. That site is actually the central mirror
Karl Asha wrote:
>
> Seems a lot of people have managed to download the plugin in ascii
> mode. It needs to be explicitly downloaded in binary mode. The version
> at ftp.tux.org is correct. That site is actually the central mirror
> repository.
OK, the wget one didn't work either, now trying wit
Seems a lot of people have managed to download the plugin in ascii
mode. It needs to be explicitly downloaded in binary mode. The version
at ftp.tux.org is correct. That site is actually the central mirror
repository.
Cheers,
Karl
Rachel Greenham writes:
> Tom Williams wrote:
> >
> > I ha
Tom Williams wrote:
>
> I had this same problem and it was caused by the format of the file I
> downloaded from the Blackdown site. I downloaded the same file from a
> mirror site and the problem went away.
Hmm. I did download from a mirror... this one: ftp://ftp.tux.org/pub/java/
I think I'l
ED]
cc:(bcc: Tom Williams/HQ/dssi)
Subject: Problems installing Java plugin - sharkive broken?
I can't seem to install the Java plugin on SuSE 6.3.
If I run the Sharkive, ie:
sh JavaPlugIn_1.2.2.px.sh
It shows me the license message in more, but when I leave that, I just get
the follo
I can't seem to install the Java plugin on SuSE 6.3.
If I run the Sharkive, ie:
sh JavaPlugIn_1.2.2.px.sh
It shows me the license message in more, but when I leave that, I just get
the following errors:
: command not found.sh:
: command not found.sh:
: command not found.sh:
': not a valid iden
Hello,
I am having trouble with my java installation.
this is the error I get when I run the installation test.
jjohnson=/lib [234]:java -version
java: error in loading shared libraries:
/usr/local/jdk117_v1a/lib/i686/green_threads/libjava.so: undefined symbol:
_dl_symbol_value
I have libc.so.
On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Ungur Adrian-Alin wrote:
> Dear Sir or Madam,
>
> My name is Ungur Adrian-Alin and I am a musician interested in
> electronic music.
>
> I am writing to you hoping that you could help me. I am not a Java
> programmer but I desperatelly need Java running in order to run some
Dear Sir or Madam,
My name is Ungur Adrian-Alin and I am a musician interested in
electronic music.
I am writing to you hoping that you could help me. I am not a Java
programmer but I desperatelly need Java running in order to run some
music applications such as "HPKComposer", "jMAX" or "Algaoph
P. T. Kornman wrote:
>
> Has anyone out there been able to get Sun's Java Studio 1.0 to run on
> Linux? I went thru the procedure as described on the Blackdown pages and
> I get the error message
>
> Can't find class sun.jws.Main
>
> I do have my own (legally purchased)
Has anyone out there been able to get Sun's Java Studio 1.0 to run on
Linux? I went thru the procedure as described on the Blackdown pages and
I get the error message
Can't find class sun.jws.Main
I do have my own (legally purchased) copy of Java Studio 1.0 (bought
12-97)
Thanks for the tip in the FAQ about removing the libraries when installing
under Slackware.
Because you asked for posts about installating under Slackware, here it is
8^)
I'm on an older distribution - Slackware 3.3 - but I have installed the
GlibC libraries (2.0.6 ??). The Linux kernel is 2.0.2
Yeeehaa! I tried the JDK 1.1.5v7 on Debian 1.1 and javac actually
executed out of the box, with no configuration! Maybe that sounds like no
big deal, but I count that as an enormous victory after fumbling around
with 1.1.5v5 for quite a while. I'll report back after more testing if
there's any w
Steve Byrne wrote:
> JDK 1.1.5 and 1.1.6 libc are built on a Debian 1.3.1 system -- no problems. My
> libc is 5.4.33, and libdl.so is libdl.so.1 => libdl.so.1.8.12.
? Then why won't it work on mine?
[research, research, test, grind, scratch head...]
AHA! A clue!
I started running java with a
On Thu, 28 May 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> Jauvane Cavalcante de Oliveira writes:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > > Whoops - you need the libc5 version, for sure. Debian 2.0 (hamm) is the first
>with
> > > real glibc support.
> >
> > That's not right. I use Debian 1.3.1 and the glib 1.1.5v5 works j
Jauvane Cavalcante de Oliveira writes:
> Hi there,
>
> > Whoops - you need the libc5 version, for sure. Debian 2.0 (hamm) is the first with
> > real glibc support.
>
> That's not right. I use Debian 1.3.1 and the glib 1.1.5v5 works just fine. I'm going
>to
> try 1.1.5v7 as well as 1.1.6
Hi there,
> Whoops - you need the libc5 version, for sure. Debian 2.0 (hamm) is the first with
> real glibc support.
That's not right. I use Debian 1.3.1 and the glib 1.1.5v5 works just fine. I'm going to
try 1.1.5v7 as well as 1.1.6v1 shortly.
Regards,
On Thu, 28 May 1998, Paul Reavis wrote:
> the FAQ (currently at
> http://www.place.org/~stevemw/java/FAQ/FAQ-java-linux.html
> ) for general issues.
That reference is like gold! Thanks gobs for that. I read through part
of it and it explained what all this glibc vs libc5 stuff was. I went
b
Marcus Johnson wrote:
> Now if I'm understanding this correctly (and please set me straight if I'm
> wrong), this is telling me that the system I'm trying to set the JDK 1.1.5
> up on is actually Rex (Debian 1.1) and that the Linux kernal is v. 2.0.0
> (and is that #19 mean its 2.0.019 or that I'
I'm trying to set up the Java JDK 1.1.5 on Debian, and I'm a newbie to
Linux, so I turn to y'all for help. I'm not the administrator, the admin
is not very available and I'm a newbie at Linux/Unix admin stuff, but I
have uncovered this much at least.
* when I start I new shell I get the following
20 matches
Mail list logo
