Is a JDK 1.3.x (with HotSpot compiler) currently in works for the S/390 Linux
environment
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jerry:
1. JAVA_HOME should be /usr/java/jdk1.3.0_02 instead of
/usr/java/jdk1.3.0_02/jre.
2. When you untar jakarta-tomcat, there is a docs document
that tell you how to install tomcat.
3. The jakarta-tomcat-3.2.1/bin contains a startup.sh file
that calls tomcat.sh. There is a line in tomcat.sh
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 01:18:59PM -0700, Jerry Asher wrote:
> 1. What should JAVA_HOME be set to?
JAVA_HOME isn't required for anything - it had an important role
under JDK1.1, but that's no longer the case. The usual convention
is that it points to the top of your SDK or JRE installation - tha
Two days ago, I installed JDK 1.3.0_02. Yesterday I installed Tomcat 3.2.1.
I tried JSPs and they failed. I found a Tomcat FAQ that suggested I needed
to add tools.jar to my CLASSPATH.
So, I added
JAVA_HOME/lib/tools.jar
But that didn't work.
Investigation on my machine shows that
JAVA_HO
> "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> And if you are interested in working on this you may want to
>> consider doing it in a more free (the non-beer kind) way by
>> supporting something like kaffe. Assuming that it isn't
>> possible to make oji start any vm.
OJI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 03:20:44PM +0100, Peter Pilgrim wrote:
> >
> > What glibc version do you need? Does it work with SuSE6.4 Linux for example?
> >
> > --
>
> I was unable to use jdk 1.3 with Suse 6.4
>
>
On -1 xxx -1, Alexander Yap wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have just installed the new JDK 1.3 (from Sun) on my PC running Red Hat
> Linux 6.1. Subsequently, I re-installed the free JBuilder Foundation. However,
> when I attempted to start JBuilder, it threw an exception abou
classpath. I don't quite understand, why this should make a difference, but it does.
Good luck
Uli
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: "Alexander Yap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Juni 2000 05:40
Betreff: JBuilder Foundation
Hi everyone,
I have just installed the new JDK 1.3 (from Sun) on my PC running Red Hat
Linux 6.1. Subsequently, I re-installed the free JBuilder Foundation. However,
when I attempted to start JBuilder, it threw an exception about error loading
some classes before dying.
I got a previous
> And if you are interested in working on this you may want to consider
> doing it in a more free (the non-beer kind) way by supporting something
> like kaffe. Assuming that it isn't possible to make oji start any vm.
>
> Of course, if you have looked at the Sun "community" source you may or may
On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, Daniel Morgan wrote:
> I am most interested in running java applets with JDK 1.3 within the
> Mozilla browser on LInux. If no one has begun work on one, could we get
> a project started for this and use either blackdown.org or mozilla.org
> as the repositor
Is anyone working to get the JDK 1.3 or JDK 1.2 to work with the Mozilla
browser on Linux?
Is blackdown.org working on it?
I am most interested in running java applets with JDK 1.3 within the
Mozilla browser on LInux. If no one has begun work on one, could we get
a project started for this
I have a JCombo that when the popup is displayed it is being treated
as a separate window - i.e. it is given it's own window border and title
bar. This does not happen with IBM 1.3, or Borland 1.2.2.
Also different is the way the window itself is displayed (here I'm
talking the app windo
Hi
You enable it by setting an environment variable:
export JAVA_COMPILER=hotspot
--- http://www.elof.dk --
Kristian Elof Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (+45) 45 93 92 02
On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, Timothy Reaves wrote:
> I do not find doc
Timothy Reaves wrote:
>
> I do not find documentation on how to enable hotspot. Have I
> overlooked it?
Hotspot is enabled by default. You can specify the jit you want on the
command line:
java -hotspot
java -server
java -classic
If you don't specify anything, you get hotspot
I do not find documentation on how to enable hotspot. Have I
overlooked it?
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blackdown Team,
Noticed the webpage has been in
limbo for almost 2 months now on JDK 1.2.2/1.3 status/jck information. Can you
update us with anything? Are you leaving the 1.2.2 port up to Sun now and
concentrating on 1.3? Or are you stepping out totally from the porting
scene?
-Riyad
AFAICT implemention for setRequestProperty is the same in jdk 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3
Don't forget java.net.URLConnection is an abstract class.
Cheers,
Paul
At 11:53 AM -0400 5/9/0, Gayathri Viswanathan wrote:
>Hi !
>
>Is the setRequestProperty method in java.net.URLConnection implemented in
>this vers
Hi !
Is the setRequestProperty method in java.net.URLConnection implemented in
this version ? I checked out the Sun release for Windows and the 1.3 version
doesnt seem to have implemented it yet.
Thanks a lot.
--Gayathri
--
T
fyi,
IBM has posted an early release of JDK 1.3 at Alphaworks.
See http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/linuxjdk
--
David Marshall mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
VM Systems, Inc. http://www.vmguys.com
Windows 2001: "I'm sorry Dave, I can
Hi,
Yes, you're right. Sun has scheduled jdk1.3 for GNU/Linux i386 for
September.
Matthias
Desiree Hilbring wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
> Am I right, that there is no release for the JDK1.3 for Linux yet?
> I did not find anything at blackdown.
>
> Thanks for any answer
>
> Desiree
>
>
Hello everybody,
Am I right, that there is no release for the JDK1.3 for Linux yet?
I did not find anything at blackdown.
Thanks for any answer
Desiree
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I read that announcement as well... but it said "With the help of the
> Blackdown team Sun hopes to... yadda yadda" so from what I understand,
> Blackdown will still be doing the ports.
>
> Can anyone clarify this along with anwering my original question of how
> d
red to 1.2?
-Riyad
Paul Mclachlan wrote:
> At 12:05 11 Nov 1999 -0700, Riyad Kalla wrote:
>
> > This is a question for the developers/porters on the
> > Blackdown team.
> >
> > Q: After looking at the JDK 1.3 code, how portable does it
> > look? Is it much differe
At 12:05 11 Nov 1999 -0700, Riyad Kalla wrote:
> This is a question for the developers/porters on the
> Blackdown team.
>
> Q: After looking at the JDK 1.3 code, how portable does it
> look? Is it much different from 1.2? Or do you think you'll
> have a much eas
This is a question for the developers/porters on the
Blackdown team.
Q: After looking at the JDK 1.3 code, how portable does it
look? Is it much different from 1.2? Or do you think you'll
have a much easier time porting it?
Best wishes,
--
[ Riyad Kalla ]
[ [EMAIL PROT
O
h boy. More bugs to have to work around. I'll be thrilled
when the serialization of primitive types problem is finally
fixed. Yes, I spent too much time working around that
Doug
At 09:16 AM 8/25/99 -0700, Riyad Kalla wrote:
>What is that status on the JDK 1.3 port? Or is this
What is that status on the JDK 1.3 port? Or is this not even
going to be looked at until 1.2.2 is done?
I was just reading through the list of improvements and it
got me all giddy and excited.
For those of you who want to read
it: http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.3/docs/relnotes/features.html
28 matches
Mail list logo
