Hi,
Eugene Rosenzweig wrote:
However the code size would grow dramatically, for every java class there
would be an executable cache which would probably more than double the
effective size of the class takes up on disk.
And there is another reason for not doing this. Here is a snapshot of:
http:
It is certainly an enticing idea. JIT compilation offers even more code
optimisation than conventional pre-compilation so it would be quite
interesting what would happen if someone did write a jvm with jit and an
executable caching scheme. The jvm would jit-compile the code and save the
results to
I do everyday. But it is an older model (730?) and it is painfully slow
- native or not. A P3-500 linux workstation is orders of magnitude
faster.
>>> Charles Forsythe 05/27/03 3:29 PM >>>
P.S. No, I haven't deployed on an AS/400, but I've had a couple of
projects that were intending to at a futu
John R MacMillan wrote:
|>
Are there any JITs that save what they do? [...]
I've been told that IBM's JVM for iSeries (AS/400) does this, but I
don't know that first-hand.
Discussing the AS/400 is off-topic for this list, but if you have an
interest in JIT's or JVM's. you will probably fi
On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 05:34, John R MacMillan wrote:
> |> Are there any JITs that save what they do? [...]
>
> I've been told that IBM's JVM for iSeries (AS/400) does this, but I
> don't know that first-hand.
Yes, I forgot about the AS/400 JVM. It has support for this or some
variation on this n
Hello,
Can anyone recommend a JIT compiler for JDK 1.4.1 on Linux.
The only JIT that I have been able to find that supports 1.4 is the IBM jitc included
With the IBM SDK. Our code doesn't compile with IBMs toolkit though.
Are there any plans on including sunwjit in 1.4.1?
Thanks,
Mat
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 07:31:53AM -0600, Drew Lane wrote:
> From what was said here previously, Apple won't share their
> code with the Blackdown folks, so a JIT is not in the plans.
That's what I've been told too by the Sun folks.
> It's too bad that Sun won&#x
Drew,
I believe the IBM JIT is supposed to work pretty well except they
don't have a java plugin for mozilla. However, has anyone considered
having Blackdown approach IBM to see if they would donate their JIT
code to the Blackdown project?
what was said here previously, Apple won't share their
> code with the Blackdown folks, so a JIT is not in the plans.
>
> This is certainly very dissapointing as Java without a JIT
> can be as slow as mollases (it seems to depend on what you're doing).
>
> You could try the
From what was said here previously, Apple won't share their
code with the Blackdown folks, so a JIT is not in the plans.
This is certainly very dissapointing as Java without a JIT
can be as slow as mollases (it seems to depend on what you're doing).
You could try the Java SDK fro
Hi,
I noticed there is an old JIT compiler for PPC by Metroworks.
Will this work with Blackdown 1.3.1 for PPC?
Will it be any faster than the interpreter?
I think I really need a JIT.
Drew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
on (build
>>Blackdown-1.3.1-02a-FCS)Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build
>>Blackdown-1.3.1_02a-FCS, mixed mode)
>
> I'm running Linux on the PPC (Mac), which only appears to have the
> "classic" VM.:^(
>
> Will Blackdown ever have HotSpot or a JIT for this?
t(TM) Client VM (build Blackdown-1.3.1_02a-FCS, mixed mode)
>
I'm running Linux on the PPC (Mac), which only appears to have the
"classic" VM.:^(
Will Blackdown ever have HotSpot or a JIT for this?
Thanks,
Drew
On Mon, 04 Mar 2002 20:34:44 -0700
"Drew Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From what I understand there is no JIT or Hotspot in Blackdown, correct?
>
>What's the status of this exactly? Can we expect to see one soon?
>
>I haven't had much problem
On Mon, 04 Mar 2002 20:34:44 -0700
"Drew Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From what I understand there is no JIT or Hotspot in Blackdown, correct?
>
>What's the status of this exactly? Can we expect to see one soon?
>
>I haven't had much problem
From what I understand there is no JIT or Hotspot in Blackdown, correct?
What's the status of this exactly? Can we expect to see one soon?
I haven't had much problem with Blackdown, but it is a bit too slow
without a JIT.
I was going to try IBM Java for Linux, but I'm stuck
> I run RedHat Linux 6.1 on an Ultra 5 sparc, bog standard installation
> - GNOME rather than KDE. Yesterday I installed
> jdk-1.2.2-RC4-linux-sparc-glibc-2.1.2.sh and as far as I can see from
> the README's JIT is turned on by default. Yet what I get is:
>
>
the README's JIT is turned on by default. Yet what I get is:
Warning: JIT compiler "sunwjit" not found. Will use interpreter.
I'm obviously doing something stupid but after spending all morning
searching the web for an answer I'm getting nowhere fast. Please
w
We have been looking into using JIT with our application. I've tried JIT
(using j2sdk-1.3.0-FCS-linux-i386 and the classic VM), and our application
seems to run faster with it than with the HotSpot VM.
I'd like to use JIT, but JIT doesn't seem to be in Blackdown's
j2re-
On 28-Jan-2001 Volker wrote:
> does anybody know a JIT for 1.1.8???
TYA works quite well.
Stefaan
--
Ninety-Ninety Rule of Project Schedules:
The first ninety percent of the task takes ninety percent of
the time, and the last ten percent takes the other ninety perc
Hi,
does anybody know a JIT for 1.1.8???
Thanks
Volker
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hallo,
nachdem ich nun sicher bin, dass der Metrowerks JIT nur für PPC
verfügbar ist und daher bei mir nicht lief:
Gibt es einen anderen JIT für Blackdown JAVA 1.1.8???
MfG
Volker
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hallo,
will einmal die Blackdown JAVA 1.1.8 Version testen und habe unter
http://linuxppc.org/software/java/ den Hinweis auf einen JIT von
Metrowerks gefunden und die entsprechenden Binaries runtergeladen und in
die entsprechenden Verzeichniss kopiert!
Der Versuch, den JIT wie nachfolgend
using JMark and caffeine Mark. but then Caffeine doesnt do that rigorous
tests. And JMark doesnt run as it is applet based and has some problems in
running wihtout X.
Thanxs,
Ganesh.
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, SHUDO Kazuyuki wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've measured performance of JIT c
Hi folks,
I've measured performance of JIT compilers which work on Linux.
If you're interested in, please see
http://www.shudo.net/jit/perf/
Evaluated runtime systems are IBM JITC (in IBM JDK 1.3 and 1.1.8),
HotSpot Client and Server VM in Sun JDK 1.3, JIT v3 in Kaffe 1.0.6,
JBuil
Does anyone know if any of the JDKs available support the
tricks that java.lang.Compiler offers? I would like to be able to
selectively disable compiling so I can debug running systems without
having to restart the system to turn off the JIT in order to enable
line numbers. I have
> The download page for the sun 1.3 beta states that 'both client
> and server' jits are bundled.
% java -version
java version "1.3.0beta"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.0beta-b07)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.3.0beta-b04, mixed mode)
% java -hotspot -version
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, noisebrain wrote:
>
> The download page for the sun 1.3 beta states that 'both client
> and server' jits are bundled. I don't see the server -
java -server starts the HotSpot-Server-Version
java -server -version:
java version "1.3.0beta"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environme
The download page for the sun 1.3 beta states that 'both client
and server' jits are bundled. I don't see the server -
am I overlooking it? Perhaps it's intended for the final but
didn't make the beta
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Hi,
I've installed RC4 on my potato box today and noticed that CPU intensive
applets slowed down to a crawl. For example, one of them was eating about
14% of CPU time in RC3 with sunwjit active and now it eats 100%. In fact it
looks like switching JIT _off_ in RC4 gives me more speed!?
A
On 2000-01-21 13:46:30 +0100, Oliver Fels wrote:
> On 21 Jan 00, at 13:09, Martin Schröder wrote:
> > build Linux_JDK_1.2_pre-release-v2 -- No.
> >
> > And if you ask why we use this: It's the only Java2 running with
> > 2.0x kernels.
>
> And the last one actually running on a non glib2.1.2 syst
On 21 Jan 00, at 13:09, Martin Schröder wrote:
> build Linux_JDK_1.2_pre-release-v2 -- No.
>
> And if you ask why we use this: It's the only Java2 running with
> 2.0x kernels.
And the last one actually running on a non glib2.1.2 system.
Oliver
_
On 2000-01-21 11:31:29 +, Peter Pilgrim wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 1.2pre2 doesn't run with -green and JIT; -green works only
>
> Is this Release Candidate 3 ?
build Linux_JDK_1.2_pre-release-v2 -- No.
And if you ask why we use this: It's the only Java2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
> on a Suse 6.3 installation (kernel 2.2.13) with only one cpu the
> 1.2pre2 doesn't run with -green and JIT; -green works only
> without JIT. Native threads work with and without JIT. Any idea
> what's wrong?
Is this Release Can
On 2000-01-20 14:25:32 +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> Hi,
> on a Suse 6.3 installation (kernel 2.2.13) with only one cpu the
> 1.2pre2 doesn't run with -green and JIT; -green works only
> without JIT. Native threads work with and without JIT. Any idea
> what's wrong?
A
Hi,
on a Suse 6.3 installation (kernel 2.2.13) with only one cpu the
1.2pre2 doesn't run with -green and JIT; -green works only
without JIT. Native threads work with and without JIT. Any idea
what's wrong?
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL
Hi!
On Wed, 08 Dec 1999 Gerald Gutierrez wrote:
>With all the recent news regarding Java/Linux (and being hit by the
>idea that there really isn't any useable open source Java engine), I
>became interested in the general topic of JITs, Hotspot-type engines
>(what's it called .. dynamic compilatio
With all the recent news regarding Java/Linux (and being hit by the
idea that there really isn't any useable open source Java engine), I
became interested in the general topic of JITs, Hotspot-type engines
(what's it called .. dynamic compilation?) and bytecode interpretors.
Can anyone recommend
On Mon, Oct 18, 1999 at 03:41:05AM -0600, Robert Simmons wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Is there a functional version of the JIT that works with the 1.2 Jdk on
> linux ? I would love to install it before things get messy in my app. Ive
> build most of the structure and now Im adding con
Borland has released one.
Robert Simmons wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Is there a functional version of the JIT that works with the 1.2 Jdk on
> linux ? I would love to install it before things get messy in my app. Ive
> build most of the structure and now Im adding content like cr
Greetings,
Is there a functional version of the JIT that works with the 1.2 Jdk on
linux ? I would love to install it before things get messy in my app. Ive
build most of the structure and now Im adding content like crazy and I could
easily see this think working on 20 panes in a tab pane all at
I think that the speed depends on what benchmark you run,
though the new borland jit seems generally faster than the
sunwjit that comes with 1.2pre2.
There's a table of timings of several linux jits versus C
at www.idiom.com/~zilla/Computer/javaCbenchmark
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 04:30:33PM -0500, Burkhart,Kelly wrote:
>
>
> What performance does a JIT improve? Are you talking about the time to run
> an uncompiled application with this JIT vs. another JIT (i.e. performance
> improvement is in the JIT compilation not in running
On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, Burkhart,Kelly wrote:
>
>
> What performance does a JIT improve? Are you talking about the time to run
> an uncompiled application with this JIT vs. another JIT (i.e. performance
> improvement is in the JIT compilation not in running the application)? Or
&
What performance does a JIT improve? Are you talking about the time to run
an uncompiled application with this JIT vs. another JIT (i.e. performance
improvement is in the JIT compilation not in running the application)? Or
are you saying that the compiled code from this JIT is faster than the
. but unfortunately doesn't work in linux when all features of my
application are activated. Even disabling the jit or native threads it
does not perform well, but it is getting better ;-)
[]'s
o-oo---ooo----o---oo
Antonio S. R. Gom
On 27-Sep-99 noisebrain wrote:
>
> http://www.borland.com/jbuilder/linux/
It works perfectly. Well, I didn't get a 33% gain in compilation time, only a
15% (maybe because I use the -O flag?), but my game gains a lot of speed and
now is almost as fast (hmmm... less slow :) ) as in windows.
I ran
how do all the JIT's compare? Is it faster than TYA, and is TYA faster than
blackdown's port of sun's jit?
noisebrain wrote:
> If you so choose you can download this jit and run it in place
> of the one that comes with 1.2pre2. The blackdown community
> is familiar with
On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 03:54:21PM -0400, Tim Reilly wrote:
> I took a look at this, and am intrigued. Can anyone comment on
> how stable the combination of this JIT and the 1.2 pre-release might be (I
> realize it'd be unlikely that anyone's tested this combinat
If you so choose you can download this jit and run it in place
of the one that comes with 1.2pre2. The blackdown community
is familiar with two similar replacement jit's - tya and shujit.
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Riyad Kalla wrote:
> Sorry to sound arrogant... but how does this effect
Sorry to sound arrogant... but how does this effect us? Will this go into
the blackdown release from now on?
- Original Message -
From: noisebrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 11:58 AM
Subject: borland/inprise jit for black
I took a look at this, and am intrigued. Can anyone comment on
how stable the combination of this JIT and the 1.2 pre-release might be (I
realize it'd be unlikely that anyone's tested this combination yet, I'm
more concerned with the maturity of the 1.2 JDK)?
I&#x
http://www.borland.com/jbuilder/linux/
"
The JBuilder JIT for Linux preview release is based on the
proven JBuilder JIT for Windows that has been shipping for
over three years and provides significant performance
improvements for Java 2 applications on the
Albrecht Kleine wrote:
> I've just released an update of TYA JIT compiler:
> ftp://gonzalez.cyberus.ca/pub/Linux/java/tya14v2.tgz
I found some bugs of TYA 1.4v2. Fixes will be
appreciated.
1. Handling SIGQUIT.
Send a SIGQUIT signal to JVM by hitting Ctrl+\, then the
JVM run into s
Hi,
as I´ve seen the jdk 1.2 pre v3 is now available for sparc-linux.
I just downloaded it and installed it on my sparc 5 station at my office.
But then I had to find out, that the JIT-Compiler is missing in that JDK.
The file libsunwjit.so exist in that tar-file, but it has a length of 0
I have a (Java) program that does this, although I added the comments
by hand.
Writing a decompiler seemed like a good way to learn jvm. I didn't
originally intend to decompile byte codes, by as usual I got carried away
Nick
Chris Abbey wrote:
> Nick, what program did you use to generate t
VM: kaffeSunSunBlackdownBlackdown
> > JIT: symcjitnone sunwjitnone
> > ---- ---
> > With try/catch388,21212,360545,410136,207466,300
&g
Nick Lawson wrote:
>
> The times for this (Pentium 166, Sun Windows 95 JDK 1.2, Blackdown 1.2pre-v2
> + glibc 2.1 + OpenLinux 2.2,
> 500,000,000 iterations):
>
> VM: kaffeSunSunBlackdownBlackdown
> JIT: symc
kdown 1.2pre-v2
> + glibc 2.1 + OpenLinux 2.2,
> 500,000,000 iterations):
>
> VM: kaffeSunSun BlackdownBlackdown
> JIT: symcjitnone sunwjitnone
> ---- --
gt; >
>
> Times for attached program (JDK1.2pre2, glibc2.1, RH6, 200MHZ PPro,
> 5 iterations):
>
> No JIT sunwjit tya
> -- --- ---
> With try/catch 278793 17925 33894
> Without 237905 15364 35803
>
>
in Java byte-code
> in the Java Virtual Machine Specification, 4.7.3 - The Code
> Attribute.
Times for attached program (JDK1.2pre2, glibc2.1, RH6, 200MHZ PPro,
5 iterations):
No JIT sunwjit tya
-- --- ---
With try/catch 278793 179
> try{
> return intArray[3];
> }
> catch (NullPointerException e)
> {
> return -1
> }
>
> precisely because the JVM does the check for you anyway and the check
> will be done twice (unless you have a JIT), especially if the condition
> doesn't h
JVM does the check for you anyway and the check
will be done twice (unless you have a JIT), especially if the condition
doesn't happen too often (there is still an overhead of generating the
exception -- which is quite large).
I guess times have changed :)
-rchit
Jim Kimball wrote:
>
>
ant with Java (don't confuse this personal
preference with the other personal preference about explicit
checks).
]
Back to the original topic. Lets all agree that best way to write
Java code is (2). Then the VM/JIT (note: NOT you the programmer) has
to do the check anyway (if
Dimitris Vyzovitis wrote:
>
> SHUDO Kazuyuki wrote:
>
> > > Personally I prefer explicit checks.
> >
> > Why?
> >
>
> I am also tempted to ask why
> Is there any particular reason to add client side check for what the VM does on
> its own?
> I personally think that there is no need to do ex
It was my understanding that code wrapped in an exception handler
introduces more overhead to the JVM. I am sure I have seen articles on
this exact topic in Java World or Java Report.
Jim
Dimitris Vyzovitis wrote:
>
> SHUDO Kazuyuki wrote:
>
> > > Personally I prefer explicit checks.
> >
> > W
SHUDO Kazuyuki wrote:
> > Personally I prefer explicit checks.
>
> Why?
>
I am also tempted to ask why
Is there any particular reason to add client side check for what the VM does on
its own?
I personally think that there is no need to do explicit checks in your code
(it is inherently subopt
SEGV on Linux.
Even shuJIT detects NPEs and ArithmeticExceptions
with SIGSEGV and SIGFPE.
> That said, the sunwjit port of Linux does NOT do implicit exceptions.
> There is a lot of code in the JIT that generates machine code that
> explicitly tests for NPEs, StackOverflows, ArithmeticExceptions
e of creation). Exceptions are for exceptional circumstances.
>
> That said, the sunwjit port of Linux does NOT do implicit exceptions.
> There is a lot of code in the JIT that generates machine code that
> explicitly tests for NPEs, StackOverflows, ArithmeticExceptions. So
> if you
the sunwjit port of Linux does NOT do implicit exceptions.
There is a lot of code in the JIT that generates machine code that
explicitly tests for NPEs, StackOverflows, ArithmeticExceptions. So
if you compared the performance of sunwjit or Solaris vs. sunwjit on
Linux, the Solaris one will be sligh
I ran into this tidbit today in some Sun online training material on
JDK1.2:
> The JIT compiler also achieves a minor performance gain by not pre-checking certain
>Java
> boundary conditions such as Null pointer or array out of bounds exceptions. The only
>way
> the JIT compiler
"½ÅÇöÀÏ" wrote:
>
> HI..
> I'm a Korean student..
> I installed JDK1.2 on linux..
> run java classfile
> then I meet "Warning JIT compiler "symcjit" not found. Will use
> interpreter" message.
> but 'root' don't mee
HI..
I'm a Korean student..
I installed JDK1.2 on linux..
run java classfile
then I meet "Warning JIT compiler "symcjit" not found. Will use
interpreter" message.
but 'root' don't meet this message.
normal users meet this message.
any idea
On Thu, 1 Jul 1999 14:36:49 +0200 (MET DST), Mark Christiaens wrote:
>I've got hold of the Sun sources (non-commercial) and am playing around
>with it. I noticed that there are a few libraries included in the src
>directory:
>
>libsunwjit.so
>libsunwjit_g.so
>
&g
I've got hold of the Sun sources (non-commercial) and am playing around
with it. I noticed that there are a few libraries included in the src
directory:
libsunwjit.so
libsunwjit_g.so
These are obviously the JIT compiler libraries. I thought I had received
all of the relevant sources fo
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=zHDeOHGDnzKksZSU; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
> > TYA surely isn't for the bit bucket. It is always nice to have an
> > option. Could you imagine that Sun's JIT has quite a few bugs TYA
>
> Other reasons developing TYA are:
>
> -There are options beside of Linux: TYA is widely used
Oops, have forg
> > > Is TYA headed for the great, big, bit bucket in the sky? :-(
> >
> > I very much doubt it. The JVM can run with multiple JITs, and TYA can
> > run with multiple JVMs.
>
> TYA surely isn't for the bit bucket. It is always nice to have an
> opt
The JIT is one developed by Sun, but it's a lot slower than
the one Sun obtained from Symantec that is included in the windows
version of java. Which in turn is said to be slower than hotspot
for long-running programs.
There was a good set of benchmarks on www.javalobby.org a month
or s
> > Is TYA headed for the great, big, bit bucket in the sky? :-(
>
> I very much doubt it. The JVM can run with multiple JITs, and TYA can
> run with multiple JVMs.
TYA surely isn't for the bit bucket. It is always nice to have an
option. Could you imagine that Sun's
Mike Greaves wrote:
> Excuse me for asking, but am I to understand that Blackdown JDK1.2, as
> of prerelease 2, now includes a JIT and uses it by default? And that
> this JIT is based on Sun source code - i.e. the same one included with
> the Solaris JDK1.2??
Yes, as of prereleas
Stefan Proels wrote:
>
> > cannot find the JIT (sunwjit) and that it is switching to interpreted
> chmod 755 jdk1.2/jre/lib/i386/libsunwjit.so
^^^ -- ?
Excuse me for asking, but am I to understand that Blackdown JDK1.2, as
of prere
> I just downloaded the JDK1.2 pre2, and installed it. Anytime I try and
> invoke the jvm (ie. java ) it comes back and tells me that it
> cannot find the JIT (sunwjit) and that it is switching to interpreted
> mode instead.
> Any ideas on why and how to fix it?
The access perm
I just downloaded the JDK1.2 pre2, and installed it. Anytime I try and
invoke the jvm (ie. java ) it comes back and tells me that it
cannot find the JIT (sunwjit) and that it is switching to interpreted
mode instead.
Any ideas on why and how to fix it?
The platform is :
Dual PII-450
512MB Ram
Check the following page:
http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/ports.html
Wim Ceulemans - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nice Software Solutions - http://www.nice.be
Eglegemweg 3, 2811 Hombeek - Belgium
Tel +32(0)15 412953 - Fax +32(0)15 412954
---
Hi,
I have a few questions on Java 2.
Does the JDK1.2 port for Linux x86 include a JIT? If so which one?
Also is Blackdown working on a JDK port to Linux on sparc? Will that have
a JIT? Also do you have a timeframe on when the JMF, 3D apis will be
available and for which
Hello,
I'm asking a little advice of everyone to find out what a good JIT is
for use with JDK 1.1 on Linux is? Is glibc or libc better or worse?
We're trying to create some graphics images but it takes a long time
to convert to run the code to convert to GIF.
Thanks.
-Gordon
--
Albrecht Kleine wrote:
>
>
> green native
> == ==
> TYA compiled
> EXC_BY_SIGNALS: hangs okay
> NO EXC_BY_S...: okayokay
> ---
> sunwjit : hangs okay
>
> Does a such TYA release really makes sense..?
>
> > At any rate, who could answer questions concerning the linux port of sunwjit?
>
> > PS: Hopefully tya1.3 will be out real soon, so that we don't have to depend on
> > sunwjit...
>
> As mentioned, there is an early TYA1.3 running here but I have some
> heavy problems to get EXCEPTIONS_BY_SI
> BTW does anyone knows the current state of JDK1.2 for FreeBSD ?
> (You know, TYA runs on FreeBSD too.)
It's a ways away. Some progress has been made, but we're waiting for
the Linux patches to be released for some of the integration, and Steve
hasn't (yet) done that.
Nate
-
faster
than sunwjit. (Hope you are not disappointed to much.)
Any JIT will call a lot of functions residing inside the JVM. May be
some of them are not yet optimized in the first alpha release of 1.2/linux?
As mentioned, there is an early TYA1.3 running here but I have some
heavy problems t
Dimitris Vyzovitis wrote:
// ...
// lots_of_stuff
// ...
After some recompilations (still using jikes0.47),and the problem is no longer
there.
It is *mysterious* to me, as I can not reproduce the (possible) bug.
I guess I have to retract that "... it looks like a jit bug to me..." (or
Hi,
I have some unexpected problems using some reflection stuff under
jdk1.2-pre1.
In particular, if I have the jit enabled, I get an arcane verify error
thrown. If I turn off the jit, it works normally.
Also note that jdk1.1.7 (with tya) runs the same classes (that - not-
were compiled using
le "hot spot" thing looks like vapor ware. Besides
> > even if Sun is able to get "something" out the door they have already
> > stated that it will be given to "paying customers only". Instead of
>
> Easy answer on this: Let´s wait and see.
>
> &
Hi,
I'm a newbie in java-land. Can anyone please tell me what is the
best JIT for linux.
I used kaffe, it's very good except that it core dumps on a large
applet (with 600 textfields) where this same applet runs
perfectly in blackdown's JVM and even nets
gt; waiting and hoping that Sun will do us a favor why not help out with
> the free JIT projects like TYA? I have already found a bug in TYA
As I said, if there is a JIT for Linux which overruns all benchmarks
and which comes close to what HostSpot is promised to do, I will
be glad to use it.
e better it is.
> It is only half as good as promised there is no need for porting 1.1
> JITs to 1.2.
>
> BTW I will revise the above statement if someone can write a free
> JIT with similar features and performance, but I doubt it.
>
> Oliver
Sorry but that whole "ho
to 1.2.
BTW I will revise the above statement if someone can write a free
JIT with similar features and performance, but I doubt it.
Oliver
___
Oliver Fels| e-mail:
Neurotec Hochtechnologie GmbH | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T
etween 1.1 and 1.2.
The interface is certainly changed. COMPILER_VERSION as
version number of the interface is changed from 5 of JDK
1.1 to 6 of JDK 1.2.
But the internal structure of JVM will not be changed
drastically. I suppose adaptation of JITs to JDK 1.2
isn't too hard.
But, JDK 1.2 for Linu
Hi,
> Both TYA and the ShuJIT are free JIT's which work with Linux and JDK 1.1 ...
> I am assuming that porting them to work with JDK 1.2 will not be (too)
> difficult.
I know nothing, but I've heard that the interface for JITs has changed a
lot between 1.1 and 1.2.
--
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
