Re: Why won't java 1.2 load an external swing package

1999-08-31 Thread Ted Neward
--- From: Daniel Barclay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, August 27, 1999 11:24 AM Subject: Re: Why won't java 1.2 load an external swing package > >> From: Ondrej Popp <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Why won't java 1.2 load an external swing package

1999-08-29 Thread Daniel Barclay
> From: Ondrej Popp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I tried adding .jar files before rt.jar in the CLASSPATH > in the hope that the java runtime would use those instead of the > integrated ones. However this does not seem to work at all. Does anyone > know why? JDK 1.2 uses multiple class paths. See "

Why won't java 1.2 load an external swing package

1999-08-22 Thread Ondrej Popp
Hi, I upgraded to jdk-1.2 but I want use swing-1.1.1beta2 because this one seems to be ahead of the integrated swing of jdk 1.2 and contains many bugfixes. I tried adding .jar files before rt.jar in the CLASSPATH in the hope that the java runtime would use those instead of the integrated ones.

Re: Problems with Java 1.2 pre-v1 on Linux

1999-07-25 Thread Nagaraj S.B
Nacho Mayorga wrote: > > Madrid, July 23rd 1999 > > Hi, > > I've got Java 1.2 pre-v1 installed on RedHat 6.0. While trying to > compile (javac) one version of the world-infamous HelloWorld applet > (just for trying purposes) the following error

Problems with Java 1.2 pre-v1 on Linux

1999-07-23 Thread Nacho Mayorga
Madrid, July 23rd 1999 Hi, I've got Java 1.2 pre-v1 installed on RedHat 6.0. While trying to compile (javac) one version of the world-infamous HelloWorld applet (just for trying purposes) the following error occurred: *** panic: GC: getStickySystemClass failed: java/lan

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
"Hopple, Michael R (CRD)" wrote: > > Rachel - > > I also am running an SMP kernel with a RedHat 5.2 installation. I have found the >same observations > that you did regarding native and green threads. Unfortunately, green thread with >no JIT is really a > pain. Well, as it's all I had under

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Michael Sinz wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:52:20 +0100, Rachel Greenham wrote: > > >Cees de Groot wrote: > >> > >> Just to add a data point: I've experienced the same. Also using SuSE 6.1 > >> (SMP 2.2.10 kernel, I don't know which libc but I think not glibc2.1) on > >> a dual PII box. Green

RE: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Blackdown jitterbug site. I think it was #591. Mike -Original Message- From: Rachel Greenham [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 1999 2:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Java 1.2

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
On Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:52:20 +0100, Rachel Greenham wrote: >Cees de Groot wrote: >> >> Just to add a data point: I've experienced the same. Also using SuSE 6.1 >> (SMP 2.2.10 kernel, I don't know which libc but I think not glibc2.1) on >> a dual PII box. Green threads don't work at all, native t

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Cees de Groot wrote: > > Just to add a data point: I've experienced the same. Also using SuSE 6.1 > (SMP 2.2.10 kernel, I don't know which libc but I think not glibc2.1) on > a dual PII box. Green threads don't work at all, native threads seem > to be less stable than the same on a single process

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
ich is a mobile Pentium/MMX in my case, with the exact same SuSE installation). Rachel wrote: >Java 1.2 green threads won't start on one system: It just hangs taking >all processor time and memory. This is a Dual PII machine with SMP >running kernel 2.2.9 and I've reported this a

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Jim Jensen wrote: > > Check to make sure the permissions of jre/lib/i386/libsunwjit.so are > 0775 - it appears that some of the glibc2.0 jdk1.2pre2 did not have > this set properly (see mail attached below). I wasn't on the list at that time, but earlier today I figured that out myself, and it's

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Check to make sure the permissions of jre/lib/i386/libsunwjit.so are 0775 - it appears that some of the glibc2.0 jdk1.2pre2 did not have this set properly (see mail attached below). -Jim - Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 15:44:45 -0700 From: Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Nathan Meyers wrote: > > Rachel Greenham wrote: > > I get, when I run Java: > > > > Warning: JIT compiler "sunwjit" not found. Will use interpreter. > > > > Yes, also on the SMP box. > > > > $ java -version > > Warning: JIT compiler "sunwjit" not found. Will use interpreter. > > java version "1.2

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Rachel Greenham wrote: > I get, when I run Java: > > Warning: JIT compiler "sunwjit" not found. Will use interpreter. > > Yes, also on the SMP box. > > $ java -version > Warning: JIT compiler "sunwjit" not found. Will use interpreter. > java version "1.2" > Classic VM (build Linux_JDK_1.2_pre-r

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Nathan Meyers wrote: > > Rachel Greenham wrote: > > > > I recently (this weekend) attempted an upgrade to Java 2 on our web > > servers, and came across a few problems someone might be able to help > > with. Briefly: > > > > Java 1.2 green threads won&#

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Rachel Greenham wrote: > > I recently (this weekend) attempted an upgrade to Java 2 on our web > servers, and came across a few problems someone might be able to help > with. Briefly: > > Java 1.2 green threads won't start on one system: It just hangs taking > all

Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
I recently (this weekend) attempted an upgrade to Java 2 on our web servers, and came across a few problems someone might be able to help with. Briefly: Java 1.2 green threads won't start on one system: It just hangs taking all processor time and memory. This is a Dual PII machine wit

java 1.2 certification

1999-05-31 Thread OZER IRFAN
Hello, I search information about Java 1.2 certification exam. Have you exam simulation applet ? Or documentation ? Please send me. Thanks. Irfan Get free e-mail and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1

Re: Java 1.2 installation problems (Can't find libjava.so)

1999-05-25 Thread Christophe Warland
> We're using Linux Slackware 3.9 with kernel 2.0.37 and are trying to install JDK >1.2. We decompress it, execute "java" and get this error: > > "Error: Can't find libjava.so." > I had that problem a while a go when my user profiles were brand new (or rather inexistent). In particu

Re: Java 1.2 installation problems (Can't find libjava.so)

1999-05-25 Thread Steve Nguyen
From: Tomás Diago (tdiago) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Tuesday, May 25, 1999 7:30 PMSubject: Java 1.2 installation problems (Can't find libjava.so) We're using Linux Slackware 3.9 with kernel 2.0.37 and are trying to install

Java 1.2 installation problems (Can't find libjava.so)

1999-05-25 Thread Tomás Diago (tdiago)
We're using Linux Slackware 3.9 with kernel 2.0.37 and are trying to install JDK 1.2. We decompress it, execute "java" and get this error:   "Error: Can't find libjava.so."   But this file exists, and even copying it the dir /lib still fails...   Does anybody know how to solve this problem ?

Re: Weird Java 1.2 bug?

1999-05-24 Thread Nathan Meyers
Brandon Anderson wrote: > > I'm having a problem with java 1.2 on a Redhat 5.2 system. > > It seems that whenever I run any java application that 5 instances of that > program get loaded into memory. The same is true when I attempt to run > the rmiregistry. Is this norm

Weird Java 1.2 bug?

1999-05-24 Thread Brandon Anderson
I'm having a problem with java 1.2 on a Redhat 5.2 system. It seems that whenever I run any java application that 5 instances of that program get loaded into memory. The same is true when I attempt to run the rmiregistry. Is this normal? The same code that I'm running worked pe

Tried using pre-release Java 1.2

1999-04-27 Thread Dana L. Dickinson
Hi! You wanted to hear from me if I tried installing the pre-release Java 1.2. Didn't get too far with it; I was guessing the Linux and libraries might not be recent enough. The symptom was a seg fault when I tried to compile using javac (I tried "javac -g -deprecation SarGui.java"

Jikes and Java 1.2

1999-03-14 Thread Nelson Minar
David Shields, one of the Jikes authors, asked me to forward the following: --- Jikes now supports the Java language changes added in 1.2. We'll soon be adding support for the three new classpath-related arguments ( -source

Java 1.2 w/2.0.X

1999-03-01 Thread Tom McMichael
Hello, Am I to assume that jdk 1.2 will not be released for 2.0.X kernels and only for the 2.2.X. ... assumed from the status page of jdk 1.2 Tom McMichael [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Re: java 1.2

1999-01-29 Thread Nathan Meyers
thegamer wrote: > > when I get JAVA2??? > how long make ?? Sun has distributions available for Solaris and Win32. The Linux version is not ready, and asking for it every day will not make it ready any faster. Nathan

java 1.2

1999-01-29 Thread thegamer
when I get JAVA2??? how long make ??

Re: suggestion for list (was: Re: STOP asking about Java 1.2 / 2

1999-01-11 Thread Nagendra Mishr
Can I suggest using ENewsWorks.. a JAVA based list management system running on linux. It's got all the features of all the other MLM's and we've tested it with millions of users. A list this size should be well under 300,000 users? Nagendra [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ENewsWorks URL: www.email

RE: suggestion for list (was: Re: STOP asking about Java 1.2 / 2

1999-01-11 Thread Kontorotsui
On 10-Jan-99 Chris Abbey wrote: > I suggest that the current copy of the FAQ be included with the succesful > subscription message. I know this is possible with majordomo because other > lists do it. I believe this will reduce the volume of these questions because > it appears that most of the pe

Re: suggestion for list (was: Re: STOP asking about Java 1.2 / 2)

1999-01-10 Thread John Summerfield
On Sat, 9 Jan 1999, Chris Abbey wrote: > The recent on-list exchange between John Summerfield and Kontorotsui has > brought a background thought of mine to the foreground, so I'd like to share > it with the list and see what the general opinion is. > > I suggest that the current copy of the FAQ

suggestion for list (was: Re: STOP asking about Java 1.2 / 2)

1999-01-09 Thread Chris Abbey
The recent on-list exchange between John Summerfield and Kontorotsui has brought a background thought of mine to the foreground, so I'd like to share it with the list and see what the general opinion is. I suggest that the current copy of the FAQ be included with the succesful subscription messag

Re: STOP asking about Java 1.2 / 2

1999-01-09 Thread John Summerfield
On Sat, 9 Jan 1999, Kontorotsui wrote: > > But *please* STOP ASKING about Java 1.2/2. Don't be silly. Nothing you say will stop new subscribers asking the question most on their minds. > > First of all it's a FAQ, Blackdown have already answered: in a month. > Yes,

STOP asking about Java 1.2 / 2

1999-01-09 Thread Kontorotsui
I know we're all holding our breath while waiting for it, I know we're all so enthusiastic about it. I know that we read everywhere about Java 2 and we don't want to use winbug to try it. I'm waiting for it like all of you. But *please* STOP ASKING about Java 1.2/2. Fir

Re: Will SWING be included in the Linux version of Java 1.2?

1998-12-29 Thread Nigel Gamble
On Tue, 29 Dec 1998, Kontorotsui wrote: > As I say in the subject, can you confirm that SWING will be part of the JDK 1.2 > for Linux? Yes. Swing is a standard part of Java 2 (formerly known as JDK1.2). Nigel Gamble[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mountain View, CA, USA.

Will SWING be included in the Linux version of Java 1.2?

1998-12-28 Thread Kontorotsui
As I say in the subject, can you confirm that SWING will be part of the JDK 1.2 for Linux? --- Andrea "Kontorotsui" Controzzi - MALE Student of Computer Science at University of Pisa - Italy - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] My home page: http://www.cli.di.unipi.it/~controzz/intro.html Founder an

Re: Java 1.2 (Java 2) functionality

1998-12-20 Thread Nathan Meyers
John Summerfield wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Dec 1998, Nathan Meyers wrote: > > There's also some publicity at Sun's Java site > > (http://java.sun.com/pr/1998/11/pr981102-01.html) describing Sun's > > support for a Linux JDK 1.2. Of course, there's no clue what that > > "support" entails -- writing fa

Re: Java 1.2 (Java 2) functionality

1998-12-20 Thread John Summerfield
On Sun, 20 Dec 1998, Nathan Meyers wrote: > Mark Murphy wrote: > > > > Will there be a port for Linux having the swing components and other > > Java 1.2 functionality ? You can download swing NOW from Sun for JDK1.1. > > There's also some publicity at Sun&#x

Re: Java 1.2 (Java 2) functionality

1998-12-20 Thread Nathan Meyers
Mark Murphy wrote: > > Will there be a port for Linux having the swing components and other > Java 1.2 functionality ? You'll find it explained at http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/ports.html#jdk1.2 . The note, which is undated :-(), tentatively promises Linux JDK 1.2 "i

Java 1.2 (Java 2) functionality

1998-12-20 Thread Mark Murphy
Will there be a port for Linux having the swing components and other Java 1.2 functionality ?

Re: Java 1.2

1998-12-14 Thread Jeremiah Jahn
I don't know if I missed something, but it looks like the FAQ has been updated. -jj- -- -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: 2.3 mQCNAi0lY4sAAAEEAPR4vyny2WCxVe4gW7u+zPT2fH6vFTwMxAoBOrrUn92aGKJr ronHVYMbSO9CwBK3F1KKi+IGB/SxkjH7x2j/b7HiwHjKb+mkDa+lA6eOh9x8A7dJ 55be0mOMF+W9FLDdIgK/RDLFo

Re: Java 1.2

1998-12-14 Thread Mike Zauzig
I asked this question a month ago and did not get a single response. So I'm assuming one of two possibilities: either Sun has virtually taken over the porting of Java2 to Linux and the Blackdown developers are being hush hush about it for some unknown reason, OR, everybody's just too busy and not

Re: Java 1.2

1998-12-12 Thread James Seigel
;>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 12/12/98, 4:53:33 PM, Ron Resnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re: Java 1.2: > Michael Privat wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I realise you probably

Re: Java 1.2

1998-12-12 Thread Ron Resnick
Michael Privat wrote: > > Hi, > I realise you probably get this question ten thousand times a day, > but is there a Java v1.2 porting project ? Is there any approximation > about when it would be available ? > > Thanks a lot, > Michael Privat > >

Java 1.2

1998-12-11 Thread Michael Privat
Hi, I realise you probably get this question ten thousand times a day, but is there a Java v1.2 porting project ? Is there any approximation about when it would be available ? Thanks a lot, Michael Privat --- Michael Privat Massachusetts In

Re: Important: Java 1.2 licencing changes

1998-12-08 Thread Robert McConnell
Did you check your browser's cache to see if there were copies there? I did see something about this while I was looking at InfoWorld Online this afternoon. Aparently the announcement was made at some conference this afternoon and the new package will be released next week. Cheers, Bob McConnell

Re: Important: Java 1.2 licencing changes

1998-12-08 Thread peter . pilgrim
Mrfr! I though a web hacker had crack www.javasoft.com at first!!! Question is though was Steve in on it? Pete __ Reply Separator _ Subject: Important: Java 1.2 licencing changes Author: thomas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) at lon-mime

Re: Important: Java 1.2 licencing changes

1998-12-08 Thread Uncle George
pages are up. Wow! (Also related story > on javalobby.org) > > Greetings, > > // Jaco > > > -Original Message- > > From: Thomas Down [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 1998 3:14 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > &g

RE: Important: Java 1.2 licencing changes

1998-12-08 Thread Jaco Greeff
Visited the pages just now... the new pages are up. Wow! (Also related story on javalobby.org) Greetings, // Jaco > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Down [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 1998 3:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

Re: Important: Java 1.2 licencing changes

1998-12-08 Thread tov are jacobsen
Java 2 is back. --- Vennlig hilsen Tov Are Jacobsen System utvikler http://zoom.no - Norges kjøpeguide On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, Thomas Down wrote: > Just before 1pm GMT today, I visited http://www.javasoft.com/. The site > had been completely redesigned to announce that the JDK 1.2 technology had

Important: Java 1.2 licencing changes

1998-12-08 Thread Thomas Down
Just before 1pm GMT today, I visited http://www.javasoft.com/. The site had been completely redesigned to announce that the JDK 1.2 technology had been re-named Java 2, and it was to be distributed under a new (more open) licence agreement. Then a few minutes later it all disappeared and the old

Java 1.2 on Netwinder Linux?

1998-11-30 Thread Mike Zauzig
Anybody know who's working on porting Java 1.2 to the Netwinder? What would JavaSoft's involvement be? Thanx.

Re: Java 1.2 and Java3D for Linux...?

1998-08-31 Thread Toni Nikkanen
On Mon, 31 Aug 1998, Bernhard Fastenrath wrote: > > > I was wondering when/if Java 1.2 will be ready for Linux, and if there are > > > any plans for porting the Java3D library to linux, too (it needs OpenGL on > > > Sun and Win32 platforms... and would probably nee

Re: Java 1.2 and Java3D for Linux...?

1998-08-31 Thread Bernhard Fastenrath
> > I was wondering when/if Java 1.2 will be ready for Linux, and if there are > > any plans for porting the Java3D library to linux, too (it needs OpenGL on > > Sun and Win32 platforms... and would probably need that on Linux to function > > properly). Just curious.

Re: Java 1.2 and Java3D for Linux...?

1998-08-31 Thread Dustin Lang
> Although a little unrelated it may be interesting to you: SUN is selling Solaris > 2.6 for both Sparc and x86 architectures at $ 10.00 + shipping. Now, does this make sense to anyone else: from sun's web site I can order solaris, for $10. My choices for shipping are: USPS Global Priority Mail

Re: Java 1.2 and Java3D for Linux...?

1998-08-31 Thread Jauvane Cavalcante de Oliveira
Hi Harold, > I was wondering when/if Java 1.2 will be ready for Linux, and if there are > any plans for porting the Java3D library to linux, too (it needs OpenGL on > Sun and Win32 platforms... and would probably need that on Linux to function > properly). Just curious. Thanks.

Java 1.2 and Java3D for Linux...?

1998-08-31 Thread Harold G. Andrews II
I'm new to the mailing list so please forgive me if this subject has already been beaten to death, but... I was wondering when/if Java 1.2 will be ready for Linux, and if there are any plans for porting the Java3D library to linux, too (it needs OpenGL on Sun and Win32 platforms... and

Re: java 1.2 ??

1998-06-09 Thread Ron Yorston
cedric baudoin wrote: >is there any known date for java 1.2 ? Don't know about Linux, but the latest information on the Java Developer Connection is that JDK 1.2 beta 4 is due out 29 June and the final release will be 21 September. That'll be for Windows and S

Re: java 1.2 ??

1998-06-09 Thread Azazel
According to the FAQ (http://www.place.org/~stevemw/java/FAQ/FAQ-java-linux.html): > 2.5 When is the JDK 1.2 Going to be Released for Linux? > > According to Steve Byrne on Monday, May 26th 1998: > > JavaSoft is trying very hard to get a license set up with an external person > to co

java 1.2 ??

1998-06-09 Thread c . baudoin . alcatel
A: INTERNET--IBMMAIL De:cedric BAUDOIN ALCATEL ESPACE - DSPS/DESR - service simulation systeme tel:33.(0)5.61.19.68.17 email:c.baudoin.alcatel(a)e-mail.com Objet: java 1.2 ?? hello is there any known date for java 1.2 ? best regards, cedric baudoin c.baudoin.alcatel(a)e-mail.com