Marek Pawinski wrote:
Hi
I am trying to install a app which uses java during the installation
process.
I get this error : ./setup.bin
"Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
com/zerog/lax/LAX"
Java looks for the com.zerog.lax.LAX class, so
it must be within reach for the runt
Hi
I am trying to install a app which uses java during the installation
process.
I get this error : ./setup.bin
"Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
com/zerog/lax/LAX"
The offending line seems to be :
"lax.nl.java.launcher.main.class=com.zerog.lax.LAX" in my setup.bin.lax
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> When I start a java application on my Mandrake box, and I monitor it
> using top, I notice that several java instances show up. Why is this?
> It eats up a ton of my memory, and I don't see the reason for it, as
> java is multithreaded. How can I
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:31:57AM -0400, kevin1 wrote:
> When I start a java application on my Mandrake box, and I monitor it
> using top, I notice that several java instances show up. Why is this?
> It eats up a ton of my memory, and I don't see the reason for it, as
> java is multithreaded. H
When I start a java application on my Mandrake box, and I monitor it
using top, I notice that several java instances show up. Why is this?
It eats up a ton of my memory, and I don't see the reason for it, as
java is multithreaded. How can I change this behaviour?
-
Hi:
I'm
trying to use two java threads t1 and t2, and each one uses exec() to start the
same C native application. It seems JVM (BlackDown 1.1.8 v1) never
switches from t1 to t2. The output looks like:
In
thread t1: i = 0
In
thread t1: i = 1
In
thread t1: i = 2
...
I put
s
> > Hello.
> >
> > I'm using RedHat 6.0 and IBM's jdk1.1.8
> >
> > (1) Can someone tell me the linux command line to give a java app
> > keyboard focus, without having to give its window a mouseclick? (I want
> > to create an app that does not
Robert Passaro wrote:
Hello.
I'm using RedHat 6.0 and IBM's jdk1.1.8
(1) Can someone tell me the linux command line to give a java app
keyboard focus, without having to give its window a mouseclick? (I
want
to create an app that does not use a pointer of any kind)
(2) Can someone tel
rly if the
component is in a Window, rather than a Frame.
Robert Passaro wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm using RedHat 6.0 and IBM's jdk1.1.8
>
> (1) Can someone tell me the linux command line to give a java app
> keyboard focus, without having to give its window a mouseclick? (I
Hello.
I'm using RedHat 6.0 and IBM's jdk1.1.8
(1) Can someone tell me the linux command line to give a java app
keyboard focus, without having to give its window a mouseclick? (I want
to create an app that does not use a pointer of any kind)
(2) Can someone tell me how I can launch
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 03:30:45PM +0700, Siriphen Wikaisuksakul wrote:
>
> When I compile java application, it take very long time to succeed and if I don't
>type -J-mx option, it can't compile the application. Here is the error message:
>
> The compiler has run out of memory. Consider using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Siriphen Wikaisuksakul wrote:
> >%_
> When I compile java application, it take very long time to succeed and if I don't
>type -J-mx option, it can't compile the application. Here is the error message:
>
> The compiler has run ou
Use Jikes, from IBM.
http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/jikes/?aw=50
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 03:30:45PM +0700, Siriphen Wikaisuksakul wrote:
>
> When I compile java application, it take very long time to succeed and if I don't
>type -J-mx option, it can't compile the appl
When I compile java application, it take very long
time to succeed and if I don't type -J-mx option, it can't compile the
application. Here is the error message:
The compiler has run out of memory. Consider
using the "-J-mx" command line option to increase the maximum heap
size.
Could
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 15, 1999 12:37 PM
Subject: Can we run Java app from a CD with Blackdown?
> Hi:
>
> We got a few questions on deployment with Blackdown. It would be
> appreciated if so
On Fri, Oct 15, 1999 at 01:37:10PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi:
>
> We got a few questions on deployment with Blackdown. It would be
> appreciated if someone could help.
>
> Q1: After we finish a Java application development on Windows NT 4.0 (Intel)
> with VisualCafe 3.0, is it possib
Hi:
We got a few questions on deployment with Blackdown. It would be
appreciated if someone could help.
Q1: After we finish a Java application development on Windows NT 4.0 (Intel)
with VisualCafe 3.0, is it possible to include everything** on a CD, and let
user run the Java application from th
Nathan Meyers wrote:
> Here's a possible (but problematic) CGI script:
Thanks very much for the detailed help.
> The problems?
> 1) Very expensive to start all this stuff up every time you need to do
> CGI.
> 2) Only one server can run at a time for a given display address (:0,
> :1, etc.); you
is sold -
> > the RPM is XFree86-Xvfb, if you're an RPM user.
>
> That sounds good. But how would I make my Java app run in this
> environment? Should I call Runtime.exec("Xvfb") from within Java or
> should it be called by the Perl CGI script before the Ja
x27;re an RPM user.
That sounds good. But how would I make my Java app run in this
environment? Should I call Runtime.exec("Xvfb") from within Java or
should it be called by the Perl CGI script before the Java app is
called?
Robbie
-
Robbie Baldock wrote:
>
> Can someone remind me how to run a command-line Java 1.2 app which
> requires graphics libraries (to build a GIF file) without having to have
> an X window open? I want to call it from a Perl CGI script.
>
> I came across a bit of Linux software a while back which supp
Can someone remind me how to run a command-line Java 1.2 app which
requires graphics libraries (to build a GIF file) without having to have
an X window open? I want to call it from a Perl CGI script.
I came across a bit of Linux software a while back which supposedly
emulated an X session but of
> Yes, to DB2 from EJB. DB2 runs beautifully on Linux. I am running the
beta
> version but it is still great. Give it plenty of memory though.
> But we will soon try out Oracle 8. We are fairly confident as Oracle's
JDBC
> type 4 driver is very good. I have used it elsewhere. Hopefully should
not
t for 3-tier Java apps
and would like to use Linux but don't know if it's feasible
I would prefer cases of 100% Java app servers but those built in
C/C++ that serve EJB and/or Java Servlets will also do.
I will be doing this for a development environment for production
applications and
My case
RedHat 6.0
JDK 1.1.7 v2
BEA WebLogic 4.02
Also, using Apache and Jserv.
Works great.
> -Original Message-
> From: Nitin Borwankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, 23 May 1999 12:30
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Java app server on linux ?
>
L PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, May 23, 1999 12:29 PM
Subject: Java app server on linux ?
>
>Is anyone using (development or production)
>a Java application server such as BEA Weblogic or even
>an all Java HTTP server such as Javasoft's Java WebServer ?
>
>Is this feasible at
uch as Javasoft's Java WebServer ?
>
> Is this feasible at all ?
>
> What version JDK do you use on what Linux distro and version ?
>
> I am setting up a development environment for 3-tier Java apps
> and would like to use Linux but don't know if it's feasible
evelopment environment for 3-tier Java apps
> > and would like to use Linux but don't know if it's feasible
> > I would prefer cases of 100% Java app servers but those built in
> > C/C++ that serve EJB and/or Java Servlets will also do.
> >
> > I will be doing th
--Original Message-
> > From: Nitin Borwankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, 23 May 1999 12:30
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Java app server on linux ?
> >
> >
> >
> > Is anyone using (development or production)
> > a Java a
-
Nitin> > > From: Nitin Borwankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Nitin> > > Sent: Sunday, 23 May 1999 12:30
Nitin> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nitin> > > Subject: Java app server on linux ?
Nitin> > >
Nitin> > >
Nitin> > >
Nitin> > > Is
The only plausible reason I can think of is performance. Anybody measured
encryption speed when using RSA's libs?
Nitin Borwankar writes:
> ACtually the Java WebServer is 100% Java.
> the SSL libraries are C and currently are only available on NT and
> Solaris.
> But you can run the server o
All the changes you have discussed have been made to the site and to the
ftp site. The only change that remains to be made is to add the same link
to the FAQ. That'll be something SteveW needs to do as soon as he gets
a chance.
Thanks for the helpful comments.
Cheers,
Karl
Dan Kegel writes:
Steve Byrne wrote:
>
> Dan Kegel writes:
> > > Look again in README.linux.
> >
> > The doc could be made a little more accessible. Did you know there's
> > no link to README.linux on http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux.html ?
> > It ought to be right there next to the FAQ.
> > It should al
Dan Kegel writes:
> Steve Byrne wrote:
> > John Summerfield writes:
> > > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
> > > Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
> > I guess README.linux *could* be named more obviously :-
Robert Ritchy writes:
> Listen - as yet another newbie - don't screw things up for me. This list
> has been EXTREMELY helpful to me and my work. The promptness and quality of
> reponse from this list is unmatched. These "gurus" have taken a lot time to
> give us a quality product and suppor
e 1998 19:15
Asunto: Java app without X installed
>Hi
>
>I'm testing a little application that has to run on a linux server without X
>installed. When I run it on my linux box without X running, it runs fine.
>But when I run in on a linux box without X installed I get the followin
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
>
> > John Summerfield writes:
> > > On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
> > >
> > > Well I for
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> John Summerfield writes:
> > On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
> >
> > Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
>
>
can't we all just get along
-rob
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Dug Birdzell wrote:
> all right, poor choice of words.., and really besides the point anyway.
>
> recent post said it best: "no attitude necessary". if you don't
> feel like answering a question, then don't answer it. what's the point
At 01:14 PM 10/7/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Let me just put in my two cents as another newbie. It's a pain in the
>a** to have to RTFM all the time. Has anyone counted up all the
>thousands of pages of documents there are out there? Speaking as
>someone who has been R'ing TFM instead of asking, I ha
all right, poor choice of words.., and really besides the point anyway.
recent post said it best: "no attitude necessary". if you don't
feel like answering a question, then don't answer it. what's the point of
getting down on other programmers for asking a question?
Yours,
Dug Birdzell
If you would take the time to observe this list for a while then you would realize
that just about every question is answered almost immediately. I know I asked a
lot of redundant and simple questions and always got an answer. Please, wait for
more than one email as your reference before attacki
5 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Java app without X installed
>
> John Summerfield writes:
> > On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Aw, come on, man!
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> John Summerfield writes:
> > On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
> >
> > Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
>
>
o
the group, and only one of them is laziness.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Ritchy [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 1998 1:31 PM
> To: Kanoza_D
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Robert Ritchy wrote:
> Listen - as yet another newbie - don't screw things up for me. This list
> has been EXTREMELY helpful to me and my work. The promptness and quality of
> reponse from this list is unmatched. These "gurus" have taken a lot time to
> give us a quality
Bear in mind that privatization of knowledge of technologies which compete
with the Dark Side only serve to empower it.
Yours,
Dug Birdzell Software Engineer HuskyLabs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.butterfly.net/~dug www.lab.com
> "Kevin" == Kevin Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kevin> With that kind of attitude...heck...you could work for
Kevin> Microsoft.
Back off! Without his work you'd be using Microsoft!
--
Stephen
---
Perl is really designed more for the guys that will hack Perl at least
20 minut
;m hoping someone out there will be a little
> understanding and give me a helping hand. I'm not asking you to come to
> my house and do it for me, after all.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Steve Byrne [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October
With that kind of attitude...heck...you could work for Microsoft.
> > Exercise patience and courtesy in your replies. You too were a beginner
> > once.
>
> Yes. And I didn't ask for help before exhausting the other options, if I asked
> for help at all.
>
Steve Byrne wrote:
> John Summerfield writes:
> > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
> > Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
> I guess README.linux *could* be named more obviously :-)
>...
> > I can see no mention
John Summerfield writes:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
>
> >
> > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
>
> Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
I guess README.linux *could* be named more obviously :-)
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998 21:05:39 +0800 (WST), John Summerfield wrote:
>On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
>
>>
>> Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
>
>Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
>I've just installed the jre o
On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
>
> Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
I've just installed the jre on a system without X. To make the jre even run
I found it necessary to in
hreads/java: can't resolve
> symbol '_XLockMutex_fn'
>
> The jdk I'm using is 1.1.6v4a.
> The linux box with X installed is a Redhat 4.2, the linux box without X
> installed is a Redhat 5
>
> So my question: is it possible to run a java based app w
is 1.1.6v4a.
The linux box with X installed is a Redhat 4.2, the linux box without X
installed is a Redhat 5
So my question: is it possible to run a java based app without X installed?
Does anybode have an idea how to run a java app without X installed?
Wim Ceulemans
Nice bvba
Hi,
Let me pause for a moment and smack myself for being such a goof.
*SMACK*
I think I was just incorrectly interpreting the results of my initial
tests on the compile() method; it works exactly as one might expect: takes
args such as "-d", "-O", and the list of files to compile.
Sorry for th
Dustin Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Let me pause for a moment and smack myself for sending this admittedly
> off-topic message. (Flame at will)
>
> *SMACK*
>
> Okay, now, has anyone ever used sun.tools.javac to do compiling within a
> running vm? I'm writing a versioning server
Hi,
Let me pause for a moment and smack myself for sending this admittedly
off-topic message. (Flame at will)
*SMACK*
Okay, now, has anyone ever used sun.tools.javac to do compiling within a
running vm? I'm writing a versioning server that can compile java files
and right now I'm using the m
59 matches
Mail list logo
