[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:23:16PM +0200, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a look at the sources and I was able to build them on my x86
machine.
The port seems to be possible. I even think that the blackdown java team
has already done it.
Yes an
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:23:16PM +0200, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I had a look at the sources and I was able to build them on my x86
> >machine.
> >
> >The port seems to be possible. I even think that the blackdown java team
> >has already done it.
>
> Yes and it's m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to run the only 1.4 jdk released for the linux sparc arch.
Unfortunately, the only version available for sparc is the 1.4.1 which
began to broke around the availability of the glibc 2.3.6.
Now, some bug have been filed against this but noone ever responded to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On March 13, 2004 15:02, Jean-Sebastien Bettez wrote:
> Hello,
> is there a porting plan for jdk 1.4 and/or jdk 1.5 on linux/arm?
>
> seeya!
It look like there's no one working on this project.
We would like to do the jdk1.5 arm port.
Do we have to
On Wed, 23 May 2001, ed phillips wrote:
> Is Calvin or anyone else giving any talks on their work to get
> the latest JDK and Hotspot going on Linux?
>
> Calvin sent some intriguing hints about the work he had to do
> to get Hotspot performing well on Linux, but I'd like more info
> or even docu
those are the native_threads you asked for...
the pthread impl on Linux has each thread take an space in the process
table, which is what ps et al are reading. take a look at the archives for
the list back around end of last year, begining of this one for the gory
details.
cabbey at home dot n
Hi Patrick,
this is the correct behaviour with native threads under linux. The
thread implementation of linux treats processes and threds basically the
same way, they just have different sets of shared vs. non-shared
ressources. One result of this is that any thread shows up in the
process table.
> If I am just am just doing basic Swing/Java apps on Linux.
> And want a farily stable solution, would my best bet to be
> JDK 1.1.8 (when it comes out in a bit from Blackdown) and
> Swing 1.1.1 from Sun? Or is there THAT much difference
> between that solution and JDK 1.2prev2?
Well, Sun isn't
Riyad Kalla wrote:
> If I am just am just doing basic Swing/Java apps on Linux.
> And want a farily stable solution, would my best bet to be
> JDK 1.1.8 (when it comes out in a bit from Blackdown) and
> Swing 1.1.1 from Sun? Or is there THAT much difference
> between that solution and JDK 1.2prev
Riyad Kalla wrote:
>
> If I am just am just doing basic Swing/Java apps on Linux.
> And want a farily stable solution, would my best bet to be
> JDK 1.1.8 (when it comes out in a bit from Blackdown) and
> Swing 1.1.1 from Sun? Or is there THAT much difference
> between that solution and JDK 1.2pr
On Thu, 10 Sep 1998 14:44:50 -0700, Masuda, Bond wrote:
>Hello Michael,
>
>Thank you for replying so quickly..
>
>The particular address in my message was a bogus address.. I was
>assuming that would be clear when I mentioned the whatever.home.edu. In
>anycase, yes, my DNS is setup properly, as '
or any furthur help if you can.
Bond Masuda
Global Integrity Corp. (an SAIC company)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Michael Sinz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 1998 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Masuda, Bond
Subject: Re: Java on Linux... bug in InetAdd
On Thu, 10 Sep 1998 13:34:08 -0700, Masuda, Bond wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I am having trouble getting reverse DNS lookups to work on Linux.
>Following is a snip of the code... this works on Windows 95, Windows NT,
>but not on Linux. The problem is that the getHostName method returns the
>ipString instea
13 matches
Mail list logo
