Rachel Greenham wrote:
>
> Nathan Meyers wrote:
> >
> > "Nolte, Holger" wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > what is sunwjit ? Is it a jit compiler like TYA for linux ? Can anybody tell
> > > me where to get it ?
> >
> > Yes. It's bundled with JDK1.2/JRE1.2.
>
> However, it continues to not be detected
Rachel Greenham wrote:
>
> Nathan Meyers wrote:
> >
> > "Nolte, Holger" wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > what is sunwjit ? Is it a jit compiler like TYA for linux ? Can anybody tell
> > > me where to get it ?
> >
> > Yes. It's bundled with JDK1.2/JRE1.2.
>
> However, it continues to not be detected
Nathan Meyers wrote:
>
> "Nolte, Holger" wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > what is sunwjit ? Is it a jit compiler like TYA for linux ? Can anybody tell
> > me where to get it ?
>
> Yes. It's bundled with JDK1.2/JRE1.2.
However, it continues to not be detected during startup.
--
Rachel
"Nolte, Holger" wrote:
>
> Hi,
> what is sunwjit ? Is it a jit compiler like TYA for linux ? Can anybody tell
> me where to get it ?
Yes. It's bundled with JDK1.2/JRE1.2.
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> If you need real Java speed you should quickly switch to Windows or
> buy a RS 6000 computer + software ;)
I'm physically allergic to Windows and don't have the dough for the second
option, so I think I'll just make do with my dual 400Mhz Pentium box :-).
(which will
> Looks like the SUNWjit beats TYA by a large margin (and, without putting
> down the tremendous effort that TYA represents, I more-or-less expected
If you need real Java speed you should quickly switch to Windows
or buy a RS 6000 computer + software ;)
Cheers
Albrecht
Steve Byrne wrote:
> Scott Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Bob Cadenza wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> > > For images this is almost 5 times as slow in jdk1.2. You can even see
> > > it, the benchmark even redraws itself noticably slow.
> >
> > You can chalk that differe
Scott Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Bob Cadenza wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > For images this is almost 5 times as slow in jdk1.2. You can even see
> > it, the benchmark even redraws itself noticably slow.
>
> You can chalk that difference up to the addition of Java2D in
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Bob Cadenza wrote:
[snip]
> For images this is almost 5 times as slow in jdk1.2. You can even see
> it, the benchmark even redraws itself noticably slow.
You can chalk that difference up to the addition of Java2D in JDK 1.2.
Check out the number 1 bug in Bug Parade, #4185726
Well I took your lead and downloaded CaffeineMark3 so I could see if I
could reproduce your results. First off it is a shame that your image
results returned 0. Ok First off I ran the tests three times on the
same computer but with different jdk's, once with jdk1.2(win32),
jdk1.2v2(linux), and j
>> JDK1.2v3
> ^^
>Is this a typo? If not, where can I get the new version? Upon a cursory
>look, I didn't see it at the mirrors.
>
It's a typo.
--
Cees de Groot http://www.cdegroot.com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Ummm,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 1999 3:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: sunwjit slows down JDK
>
>
> I don't understand what everybody's perception is here, b
>As the experience of many in this group shows, TYA is in no imminent
>danger of being put out of business by Sun's JIT efforts.
>
I don't understand what everybody's perception is here, but I've grabbed
an old benchmark (CaffeineMark3) and the results are obvious:
JDK1.1.7:
TYA 1.2v4: 811,
>This posting reminded me of my many struggles trying to find a neatly
>compiled list of java properties. Does anyone know if such a list
>exists for JDK properties?
There's an excellent list in the Java Developer's Almanac, an
all-around nifty reference:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0
.
kornel.
- Original Message -
From: Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bob Cadenza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 07, 1999 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: sunwjit slows down JDK
>Bob Cadenza wrote:
>>
>> I have been getting very
Paul Ignacio Pacheco Piemonti wrote:
>
> with sunwjit: It takes about 28 seconds to load.
> without a JIT: It takes about 19 seconds to load.
> with tya: it takes about 13 seconds to load.
And I was just noting how much of a boost the sunwjit seems to give. I
ha
Bob Cadenza wrote:
>
> I have been getting very slow performance also, but didn't know what
> might be causing it. Exactly how do you disable the JIT, and what is
> TYA? I realize I am a newbie, but please enlighten me.
You use a command-line option to choose your JIT (or lack of JIT). For
no
I have been getting very slow performance also, but didn't know what
might be causing it. Exactly how do you disable the JIT, and what is
TYA? I realize I am a newbie, but please enlighten me.
Bri
--- Paul Ignacio Pacheco Piemonti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using the following sys
18 matches
Mail list logo
