Re: Some initial impressions (was: emacs vs xemacs)

1999-01-05 Thread Richard Jones
John Summerfield wrote: > > There was talk of them releasing their JVM for > > Linux ... I'm really looking forward to that. > > I don't know about JVM: I saw a mention of the x86 JIT here. Isn't that the same thing? Or can you plug one JIT into any JVM? Rich. -- - Richard Jones. Linux c

Re: Some initial impressions (was: emacs vs xemacs)

1999-01-05 Thread John Summerfield
On Mon, 4 Jan 1999, Richard Jones wrote: > Michael Thome wrote: > > Now, if only those IBM Alphaworks guys would release the VM-side > > code and/or spec for their profiler (Jinsight) project so us Linux > > users could benefit, too... > > There was talk of them releasing their JVM for > Linux .

Re: Some initial impressions (was: emacs vs xemacs)

1999-01-04 Thread Richard Jones
Michael Thome wrote: > Now, if only those IBM Alphaworks guys would release the VM-side > code and/or spec for their profiler (Jinsight) project so us Linux > users could benefit, too... There was talk of them releasing their JVM for Linux ... I'm really looking forward to that. Rich. -- -

Re: Some initial impressions (was: emacs vs xemacs)

1999-01-04 Thread Michael Thome
> "Nathan" == Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Michael Doherty wrote: >> >> Works great! Thanks Rich. I'm frankly kinda amazed. Jikes seems about >> an order of magnitude faster than the jdk117_v1a compiler. Not sure how >> that's possible but goota hand it to the guy(s) at IBM wh

Re: Some initial impressions (was: emacs vs xemacs)

1999-01-01 Thread Chris Kakris
Michael Doherty wrote: > > browsing the web and getting mail. Still haven't gotten Makefile to > work, but I get some ideas for that when I get back to work Monday. > (Any sample Makefiles for java would be appreciated - TIA) Hi Michael I've included four sample files that I tend to use over and

Re: Some initial impressions (was: emacs vs xemacs)

1999-01-01 Thread Nathan Meyers
Michael Doherty wrote: > > Works great! Thanks Rich. I'm frankly kinda amazed. Jikes seems about > an order of magnitude faster than the jdk117_v1a compiler. Not sure how > that's possible but goota hand it to the guy(s) at IBM who wrote it. Native code (Jikes) vs Java (Sun compiler) implementa

Re: Some initial impressions (was: emacs vs xemacs)

1999-01-01 Thread Michael Doherty
Works great! Thanks Rich. I'm frankly kinda amazed. Jikes seems about an order of magnitude faster than the jdk117_v1a compiler. Not sure how that's possible but goota hand it to the guy(s) at IBM who wrote it. Regards, Michael Richard Jones wrote: > > Michael Doherty wrote: > > > > Greetings

Re: Some initial impressions (was: emacs vs xemacs)

1999-01-01 Thread Michael Doherty
Richard Jones wrote: > > Michael Doherty wrote: > > Anyway, the thing with linux is that it seems to run java code faster > > than NT. NetBeans on the NT side (200MHz K6 w/128MB ram) is almost > [...] > > I'm surprised. NetBeans crawls with the Blackdown > Linux JDK. Are you using TYA perhaps?

Re: Some initial impressions (was: emacs vs xemacs)

1999-01-01 Thread Richard Jones
Michael Doherty wrote: > > Greetings all, [...] > (Any sample Makefiles for java would be appreciated - TIA) > > Anyway, the thing with linux is that it seems to run java code faster > than NT. NetBeans on the NT side (200MHz K6 w/128MB ram) is almost [...] I'm surprised. NetBeans crawls with t

Some initial impressions (was: emacs vs xemacs)

1999-01-01 Thread Michael Doherty
Greetings all, Well, it's been about 3 weeks since I've installed linux with a dual boot setup on my NT box in order to do java development. Thanks to all who offered advice and encouragement. I've tried all the popular java ide's on NT, Visual Age, Visual Cafe, JBuilder, etc., but I must say,