--- Message History
From: Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/01/2002 12:29 PST
To: jordan muscott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: java-blackdown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sun bug 4498974
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 05:21
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:28:18AM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have no idea if the Blackdown folks are addressing this problem
> > for their JDK1.4 release
>
> We would -- but so far nobody came up with a real solution.
>
> (Although I'm
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 07:40:47PM -0800, Man Chi Ly wrote:
> Sun lost the client-side battle years ago, perhaps primarily due to the
> fact that Swing was not performance-competitive w/ native Windows apps...
>
> The reality is that as small a market Java client apps currently are,
> the marke
Nathan Meyers wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 05:21:33PM +, jordan muscott wrote:
>
>>I've just noticed bug 4498974 on the Sun website. Im totally shocked about
>>this. It was my understanding (please correct me if i am wrong), that the
>>promised increase in performance with Swing was
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 10:21:46PM +, jordan muscott wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 January 2002 20:29, Nathan Meyers wrote:
> >VolatileImage is a client-side technology, and Sun is trying to regain
> >the client-side foothold it lost by "winning" its lawsuit against
> >Microsoft.
>
> Thanks for r
On Tuesday 01 January 2002 20:29, Nathan Meyers wrote:
>VolatileImage is a client-side technology, and Sun is trying to regain
>the client-side foothold it lost by "winning" its lawsuit against
>Microsoft. In the battle for the desktop, winning Windows developers
>with faster graphics is way m
On Tuesday 01 January 2002 20:29, Nathan Meyers wrote:
>VolatileImage is a client-side technology, and Sun is trying to regain
>the client-side foothold it lost by "winning" its lawsuit against
>Microsoft. In the battle for the desktop, winning Windows developers
>with faster graphics is way m
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 05:21:33PM +, jordan muscott wrote:
> I've just noticed bug 4498974 on the Sun website. Im totally shocked about
> this. It was my understanding (please correct me if i am wrong), that the
> promised increase in performance with Swing was based around the use of
> Vo
I've just noticed bug 4498974 on the Sun website. Im totally shocked about
this. It was my understanding (please correct me if i am wrong), that the
promised increase in performance with Swing was based around the use of
VolatileImage. Personally, i am interested in using Java for game
develop
