Jim Hazen writes:
> Same there. Blackdown is doing a great job with 1.2 considering all the
> bazillion new features it adds over 1.1. The latest rounds of Native
> threads for 117v3 work great
'cept for AWT in dlopen() loaded JNI apps. Still waiting for
the new release with improved AWT lin
t's
> being done by the Blackdown folks.
>
> Also, I'm wondering how long it might be until a native-threads
> version of the JDK (either 1.1.x or 1.2) is working with glibc 2.1.
> Is the problem in linuxthreads, or the JDK? Where can I read more
> about it, and possibly lend a h
Hi all-
I should start by saying "Thanks!" for all the great work that's
being done by the Blackdown folks.
Also, I'm wondering how long it might be until a native-threads
version of the JDK (either 1.1.x or 1.2) is working with glibc 2.1.
Is the problem in linuxthreads, or t
thanks, I have 117_v3 but I'm wondering when 1.2 will be available.
-- dog writes:
>codea wrt:
>> does any one have and indication as to when a version of the jdk 1.2
>> will be available that is compatible with glibc 2.1? Couldn't find
>> the answer in the a
codea wrt:
> does any one have and indication as to when a version of the jdk 1.2
> will be available that is compatible with glibc 2.1? Couldn't find
> the answer in the archive or FAQs.
jdk117_v2 or jdk117_v3.
dog
---
Hi all,
does any one have and indication as to when a version of the jdk 1.2
will be available that is compatible with glibc 2.1? Couldn't find
the answer in the archive or FAQs.
thanks, conrad
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Is this a no-no in terms of JVM running with native threads support under
glibc 2.1.1-6 on a Dual PII with 512MB RAM system running RedHat Linux 6.0
(as specified in your Bug Report)?
(I can run simple stand-alone programs, but not the Apache-JServ Servlet
engine)
OR
There exists a patch or a wo
Thanks to the list for the explanation why glibc 2.1 breaks the older
JDKs. The newly posted 117_v2 for glibc 2.1 works and I can now test out
the Enhydra server app.
Steve
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Tue, 4 May 1999, Steve Byrne wrote:
> Scott Murray writes:
[snip]
> > It seems to fix the problem I (and others I think) had with Runtime.exec
> > hanging sometimes when used with native threads. Which is good, as I
> > was almost resigned to putting in some Linux specific code into the ap
Scott Murray writes:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 1999, Tom McMichael wrote:
>
> [snip!]
>
> > Good point Paul ... checked out jitter bug and according to the "DONE"
> > section the two choices for glibc 2.1 are:
> > 1) jdk 1.2
> > 2) pre-pre-release
rom sbb. Looking at the mail archives, there was no indication that
anyone was actually looking into the glibc 2.1.x situation so I decided to
go for it. Now that it's actually been done, I can go back working on
other projects. :)
- cls
Sandro Hawke wrote:
> > An _unofficial_ version 1.1.6v5 compiled against glibc 2.1.1 pre1 is
> > available at http://www.seawood.org/java/ . Try to be gentle. If one
> > could mirror it or bless it and put it with the official releases to be
> > mirrored, my provider would be grateful. :)
>
> W
> An _unofficial_ version 1.1.6v5 compiled against glibc 2.1.1 pre1 is
> available at http://www.seawood.org/java/ . Try to be gentle. If one
> could mirror it or bless it and put it with the official releases to be
> mirrored, my provider would be grateful. :)
Well, I can mirror it at least:
An _unofficial_ version 1.1.6v5 compiled against glibc 2.1.1 pre1 is
available at http://www.seawood.org/java/ . Try to be gentle. If someone
could mirror it or bless it and put it with the official releases to be
mirrored, my provider would be grateful. :)
Details. It was built on a Red Hat
> Scott Murray writes:
Scott> I don't want to sound ungrateful for the 1.2 effort (the
Scott> initial results of which I'm using with great success), but
Scott> is there an ETA for the release of jdk117_v2?
No, we want to make a JDK 1.1.8 release but we still haven't got the
sour
On Tue, 27 Apr 1999, Tom McMichael wrote:
[snip!]
> Good point Paul ... checked out jitter bug and according to the "DONE"
> section the two choices for glibc 2.1 are:
> 1) jdk 1.2
> 2) pre-pre-release of jdk117_v2 available at ...
>
> http://www.wisp.net/~kreil
1
> Read JitterBug for detail.
> It's more that a month old already, it seem nobody read JitterBug.
>
> Paul
Good point Paul ... checked out jitter bug and according to the "DONE"
section the two choices for glibc 2.1 are:
1) jdk 1.2
2) pre-pre-release of jdk117_v2 available
At 06:09 PM -0500 04/26/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Is there still a planned glibc 2.1 release of pre-v1?
JDK1.2 pre-v1 works with glibc2.1
You have to use green threads and nojit.
README.linux have more info.
(BTW, from the README.linux pre-v1 was bulit on glibc 2
At 05:20 PM -0700 04/26/99, Pete Wyckoff wrote:
>For 1.1 you may want to back up to 116v5, or you can try 1.2pre-v1,
>but I've personally had no success with 1.1.7 and glibc2.1 either.
There is a solution for jdk117 on glibc 2.0 and 2.1
Read JitterBug for detail.
It's more that a month old alrea
Pete Wyckoff wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Well I think the common problem with glibc 2.1 (2.1.1)
> > is the error on excuting the java binary :
> >
> > ./../bin/i586/green_threads/java: error in loading shared libraries:
> > ./../lib/i586/
> > gre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Has using glibc 2.1 with 1.2pre-v1 been confirmed as working ?
> (Don't want to download it if I don't have to ... )
Linux 2.2.6, jdk1.2pre-v1, glibc-2.1 (and 2.1.1pre1). Runs awt and
swing stuff. Noticeably slower than 117. Green_threads only. O
> For 1.1 you may want to back up to 116v5, or you can try 1.2pre-v1,
> but I've personally had no success with 1.1.7 and glibc2.1 either.
Has using glibc 2.1 with 1.2pre-v1 been confirmed as working ?
(Don't want to download it if I don't have to ... )
Tom McMic
Uncle George wrote:
> U just cant wait to bleed. Looks like 6.0 wont be released until may 10
>
RedHat 6.0 on FTP servers is available starting today actually
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Well I think the common problem with glibc 2.1 (2.1.1)
> is the error on excuting the java binary :
>
> ./../bin/i586/green_threads/java: error in loading shared libraries:
> ./../lib/i586/
> green_threads/libjava.so: undefined symbol: _dl_symbol_va
Pete Wyckoff wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > [..] It seems most messages about glibc 2.1
> > have gone unanswered ...
>
> Try posting a particular question, i.e. what's your error message? It
> works for me, but maybe we do different stuff.
>
>
ave said it was too bleeding edge ...
> but with the release of RedHat 6.0 - I would hope a jdk for glibc 2.1
> would be compiled soon.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there still a planned glibc 2.1 release of pre-v1?
>
> I hope this question hasn't been answered somewhere obvious, if it has, I
> apologize.
>
> Thanks for porting the jdk to linux, you've done an awesome job!
>
> -Mi
Hi,
Is there still a planned glibc 2.1 release of pre-v1?
I hope this question hasn't been answered somewhere obvious, if it has, I
apologize.
Thanks for porting the jdk to linux, you've done an awesome job!
-Mike
---
I have been a happy user of jdk 1.1.7 until I tried out redhat 5.9
(trying out
5.9 because of new hardware I just bought). My question: is a glib 2.1
version
of 1.1.7 going to be compiled ? I know most people are yelling for jdk
1.2
but I would think recompiling 1.1.7 wouldn't be too much of a
On 11 Apr 1999, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > The response to the bugreport (id 430) was that a JDK-1.2 with support
> > for the glibc-2.1 would be uploaded within a few days. It was over a
> > month ago.
> > The solution was obviously not a trivial one. Could you please
>>>>> Johan writes:
Johan> On 11 Apr 1999, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> I'm running (thanks to the tips in this list!) jdk 1.2pre1 with glibc
>> 2.1. I'm using small wrapper scripts to set the required options,
>> e.g.:
>> $ cat
>>>>> Johan Sundström writes:
> Hi
> this is not a bugreport :). Still I'm having broblem to run the JDK-1.2
> pre-v1
> on a glibc-2.1 system. I found that someone has reported the same
> problem as
> I have and the mailinglist contains several po
Hi
this is not a bugreport :). Still I'm having broblem to run the JDK-1.2
pre-v1
on a glibc-2.1 system. I found that someone has reported the same
problem as
I have and the mailinglist contains several posts regarding glibc-2.1
and JDK-1.2.
The response to the bugreport (id 430) was that
> I'm also curious about the status of the JDK on glibc 2.1 systems. How
> hard will it be to make the JDK run with glibc 2.1? Is it easy to keep
> a glibc 2.0 around so JDK will run? Does anyone know what glibc Redhat
> 6.0 is planning to ship? (Anyone seen 5.9?) I think it&#
I'm also curious about the status of the JDK on glibc 2.1 systems. How
hard will it be to make the JDK run with glibc 2.1? Is it easy to keep
a glibc 2.0 around so JDK will run? Does anyone know what glibc Redhat
6.0 is planning to ship? (Anyone seen 5.9?) I think it's important
that so
Would it be possible for any of the blackdown developers to create a
binary distribution for glibc-2.1? Alternatively, I would be glad to
work with Linux diffs. A while back I made a move to glibc-2.1 and now I
am stuck without a working jdk since 1.1.7 does not work either and I do
not the 1.1.7
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 1999 11:07 AM
> To: Smith, Brendan
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Knut-Håvard Aksnes'
> Subject: Re: jdk1.2pre-v1 problems on glibc-2.1
>
> You need to read the release notes. jdk1.2v1 is compiled with static
> Motif,
> so it isn&
> Brendan F. Smith
> The MITRE Corp.
> (732) 389-5684 - Office
> (732) 544-8863 - Fax
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.mitre.org
>
> > --
> > From: Knut-Håvard Aksnes[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, Mar
; Subject: jdk1.2pre-v1 problems on glibc-2.1
>
> I am running a Rawhide installation with glibc2.1 and the 2.2.3
> kernel.
>
> The following problems seems to force me to work on NT or wait for the
> glibc2.1 version of jdk1.2. (Now eagerly awaiting the glib
I am running a Rawhide installation with glibc2.1 and the 2.2.3
kernel.
The following problems seems to force me to work on NT or wait for the
glibc2.1 version of jdk1.2. (Now eagerly awaiting the glibc2.1 version)
java -green -Djava.compiler= NO.orion.markfeed.MarkFeedAdmin
Exception in threa
hi,
i tried using jdk 1.1.7 w/ glibc 2.1.999***
(222) i think, it didnt work, calling upon redundant things must be (forget) -
the point being i reinstalled glibc 2.0 and it worked fine. I had to put baq
glibc 2.1 as i use it w/ other programs.
i thought maybe jdk 1.2 might work.. i get
http://www.blackdown.org/cgi-bin/jdk/pending?id=423;expression=glibc2.1;user=guest
mentions recomplied version of both of the above.
Has this been release yet? Unforutantely it's not mentioned on the
homepage or the mailing archives.
Nicholas
--
"I reserve the right to contradict my
At 9:30 AM +0100 3/8/99, German Jose Gomez Garcia wrote:
> Well, although many people has reported strange problems with
>glibc-2.1, it is working ok here (I would say that it is working faster,
>but I have no benchmarks) and it supports things like Unix98 pty and more.
>
Well, although many people has reported strange problems with
glibc-2.1, it is working ok here (I would say that it is working faster,
but I have no benchmarks) and it supports things like Unix98 pty and more.
The only problem (ignoring some weird apps like StarOffice 5.0) is
that
Dear list,
Is there a version of the jdk that runs with glibc 2.1? If so where can I
find it?
Thanks,
Ken
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
45 matches
Mail list logo
