Hi,
Just in case anyone was wondering, I installed the release kernel 2.2.0
and java (Blackdown JDK1.1.6, green threads, libc5) works flawlessly.
Thanks for the great work,
dstn.
-
Dustin Lang, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi steve,
http://java.blackdown.org/~sbb for JDK 1.1.6 Linux Port Status webpage
not navigabl. Please tell me the new URL.
Thanks,
Yonghe Xue
hello, I had tried to use JNI whithin a shared library, but I can't start
the virtual machine. All works right within a stand-alone application, but
we I invoke the jvm from the shared library.
Can anubody help me? or point me to what I doing wrong.
Sorry for my poor english, and thanks in advan
Hello Linux JDK Porters,
1.1.6v5 works great for us but here is a small bug report.
(I use this channel because Jitterbug gave me
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /cgi-bin/jdk on this server.
)
1. Startup is slowed down by factor of 2.5 (!) by checkVersions.
The following wor
On Fri, Oct 30, Sven Werner wrote:
> I'm using Linux Kernel 2.0.35, libc5.4.46.
>
> When I'm using the above mentioned JDK it crashes like this:
>
> SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
>
> Full thread dump:
> Monitor Cache Dump:
> Registered Monitor Dump:
> Monitor IO lock:
> Child
Sven Werner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm using Linux Kernel 2.0.35, libc5.4.46.
>
> When I'm using the above mentioned JDK it crashes like this:
>
> SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
>
> Full thread dump:
> Monitor Cache Dump:
> Registered Monitor Dump:
> Monitor IO lock:
> Child death monit
I was wondering if there is a misunderstanding as to where the download
JDK 1.1.6 for linux is.
I went to the UK mirror sites (as instructed in the FAQ) and found only
the gziped tar files of the differences from the original version, but
not the whole JDK.
Would you please help?
Thank you
Wolfgang Walter wrote:
>
> Hi !
>
> When using jdk 1.1.6-v5 for running the citrix client I get a strange behaviour:
> after the dialog 'connecting to ', when the main window has appeared
> nothing is displayed in it till I move the window (but the client does
unsubscribe
Wolfgang Walter wrote:
> Hi !
>
> When using jdk 1.1.6-v5 for running the citrix client I get a strange behaviour:
> after the dialog 'connecting to ', when the main window has appeared
> nothing is displayed in it till I move the window (but the client
On Fri, Oct 09, 1998 at 06:32:12PM +, Adam Williams wrote:
> >
> > When using jdk 1.1.6-v5 for running the citrix client I get a strange
> behaviour:
> > after the dialog 'connecting to ', when the main window has appeared
> > nothing is displayed
>
> When using jdk 1.1.6-v5 for running the citrix client I get a strange
behaviour:
> after the dialog 'connecting to ', when the main window has appeared
> nothing is displayed in it till I move the window (but the client does not
> hang, it just does not display an
Hi !
When using jdk 1.1.6-v5 for running the citrix client I get a strange behaviour:
after the dialog 'connecting to ', when the main window has appeared
nothing is displayed in it till I move the window (but the client does not
hang, it just does not display anything). After
This may seem crazy but how do you install or deal with .rpm files ?
hi,
I'm just upload to incoming.redhat.com (and I hope i'll be in contirb
area tomorrow):
The Blackdown Java-Linux Porting Team's port of Sun(tm)'s Java(tm) Development
Kit.
jdk-1.1.6-5.glibc.i386.rpm
jdk-1.1.6-5.glibc.src.rpm
Transvirtual's free Java VM:
kaffe-1.0.b2-3
On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, James Michael Keller wrote:
> libqt 1.40
>
> I'll update and see if that helps at all
The problem is well know and fixed in the most recent versions of kwm.
Regards,
-- martin
// Martin Konold, Herrenbergerstr. 14, 72070 Tuebingen, Germany //
// Email: [EMAIL PROTE
libqt 1.40
I'll update and see if that helps at all
David Guthrie wrote:
>
> Just a guess, but what version of libqt do you have ( doubt this matters).
> I have 1.41 (1.40 worked too.)
> if you need ICQ, there exists a KICQ that seems to work pretty well, but I assume
> you need java
Just changed to the 1.1.6.4a-1glibc release of the blackdown.org jdk
port. and have noticed a bug with respect to KDE
In particular this was the ICQ Java preview program. The main window
will appear, and run fine. However when you double click to get the
dialog box to send a message, or read
Uncle George wrote:
> it really hasn't been about the versions of the 21x64x processors, but rather
> of HTML space on my ISP. ( now its also about bandwidth @ 250 mb/month xfer ) .
> It just takes me about 36 min to do a complete compile ( .c & .java ), less if
> i just redo the .o's.
> such is
Michael Sinz writes:
> On Fri, 02 Oct 1998 18:16:59 +0400, Alexander Davydenko wrote:
>
> >> > > * You DO NOT need to set JAVA_HOME. Doing so can be bad for your health
> >>
> >> What makes you think HotJava needs JAVA_HOME? Look at the launching script. I
> >> think you need to set JDK
Michael Sinz wrote:
> If that is the only Java VM on your system, then it should not cause
> a problem. However, setting this can lead to problems if you install
> a new JDK to try it and forget to unset it.
:) i have 3 versions installed. Just use link to what i want.
> With so many different
On Fri, 02 Oct 1998 18:16:59 +0400, Alexander Davydenko wrote:
>> > > * You DO NOT need to set JAVA_HOME. Doing so can be bad for your health
>>
>> What makes you think HotJava needs JAVA_HOME? Look at the launching script. I
>> think you need to set JDK_HOME (or JRE_HOME) but not JAVA_HOME,
> > > * You DO NOT need to set JAVA_HOME. Doing so can be bad for your health
>
> What makes you think HotJava needs JAVA_HOME? Look at the launching script. I
> think you need to set JDK_HOME (or JRE_HOME) but not JAVA_HOME, but the script
> is the final arbiter.
I can't catch a thought... W
John Gulizia writes:
> David Buddrige wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have recently downloaded JDK 1.1.6 from
> > ftp.progsoc.uts.edu.au/pub/Linux/java to run on my Redhat 5.1 system...
> > I've un-tar'ed it into /usr/local/jdk1.1.6, a
David Buddrige wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have recently downloaded JDK 1.1.6 from
> ftp.progsoc.uts.edu.au/pub/Linux/java to run on my Redhat 5.1 system...
> I've un-tar'ed it into /usr/local/jdk1.1.6, and then added the following
> lines to my /etc/profile file.
>>>>> David Buddrige writes:
David> Hi all,
David> I have recently downloaded JDK 1.1.6 from
David> ftp.progsoc.uts.edu.au/pub/Linux/java to run on my Redhat
David> 5.1 system... I've un-tar'ed it into /usr/local/jdk1.1.6,
David> and t
Alexandre Boissy writes:
>
>
> Steve Byrne wrote:
>
> > David Buddrige writes:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have recently downloaded JDK 1.1.6 from
> > > ftp.progsoc.uts.edu.au/pub/Linux/java to run on my Redhat 5.1 system...
Alexandre Boissy wrote:
> Steve Byrne wrote:
>
> > David Buddrige writes:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have recently downloaded JDK 1.1.6 from
> > > ftp.progsoc.uts.edu.au/pub/Linux/java to run on my Redhat 5.1 system...
> > > I
> I have recently downloaded JDK 1.1.6 from
> > ftp.progsoc.uts.edu.au/pub/Linux/java to run on my Redhat 5.1 system...
> > I've un-tar'ed it into /usr/local/jdk1.1.6, and then added the following
> > lines to my /etc/profile file
> >
> > PATH=&qu
At 11:03 AM 01-10-98 +0200, Alexandre Boissy wrote:
>
>
> I have the same problem than David, but I have also Hotjava on my
system. And
>Hotjava needs JAVA_HOME ! What can I do ?
>
>Thanks, Alex.
I use the following script to start hotjava (a slightly hacked version
of the script which comes
Steve Byrne wrote:
> David Buddrige writes:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have recently downloaded JDK 1.1.6 from
> > ftp.progsoc.uts.edu.au/pub/Linux/java to run on my Redhat 5.1 system...
> > I've un-tar'ed it into /usr/local/jdk1.1.6, and then added
David Buddrige writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I have recently downloaded JDK 1.1.6 from
> ftp.progsoc.uts.edu.au/pub/Linux/java to run on my Redhat 5.1 system...
> I've un-tar'ed it into /usr/local/jdk1.1.6, and then added the following
> lines to my /etc/profile file
Hi all,
I have recently downloaded JDK 1.1.6 from
ftp.progsoc.uts.edu.au/pub/Linux/java to run on my Redhat 5.1 system...
I've un-tar'ed it into /usr/local/jdk1.1.6, and then added the following
lines to my /etc/profile file
PATH="$PATH:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/local/jdk1.
it really hasn't been about the versions of the 21x64x processors, but rather
of HTML space on my ISP. ( now its also about bandwidth @ 250 mb/month xfer ) .
It just takes me about 36 min to do a complete compile ( .c & .java ), less if
i just redo the .o's.
such is life for me at the moment
gat
i'd like to try 2.0, but u should note that I am not a part of the blackdown
port team.
my 116 on an alpha/164LX/533 mhz/linux 2.0.33 with volanomark 1.0 gives
these results:
Please send this file to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for posting.
java.vendor= Sun Microsystems Inc., ported by Randy Chapm
Hi Dan,
> Thanks John for updating us with the new results!
> Great, we're now neck and neck with that speed demon, MRJ 2.0 :-)
It looks as if FreeBSD's JDK 1.1.6 port is the same speed (for
VolanoMark) as their JDK 1.1.5, but they also fixed that nasty socket
timeout bug I was
John Neffenger wrote:
> Linux JDK 1.1.6 v4a 317, 321, 319 320 (+ 37%)
Thanks John for updating us with the new results!
Great, we're now neck and neck with that speed demon, MRJ 2.0 :-)
Does the the Volano benchmark run
with the TYA JIT (http://www.tya.home.ml.org)?
Or
same VolanoMark 2.0.0 Build 137 that I used in my August
JavaWorld article, I get the new scores shown below -- a 37% performance
improvement over JDK 1.1.6 Version 2! From the stress tests I've run,
it seems to be very stable as well.
VolanoMark 2.0.0 Build 137 Loopback Test
Java virtu
blem is, that I wrote the code with jdk-1.1.3,
> changed my
> system to Redhat 5.1 (with glibc) and jdk-1.1.6 and now it
> doesn't
> work anymore. As long as stdout is empty there are no
> problems
> but when the prog tries to read the messages it simply
> hang
Hi all,
I encountered a problem when I start a prog from my
java-prog and
try to get the stdout or stderr.
The problem is, that I wrote the code with jdk-1.1.3,
changed my
system to Redhat 5.1 (with glibc) and jdk-1.1.6 and now it
doesn't
work anymore. As long as stdout is empty there a
Dear Porting Team!
I frequently surf to the Blackdown site to see if
there is a new JDK version for Linux.
I wanted to download your new version 4a, but I could
not find it on any listed mirror. What has happened?
By the waz, can you tell me anything about the porting
status of JDK 1.2?
Best R
Hi,
Did you by any chance read the release that Karl posted that announced the
JDK116_v4a? It talks about seg-faults and points people to the FAQ which
has lots of things to try to help sort out old/new/incompatible system
shared libraries. The FAQ talks about ld.so 1.9.9 and some problems it
se
Hello.
I recently downloaded JDK 1.1.6 4a in the belief that it
would go very smoothly, but I haven't got it running here
whatsoever. I get he following message when for example
trying to run a demo:
SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
Full thread dump:
Monitor Cache Dump:
Regis
On Wed, 2 Sep 1998, Dan Kegel wrote:
> The trick is to go to the redhat search *page*, then
> use the ftp site search for jdk. One thing it finds is
>
>
>ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/contrib/grouped/libc5/i386/Development/Languages/Java/jdk-1.1.5-8.i386.rpm
>
> I find it easy enough to just use
On Wed, 2 Sep 1998, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Dirk Vanhalle wrote:
> > Sorry if this is has been asked before.
> > Is there a RPM for JDK 1.1.6 (sbb), libc 5 version available ?
> > I tried RedHat, but there seems to be only a glibc version or a 1.1.5 RPM.
>
> The trick is
Dirk Vanhalle wrote:
> Sorry if this is has been asked before.
> Is there a RPM for JDK 1.1.6 (sbb), libc 5 version available ?
> I tried RedHat, but there seems to be only a glibc version or a 1.1.5 RPM.
The trick is to go to the redhat search *page*, then
use the ftp site search for
Hi
Sorry if this is has been asked before.
Is there a RPM for JDK 1.1.6 (sbb), libc 5 version available ?
I tried RedHat, but there seems to be only a glibc version or a 1.1.5 RPM.
Did I overlook something ?
Thanks,
Dirk.
>Da: Damiano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Oggetto: Jdk 1.1.6 and Java Web Server Trial 1.1
>Data: Monday, August 31, 1998 12:35 PM
>
>With the followinf config:
> RedHat 5.0, glibc 2.0.7-13, jdk 1.1.6 v2 (of course for glibc)
> Installed under /jdk1.1.6
> javac work
Hi,
Your Linux PowerPC JDK Porting Team is pleased to announce JDK 1.1.6
Version 4a for Linux on PowerPC. This release is available from our
website and should soon be available on our mirrors:
http://business.tyler.wm.edu/mklinux/index.html
or for slower connections that don't like ja
Robert,
I'm somewhat new to this but since I haven't seen your question answered I'll
do my best.
I installed RH 5.0 and grabbed the JDK 1.1.3 (not the rpm version) a couple
of months ago with the same problem.
I quickly found out through this great mailing list that a patch,
(glibc-2.0.7-7.i386
Hello all,
I wonder if someone has run into this problem. I have installed JDK1.1.6
from the .rpm obtained from blackdown.org. I am running Linux 2.0.32
(RH 5.0), and although RH 5.0 came with glibc.so.6, I have gone ahead
and installed glibc.so.7. (Same problem w/ both versions of glibc;
I've al
how about showing us the o/p of ldconfig -v?
On Tue, 11 Aug 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi to all!
>
> I have a problem to install the jdk 1.1.6 because i don´t know if i have
> to download for libc5 or glibc, i read that glibc is for distributions
> like redhat or de
Hi to all!
I have a problem to install the jdk 1.1.6 because i don´t know if i have
to download for libc5 or glibc, i read that glibc is for distributions
like redhat or debian, i'm using slackware, and i've download for libc5
but i'm not sure if this is correct, anyway when i
Hey, I am a developer at VertiSoft Inc, and I seem to have discovered a
bug in your version of the linux JDK. The bug appears to be in the AWT
listbox component. I am attaching the classes/source for a JDBC based
application in a zip file. You will need to get the SolidDriver for
java from www.
tting SWING_HOME=/usr/local/swing-1.0.1
> > and tried the older SwingSet demo. The same result it did not
> > work.
> >
> > I thought the problem was the JDK so I ran some other Swing
> > demos. The other demos work as normal as before. Swing1.1beta
> > an
9 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: SwingSet demo does not go on JDK 1.1.6 v2 libc5
>
> I think this may be low priority, but worth looking into.
>
> After I installed JDK 1.1.6v2-libc.tar.gz with ld.so.1.9.9
> and I also installed the Swing-1.1beta.zip.
>
>
older Swing1.0.1 work with JDK 1.1.6 v2 libc5
Conclusion:
SwingSet demo does NOT work at all, but any other test of applet e.g
the new JFileChooserDemo work wonderfully.
#include // Blankety Blank!
Hi,
Your Linux PowerPC JDK Porting Team is pleased to announce JDK 1.1.6
Version 3 for Linux on PowerPC. This release is available from our
website and should soon be available on our mirrors:
http://business.tyler.wm.edu/mklinux/index.html
or for slower connections that don't like ja
From: Steve Byrne
>DAVID BALAZIC writes:
> > Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> >
> > >DAVID BALAZIC writes:
> > > > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386
> > > >
> > > > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 li
From: Steve Byrne
>Michael Plump writes:
> > On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote:
> >
> > > I also have ld.so 1.9.9 , does that matter ?
> >
> > I downgraded to ld.so.1.9.6 and got the exact same errors (I even diffed
> > the two error files, and they were EXACTLY the same...)
>
>Your erro
When trying to run java ICQ (icq.com) or Getright (getright.com), java dies
and spits out a couple of screens of debug information. ICQ _did_ work with
kernel v2.1.101, but failled to work when the kernel was recompiled. Now
running 2.1.106 and still neither works. Any ideas as to a
solution wo
On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> Your errors are different -- there have been reports of people having a
> completely working environment with 1.9.8 (as I recall) and things failing
> immediately with 1.9.9. JDK is starting for you? Do simple AWT apps work?
ehhh there was one file I f
DAVID BALAZIC writes:
> Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>
> >DAVID BALAZIC writes:
> > > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386
> > >
> > > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386
> > >
> &g
Michael Plump writes:
> On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote:
>
> > I also have ld.so 1.9.9 , does that matter ?
>
> I downgraded to ld.so.1.9.6 and got the exact same errors (I even diffed
> the two error files, and they were EXACTLY the same...)
Your errors are different -- there ha
Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>DAVID BALAZIC writes:
> > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386
> >
> > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386
> >
> > but not on JDK 1.1.3 v 3.0.1 for IRIX on an SGI machine
> >
> &
>On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote:
>
>> I also have ld.so 1.9.9 , does that matter ?
>
>I downgraded to ld.so.1.9.6 and got the exact same errors (I even diffed
>the two error files, and they were EXACTLY the same...)
Reverting to ld 1.9.5 fixes the problems !
Details :
jdk 1.1.6v1 libc5
hi,
I'm just uploading Steve's jdk port 1.1.6 v2 test1 to redhat's incoming.
I'm change the name of the jdk rpms to be able to keep both port
in redhat's contrib area. new rpms are
Steve Byrne's port
jdk-sbb-1.1.6-2.1glibc.i386.rpm
jdk-sbb-1.1.6-2.1glibc.src.rpm
Sergej Nikitin's port
jdk-sn-1.1.
On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote:
> I also have ld.so 1.9.9 , does that matter ?
I downgraded to ld.so.1.9.6 and got the exact same errors (I even diffed
the two error files, and they were EXACTLY the same...)
Mich
Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>Michael Plump writes:
> > On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote:
> >
> > > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386
> > >
> > > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386
&
On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> Hold on there -- I don't think the guy you mention has the same problem. He's
> using ld 1.9.9, which seems to have broken binary compatibility with earlier
> versions of ld (like 1.9.6). I'm pretty sure that's the cause of the problem
wait a minute...
Michael Plump writes:
> On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote:
>
> > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386
> >
> > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386
> >
> > SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
> > sta
DAVID BALAZIC writes:
> This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386
>
> I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386
>
> but not on JDK 1.1.3 v 3.0.1 for IRIX on an SGI machine
>
> I have an ancient Slackware distribution on x86 machine.
> I upgraded ma
On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote:
> This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386
>
> I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386
>
> SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
> stackbase=0xb8e0, stackpointer=0xb7ec
> ...
FWIW, I also get
David,
Just thought I'd let you know that your program works properly on my
Slackware libc5 system with Steve's 1.1.5v5 JDK port. Kernel 2.0.32.
-M@
--
Matthew Hixson http://www.frozenwave.com/~hixson
FroZenWave Communications [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux
This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386
I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386
but not on JDK 1.1.3 v 3.0.1 for IRIX on an SGI machine
I have an ancient Slackware distribution on x86 machine.
I upgraded manually most of SW , so I have pretty recent everything.
The
-Original Message-
From: Ulrich Kortenkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> "mkos" == mkos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>mkos> /jre/bin/java: /jre/bin/../bin/Linux/grenn-threads/java: No
>mkos> such file or directory /jre/bin/java:
>mkos> /jre/bin/../bin/Linux/grenn-threads/java: No
> "mkos" == mkos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
mkos> hi i've donwloaded the jre 1.1.6 from www.blackdown.org/~sbb
mkos> and i've copied the files from the compressed file to the
mkos> directory /jre and now i'll run ICQjave (from
mkos> www.icq.com/download/step-by-step-java.htm
hi
i've donwloaded the jre 1.1.6 from www.blackdown.org/~sbb and i've
copied the files from the compressed file to the directory /jre and now
i'll run ICQjave (from www.icq.com/download/step-by-step-java.html), but
the problem that there's only this message when i run it:
/jre/bin/java: /jre/bin/
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jason Dillon writes:
Where can I find the latest version of 1.1.6 in non-rpm format?
Jason,
Please see (currently) section 8.5 in
http://www.place.org/~stevemw/java/FAQ/FAQ-java-linux.html
Your comments on readability are welcome.
Steve
Where can I find the latest version of 1.1.6 in non-rpm format?
--jason
I've had some serious problems with non-english characters in the linux-port of
jdk.
Characters like "ÅÄÖ" are not displayed in a text-field, except when
using Helvetica or Times Roman fonts.
This problem has been present in all versions of jdk1.1.5 and also in the new
trial version of jdk1.1.6.
A
On Tue, 19 May 1998, David Tarendash wrote:
> Has anyone using 1.1.6 on any other (ahem) platforms, noticed any new
> features? Such as windows not resizing, Calendar's not working, Sockets
> not accepting??? A HUGE increase in memory consumption? (Our App...will
> increase the NT mem-monitor to
Has anyone using 1.1.6 on any other (ahem) platforms, noticed any new
features? Such as windows not resizing, Calendar's not working, Sockets
not accepting??? A HUGE increase in memory consumption? (Our App...will
increase the NT mem-monitor to '48M' on 1.1.5..and not grow, however, on
1.1.6...it
* Steve Byrne
| causing the instability in the builds, I'll go ahead and make a version for
| libc generally available.
would it be possible to get one for glibc too?
Keep up the excellent work!
--
Preben Randhol| Affliction is enamoured of thy parts,
Tlf73940929/(735)
I've got a port running. Some of the other folks who are working with me on
the port are experiencing crashes during building of the Java compiler. In
another day or so I'll probably be making the diffs available to those brave
souls who want to try their luck at building, and, if we can isolate
84 matches
Mail list logo
