RE: [stevemw@northwest.com: Re: jdk1.1.6v1-test]

1998-05-30 Thread Steve Byrne
David B. Rees writes: > On 29-May-98 Steve Byrne wrote: > > > > > > I just (more or less) confirmed that there seems to be a conflict > > > problem between the stock jdk1.1.6v1-test and ld.so-1.9.9. > > I've also got this same pro

jdk1.1.6v1-test

1998-05-29 Thread Todd M. Roy
I just (more or less) confirmed that there seems to be a conflict > > problem between the stock jdk1.1.6v1-test and ld.so-1.9.9. > > > > I've had this problem on both Linux machines I can experiment on: > > > > > > 0. with

RE: [stevemw@northwest.com: Re: jdk1.1.6v1-test]

1998-05-29 Thread David B. Rees
On 29-May-98 Steve Byrne wrote: > > > > I just (more or less) confirmed that there seems to be a conflict > > problem between the stock jdk1.1.6v1-test and ld.so-1.9.9. I've also got this same problem with the stock jdk1.1.5-v7 and ld.so-1.9.9. This i

[stevemw@northwest.com: Re: jdk1.1.6v1-test]

1998-05-29 Thread Steve Byrne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > I just (more or less) confirmed that there seems to be a conflict > problem between the stock jdk1.1.6v1-test and ld.so-1.9.9. > > I've had this problem on both Linux machines I can experiment on: > > &g

[stevemw@northwest.com: Re: jdk1.1.6v1-test]

1998-05-29 Thread toddroy
I just (more or less) confirmed that there seems to be a conflict problem between the stock jdk1.1.6v1-test and ld.so-1.9.9. I've had this problem on both Linux machines I can experiment on: 0. with ld.so-1.9.8 installed: 1. Installed jdk1.