Thanks to all you guys! :)
I will try it (most probabily next week) and report back to the mailing
list.
The main reasons are:
1) I would like to deploy on multi-processor Linux systems without
lacking in scalability;
2) If it works, not only Catalina will benefit from this, but the
overall se
Cool I'm curious too, as I have
an MP server...
regards
v
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 09:30:33AM +0200, Marco Trevisan wrote:
>Thanks to all you guys! :)
>
>I will try it (most probabily next week) and report back to the mailing
>list.
>The main reasons are:
>1) I would like to deploy on multi-proc
I just had a look at the mail-archive of their mailing-list. There is a
statement clarifying, their stuff will NOT work with current JVMs.
Look here:
http://www-124.ibm.com/pipermail/pthreads-users/2002-August/000250.html
It seems also Sun will not support NGPT anytime soon, as they focus on
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 10:30:46AM +0200, Ingo Rockel wrote:
> I just had a look at the mail-archive of their mailing-list. There is a
> statement clarifying, their stuff will NOT work with current JVMs.
>
> Look here:
> http://www-124.ibm.com/pipermail/pthreads-users/2002-August/000250.html
>
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 07:59:30AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> As I wrote in a previous message, Sun is abandoning M:N threading;
> see http://java.sun.com/docs/hotspot/threads/threads.html
> NGPT is probably a dead end. I suspect Gnu and Linux will continue
> on with kernel-based threads, but with
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 08:41:07AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> You're referring to Linuxthreads? It has a couple other problems,
> like pid being different for each thread, and thread startup and
> shutdown
> not being as fast as thread maniacs (you know, the people who create
> more than 1 thread/
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 09:28:37AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I have no idea what Ulrich is planning for his linuxthread replacement,
> but once it's out in the open, we can probably finally fix issues
> like signal delivery.
Is there some public docs on this project ? I'm out of the loop as far
a
