A weighted OR, of course.
On 6 May 2024, at 12:43, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Do I mistake or “ “ makes an OR if there’s no other?
On 6 May 2024, at 12:41, Saha, Rajib wrote:
Hi Experts,
As per the definition in
https://lucene.apache.org/core/2_9_4/queryparsersyntax.html
'-' an
Do I mistake or “ “ makes an OR if there’s no other?
On 6 May 2024, at 12:41, Saha, Rajib wrote:
Hi Experts,
As per the definition in
https://lucene.apache.org/core/2_9_4/queryparsersyntax.html
'-' and 'NOT' in query string stands for same reason theoretically.
[cid:image001.png@01DA9FCF.
Isn’t that what Semantic-Vectors is doing?
E.g. https://github.com/Ontotext-AD/semanticvectors
Paul
On 30 Jan 2024, at 20:50, William Zhou wrote:
> Is there a way of directly executing an exact nearest neighbor search? It
> seems like the API provides some general functionality, and
queries and in the
score’s fineness, it was indicating thing sub-query was used. This was
used to attempt highlighting matching of the parts of a formula.
Paul
On 17 Mar 2021, at 20:24, Diego Ceccarelli (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) wrote:
Maybe using explain?
https://chrisperks.co/2017/06/06/explaining
that the
influence of a positive category takes precedence over the different
orderings (TF-IDF per default).
At the end you can write custom-score-engine but I can only imagine
ruining the performance when doing so...
paul
On 26 Feb 2021, at 3:40, Philip Warner wrote:
I am sorry if this has
you are using may not
have
replicated the release yet. If that is the case, please try another mirror.
This also applies to Maven access.
- -
Noble Paul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: FlowCrypt Email Encryption 8.0.0
Comment: Seamlessly
parametrisation).
But I’d be happy to read of others’ works on this!
In the Math working group of W3C at the time, work stopped when
considering the complexity of compound documents: the alternatives as
above (mix words or recognise math pieces?) certainly made things
difficult.
paul
PS: [paper for
e_logo_green_300.png
> >>
> >> Please vote for one of the above choices. This vote will close about one
> >> week from today, Mon, Sept 7, 2020 at 11:59PM.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> [jira-issue] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9221
> >> [first-vote]
> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/202006.mbox/%3cCA+DiXd74Mz4H6o9SmUNLUuHQc6Q1-9mzUR7xfxR03ntGwo=d...@mail.gmail.com%3e
> >> [second-vote]
> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/202009.mbox/%3cCA+DiXd7eBrQu5+aJQ3jKaUtUTJUqaG2U6o+kUZfNe-m=smn...@mail.gmail.com%3e
> >> [rank-choice-voting] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
--
-
Noble Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
tps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9221
> [first-vote]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/202006.mbox/%3cCA+DiXd74Mz4H6o9SmUNLUuHQc6Q1-9mzUR7xfxR03ntGwo=d...@mail.gmail.com%3e
> [rank-choice-voting] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting
>
>
--
-
Noble Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
CVE-2018-11802: Apache Solr authorization bug disclosure
Severity: Important
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected: Apache Solr 7.6 or less
Description:
jira ticket : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12514
In apache Solr the cluster can be partitioned into multiple
co
re and sign the petition here:
> >
> > http://chng.it/vY78rzGf8G
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Janaka
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional
Awesome! Thank you very much!
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Christoph Kaser
wrote:
> Hello Paul,
>
> this is already possible using
> DirectoryReader.openIfChanged(indexReader,indexWriter).
> This will give you an indexreader that already "sees" all changes ma
hable after another one even though it was
added before.
The benefit would be to reduce the average latency for a document
to become searchable, without hurting throughput by calling commit() too
frequently.
Regards,
Paul
have this info all on
> ReleaseTodo.
>
> Maybe instead the item should say: "go here and follow the steps:
> PublishMavenArtifacts.” That way it’s clear it’s not optional.
>
> Steve
>
> > On Sep 30, 2015, at 7:39 AM, Noble Paul wrote:
> >
> > I have been edi
Everything looks good now, thank you.
>>
>> --Terry
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Noble Paul wrote:
>>
>>> Please check now
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
>>> > Looks like I missed it
Please check now
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> Looks like I missed it , I shall upload it soon
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Terry Smith wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> I'm unable to find the 5.3.1 artifacts in maven cen
> 5.3.0.
>
> http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.lucene%22%20AND%20a%3A%22lucene-core%22
>
> Am I doing something wrong or are the artifacts not yet published?
>
> --Terry
--
--
the case, please
try another mirror. This also goes for Maven access.
Noble Paul on behalf of Lucene PMC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h
om code. Is
> there a way to specify runtimeLib="true" on the schema or perhaps an
> alternate method to make sure that jar is loaded on the classpath before
> the schema is loaded?
>
> Thanks for the help,
>
> -Steve
-
://lucene.apache.org/core/discussion.html)
--
-----
Noble Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
On 06/03/2015 15:07, Michael McCandless wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Paul Taylor wrote:
On 05/03/2015 19:01, Michael McCandless wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Paul Taylor
wrote:
On 05/03/2015 15:53, Paul Taylor wrote:
On 05/03/2015 14:43, Michael McCandless wrote:
It
On 06/03/2015 17:34, Michael McCandless wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
Right, did you see my last post the query parser does trap the exception if
you enable assertions. I thought this was what you were saying was fixed in
a later version, but assume you actually
On 06/03/2015 15:07, Michael McCandless wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Paul Taylor wrote:
On 05/03/2015 19:01, Michael McCandless wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Paul Taylor
wrote:
On 05/03/2015 15:53, Paul Taylor wrote:
On 05/03/2015 14:43, Michael McCandless wrote:
It
On 05/03/2015 21:27, Paul Taylor wrote:
FWIW if I do enable assertions then parse does throw an assertion before
actually trying to do the search.
java.lang.AssertionError
at
org.apache.lucene.search.MultiTermQuery.(MultiTermQuery.java:252)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.AutomatonQuery
On 05/03/2015 19:01, Michael McCandless wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Paul Taylor wrote:
On 05/03/2015 15:53, Paul Taylor wrote:
On 05/03/2015 14:43, Michael McCandless wrote:
It looks like field was null?
Back in 4.1.0 we just assert field != null, but in newer releases it
On 05/03/2015 15:53, Paul Taylor wrote:
On 05/03/2015 14:43, Michael McCandless wrote:
It looks like field was null?
Back in 4.1.0 we just assert field != null, but in newer releases it's
a real check.
Mike McCandless
Hi, thankyou Il try and get the query logged for when it next ha
On 05/03/2015 14:43, Michael McCandless wrote:
It looks like field was null?
Back in 4.1.0 we just assert field != null, but in newer releases it's
a real check.
Mike McCandless
Hi, thankyou Il try and get the query logged for when it next happens
t.doSearch(SearchServerServlet.java:616)
at
org.musicbrainz.search.servlet.SearchServerServlet.doGet(SearchServerServlet.java:551)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:618)
thanks Paul
|
I no longer need to keep the song titles, and if I did it
would eventually end up consuming too much memory so I really do need to
abandon lucene for this task and just find the best way to compare two
strings with each other. It already works to a degree using
CosineS
On 03/12/2014 15:14, Barry Coughlan wrote:
Hi Paul,
I don't have much expertise in this area so hopefully others will
answer, but maybe this is better than nothing.
I don't know many out-of-the-box solutions for this problem, but I'm
sure they exist. Mahout and Carrot2
lucene experts on how
to proceed!
Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
ore a question of presentation.
Paul
On 20 nov. 2014, at 16:24, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I cannot compare it to SemanticVectors as I don't know SemanticVectors.
> But word vectors that are produced by word2vec have interesting properties.
>
> Here is the
Hello Koji,
how would you compare that to SemanticVectors?
paul
On 20 nov. 2014, at 10:10, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It's my pleasure to share that I have an interesting tool "word2vec for
> Lucene"
> available at https://github.com/kojisekig/wor
The project semanticvectors might be doing what you are looking for.
paul
On 11 nov. 2014, at 22:37, parnab kumar wrote:
> hi,
>
> While indexing the documents , store the Term Vectors for the content
> field. Now for each document you will have an array of terms and their
>
My trick would be to replace .net with dotNet (or use some funky Unicode-letter
to replace the dot).
If you use consistently the same analyzer-chain, then it will match cleanly.
paul
On 6 nov. 2014, at 12:42, Rajendra Rao wrote:
> I have some word which contain full stop (.) its
ndexes are built with a later version
of lucene than the reading code or something else ?
paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
On 01/10/2014 18:42, Steve Rowe wrote:
Paul,
Boilerplate upgrade recommendation: consider using the most recent Lucene
release (4.10.1) - it’s the most stable, performant, and featureful release
available, and many bugs have been fixed since the 4.1 release.
Yeah sure, I did try this and hit
ead: relatively easy) to create an
analyzer (or a modification of the standard one's lexer) so that
punctuation is returned as a separate token type?
Dawid
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
Hi Paul,
StandardTokenizer implements the Word Boundaries rules in the Unicode Text
S
Does StandardTokenizer remove punctuation (in Lucene 4.1)
Im just trying to move back to StandardTokenizer from my own old custom
implemenation because the newer version seems to have much better
support for Asian languages
However this code except fails on incrementToken() implying that the
two fields?
paul
On 19 sept. 2014, at 15:07, John Cecere wrote:
> Is there a way to set up Lucene so that both case-sensitive and
> case-insensitive searches can be done without having to generate two indexes?
>
> --
> John Cecere
> Principal Engineer - Oracle Corporat
have any experience of this,please ?
Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
ticed that Solr now has the eDismax allow both types to be
supported in one syntax, this would be very useful but I dont want to
move to solr, is eDismax now available in Lucene 4 ?
Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-uns
use case for Lucene, and if so can someone sketch
out a solution so I can connect the dots? Or is there example code, or
documentation for this sort of thing? I've studied dynamic range facets,
but those don't seem right
Ashok,
I would look at solr which has an amount more field types to support more
queries.
E.g. there you have a nice query syntax for times-spans and fantastic caching.
I think there's very few initiatives for indexing logs and I would be
interested to see the results of your entreprise.
ed by the end user application.
Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
On 04/04/2013 23:26, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: At index time I boost the alias field of a small set of documents, setting the
: boost to 2.0f, which I thought meant equivalent to doubling the score this doc
: would get over another doc, everything else being equal.
1) you haven't shown us enough
On 04/04/2013 10:59, Paul Taylor wrote:
On 27/02/2013 10:28, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi Paul,
QueryParser and MTQ's rewrite method have nothing to do with each
other. The rewrite method is (explained as simple as possible) a
class that is responsible to "rewrite" a MultiTermQ
On 27/02/2013 10:28, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi Paul,
QueryParser and MTQ's rewrite method have nothing to do with each other. The rewrite method is (explained as
simple as possible) a class that is responsible to "rewrite" a MultiTermQuery to another query type
(generally a query
All,
Sorry, but I inadvertenly put my post re MultiFieldQueryParser in the wrong
thread (wrong subject via cut and paste).
Igor, thank you for the reply. I will look into what you suggest.
-Paul
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Igor Shalyminov
wrote:
> I personally use SpanNearQuey (s
something about the abstract class MultiTermQuery, but I don't really
understand whether or not it would help with this problem.
Thank you.
-Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additio
quite
crystallized the generic query syntax and don't know how best to map it to
both a Lucene query and to an appropriate Lucene index structure. Please
let me know if you've any suggestions!
Thanks again.
-Paul
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> The first q
uld it make more sense to index on
'inEdges.v123'? The problem with this, I think, is that I can no longer ask
about multiple edges with a single query, right?
Thanks, Jack.
-Paul
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Multivalued fields are the other approach to keyw
are really two parts to this question:
1. Lucene "best practices" for long list
2. Where to store such a list
Thanks for your help.
-Paul
l" type
queries? For example, suppose I want to find all documents whose "name"
field is not equal to a given value...
Thank you.
-Paul
t using the
provided analyzer for tokenization. But be careful! In order for searches
to work correctly, you need the analyzer used at search time to "match" the
tokens produced by the analyzers at indexing time."
Is this warning from the author of a piece with what you're warning me
out the indexing and less about storing documents.
Thank you.
-Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
okenized>
But if I'm interested in just obtaining the "content" field ("This is a
test; for the next..."), what should I do?
-Paul
public class TestLucene
{
public static int id = 0;
public static void main(String[] args)
{
RAMDirectory idx = new
fy the vertex (or
vertices) that matched the query.
Can you shed any light on this issue?
Thanks again.
-Paul
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Sashidhar Guntury <
sashidhar.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi,
>
> I think this stack overflow question might be of some help to you-
>
t as coherent as I can make them.
Thank you.
-Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
I created this simple StripSpacesAndSeparatorsAnalyzer so that it
ignores certain characters such as hypens in the field so that I can
search for
catno:WRATHCD25
catno:WRATHCD-25
and get the same results, and that works (the original value of the
field added to the index was WRATHCD-25)
How
On 26/02/2013 18:01, Paul Taylor wrote:
On 26/02/2013 17:22, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
You cannot override rewrite() because you could easily break the logic
behind TopTermsRewrite. If you want another behavior, subclass another
base class and wrap the TopTermsRewrite instead of subclassing it
l try out your recommendations
Paul
-----Original Message-
From: Paul Taylor [mailto:paul_t...@fastmail.fm]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 5:34 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Uable to extends TopTermsRewrite in Lucene 4.1
In Lucene 3.6 I had code that replicated a Dismax Qu
In Lucene 3.6 I had code that replicated a Dismax Query, and the search
used fuzzy queries in some cases to match values. But I was finding the
score attributed to matches on fuzzy searches was completely different
to the score attributed to matches on exact searches so the total score
returned
FuzzyQuery constructor now takes parameter maxEdits instead of parameter
minSimilarity. But I'm unclear how to map from the old value to the new
value or whether they are unrelated and can no longer be compared.
I was previously using a minsimilarity of 0.5f
thanks
On 26/02/2013 12:29, Paul Taylor wrote:
This code worked in 3.6 but now throws nullpointer exception in 41, Im
not expecting there to be a token created, but surely it shouldn't
throw NullPointerException
Tokenizer tokenizer = new
org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardToke
On 26/02/2013 13:29, Alan Woodward wrote:
Hi Paul,
You need to call tokenizer.reset() before you call incrementToken()
Alan Woodward
www.flax.co.uk <http://www.flax.co.uk>
Hi, thanks that fixes it
This code worked in 3.6 but now throws nullpointer exception in 41, Im
not expecting there to be a token created, but surely it shouldn't throw
NullPointerException
Tokenizer tokenizer = new
org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardTokenizer(Version.LUCENE_41,
new StringReader("!!!"));
to
This works in 3.6, but in 4.1 fails whats wrong with the code
public void testTokenization() throws IOException
{
StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer();
for(char i=0;i<100;i++)
{
Character c = new Character(i);
if(!Character.isWhitespace(c)) {
On 19/02/2013 11:42, Paul Taylor wrote:
What replaces the computeNorm method in DefaultSimilarity in 4.1
Ive always subclassed DefaultSimilarity to resolve an issue whereby
when document has multiple values in a field (because has one-many
relationship) its score worse then a document which
On 25/02/2013 11:24, Thomas Matthijs wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Thomas Matthijs <mailto:li...@selckin.be>> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Thomas Matthijs
mailto:li...@selckin.be>> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:24
On 20/02/2013 11:28, Paul Taylor wrote:
Just updating codebase from Lucene 3.6 to Lucene 4.1 and seems my
tests that use NormalizeCharMap for replacing characters in the
anyalzers are not working.
Below Ive created a self-contained test case, this is the output when
I run it
--term
In my 3.6 code I was adding numeric field to my index as follows:
public void addNumericField(IndexField field, Integer value) {
addField(field, NumericUtils.intToPrefixCoded(value));
}
but I've chnaged it to (work in progress)
public void addNumericField(IndexField field, Integer
On 20/02/2013 11:28, Paul Taylor wrote:
Just updating codebase from Lucene 3.6 to Lucene 4.1 and seems my
tests that use NormalizeCharMap for replacing characters in the
anyalzers are not working.
bump, anybody I thought a self contained testcase would be enough to
pique somebodys interest
ch using same
analyzer. Maybe the problem is with the query parser, but its certainly
related to 4.1 because worked previously.
thanks Paul
package org.musicbrainz.search.analysis;
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.Analyzer;
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.
On 19/02/2013 20:56, Paul Taylor wrote:
Strange test failure after converting code from Lucene 3.6 to Lucene 4.1
public void testIndexPuid() throws Exception {
addReleaseOne();
RAMDirectory ramDir = new RAMDirectory();
createIndex(ramDir);
IndexReader ir
Strange test failure after converting code from Lucene 3.6 to Lucene 4.1
public void testIndexPuid() throws Exception {
addReleaseOne();
RAMDirectory ramDir = new RAMDirectory();
createIndex(ramDir);
IndexReader ir = IndexReader.open(ramDir);
Fields fiel
What replaces the computeNorm method in DefaultSimilarity in 4.1
Ive always subclassed DefaultSimilarity to resolve an issue whereby when
document has multiple values in a field (because has one-many
relationship) its score worse then a document which just has single
value but the computeNorm
ValueSource referring to the DocValues field, 5 lines of code -> and it will
return consistent results!
Uwe
Thanks bit clearer now, but 5 line example would be nice
And if this is the way to do things isnt the migration doc incorrect
Paul
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bre
different to what the
migration guide says so I don't see that as an improvement.
Paul
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Paul Taylor [mailto:paul_t...@fastmail.fm]
Sent: Monday, Februar
tance sharing the same field name
should only include their per-field boost and not the document level
boost) as the boost for multi-valued field instances are multiplied
together by Lucene."
--
Ian.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Paul Taylor wrote:
What is equivalent to Document.setBo
What is equivalent to Document.setBoost() from Lucene 3.6 inLucene 4.1 ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
, that zero-length is not checked in
getNode()). Unfortunately I don't understand checkBattenberg() well
enough to delve any further - so I'm stuck.
Any help is very much appreciated, thanks,
Paul
Find below a stacktrace of the Exception:
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrExcept
redDocs( conf.getInt( "indexer.minMergeDocs",
1000 ) );
..
this.luceneWriter = new IndexWriter( directory, iwconf );
Thanks,
Paul
--
--
Paul Sitowitz
sitow...@gmail.com
703-626-3593
seableThreadLocal) of the superclass, shoudnt there just be the one
per instance of the analyzer ?
(Using Lucene 3.6.0)
Paul
Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional comm
I've been investigating potential memory leaks in my Lucene based
application thats runs on jetty. I did a memory dump with jmap and one
thing I've noticed is that for any subclass of analyzer that I have
created that there are alot instances of the $SavedStream inner class.
So for example I c
is only a thought, because I haven't upgraded to 4.0 yet.
-Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: Igal Sapir [mailto:i...@getrailo.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 11:42 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Upgrade Lucene to latest version (4.0) from 2.4.0
added.
That would be one of the main points of the whole ICU infrastructure.
-Paul
The ICU project ( http://site.icu-project.org/ ) has Analyzers for Lucene and
it has been ported to ElasticSearch. Maybe those integrate better.
As to not doing some tokenization, I would think an extra tokenizer in you
chain would be just the thing.
-Paul
> -Original Message-
>
e.
Using this really powers you up quite much into expanding into a useful set of
available languages.
Also, you could use the whitespace tokenizer as a simple analyzer for an
"exact" field.
paul
indexes of
artists, usually the user just searches artists or releases. But
sometimes they want to search all and interleave the results from the
two indexes, but its not sensible for me to interleave them based on
their score at the moment.
t
ures being based on NFS and corruption is something I've never
heard about.
Note: no concurrent access to a lucene index, right?
Paul
Le 2 oct. 2012 à 14:01, Jong Kim a écrit :
> Thank you all for reply.
>
> So it soudns like it is a known fact that the performance would suffe
My experience in the Lucene 1.x times were a factor of at least four in writing
to NFS and about two when reading from there. I'd discourage this as much as
possible!
(rsync is way more your friend for transporting and replication à la solr
should also be considered)
paul
Le 2 oct. 2
elease IndexSearchers or
something, anyway trying to get a stack dump done
Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
this is running on, I know
this question is a bit vague but I would appreciate some ideas where to
investigate next
thanks Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
> most sentences around Lucene what I searched out aren't compiled correctly.
> wondering if we build our local mailing list...
Which language?
paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
index created using Lucene 3.01 by our first product? OR, will we have to
"bite the bullet" and upgrade BOTH products to use the latest version of Lucene?
Thanks in advance for you response.
Sincerely,
Paul Sitowitz
P a u l S i t o w i t z
Core E
If only 30GB, go with RAM and MMAPDirectory (as long as you have the budget
for that hardware).
My understanding is that RAMDirectory is intended for unit tests, not for
production indexes.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Dragon Fly wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If I want to improve performance, which of
faster.
But I can't say what the tradeoff would be if you wanted most fields at each
step in the search.
Good luck,
-Paul
response try using less common words
and a few more of them and you won't run into your too-huge documents unless
you really want to see them.
So is there NO way to read the "all_text" field and only read _the_start_ of it?
Otherwise, I'm thinking I'll go with an e
y (or closer to) what you need
in it.
-Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: Li Li [mailto:fancye...@gmail.com]
> our old map implementation use about 10 ms, while newer one is 40
> ms. the reason is we need to return some fields of all hitted documents. the
> fields are not ver
1 - 100 of 1033 matches
Mail list logo
