m Denniss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 5:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JAVA3D] Fw: Future of Java 3D is in Question
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 05:51, Michael Pfeiffer wrote:
> At least this information is more than a assertion without substance that
> J3D is
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 05:51, Michael Pfeiffer wrote:
> At least this information is more than a assertion without substance that
> J3D is dead. I wrote to Sun some time ago too to get information about the
> future and received this information on 18. 09. 2003:
>
Since the word "dead" seems to o
Yep,
Sounds like we both got the party line on this one!
-RJ
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Pfeiffer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [JAVA3D] Fw: Future of Java 3D is in Question
> At least
At least this information is more than a assertion without substance that
J3D is dead. I wrote to Sun some time ago too to get information about the
future and received this information on 18. 09. 2003:
"Hi Michael,
We are committed to supporting Java 3D. We are still working out the plans
for how
