On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 17:26:48 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a change to reorganize the internal low-level support for HTML
>> in the jdk.javadoc module.
>>
>> Hitherto, there are two separate sets of classes for low-level support for
>> HTML in the `jdk.javadoc` module: one, in d
> Please review a change to reorganize the internal low-level support for HTML
> in the jdk.javadoc module.
>
> Hitherto, there are two separate sets of classes for low-level support for
> HTML in the `jdk.javadoc` module: one, in doclint, focused on reading and
> checking classes, the other, i
> Please review a change to reorganize the internal low-level support for HTML
> in the jdk.javadoc module.
>
> Hitherto, there are two separate sets of classes for low-level support for
> HTML in the `jdk.javadoc` module: one, in doclint, focused on reading and
> checking classes, the other, i
On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 11:53:29 GMT, Hannes Wallnöfer wrote:
>> Jonathan Gibbons has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 12 commits:
>>
>> - Merge with upstream master;
>>add reference in HtmlTag to a related RFE
>> - Up
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:00:11 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a change to reorganize the internal low-level support for HTML
>> in the jdk.javadoc module.
>>
>> Hitherto, there are two separate sets of classes for low-level support for
>> HTML in the `jdk.javadoc` module: one, in
> Please review a change to reorganize the internal low-level support for HTML
> in the jdk.javadoc module.
>
> Hitherto, there are two separate sets of classes for low-level support for
> HTML in the `jdk.javadoc` module: one, in doclint, focused on reading and
> checking classes, the other, i
> Please review a change to reorganize the internal low-level support for HTML
> in the jdk.javadoc module.
>
> Hitherto, there are two separate sets of classes for low-level support for
> HTML in the `jdk.javadoc` module: one, in doclint, focused on reading and
> checking classes, the other, i
On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:02:32 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> I'll look to upgrade these. In the original impl of DocLint, it was
>> something of a conscious decision to avoid supporting input elements.
>>
>> I'm surprised LINK is phrasing content: I thought it could only appear in
>> HEAD elem
On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 17:50:43 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/html/HtmlTag.java line 87:
>>
>>> 85: attrs(AttrKind.HTML4, CLEAR)),
>>> 86:
>>> 87: BUTTON(BlockType.OTHER, EndKind.REQUIRED,
>>
>> Several tag constants that use `B
> Please review a change to reorganize the internal low-level support for HTML
> in the jdk.javadoc module.
>
> Hitherto, there are two separate sets of classes for low-level support for
> HTML in the `jdk.javadoc` module: one, in doclint, focused on reading and
> checking classes, the other, i
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 10:52:22 GMT, Hannes Wallnöfer wrote:
>> Jonathan Gibbons has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Cleanup use of HtmlStyle and HtmlStyles
>
> src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/html/HtmlTag.jav
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 22:09:46 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a change to reorganize the internal low-level support for HTML
>> in the jdk.javadoc module.
>>
>> Hitherto, there are two separate sets of classes for low-level support for
>> HTML in the `jdk.javadoc` module: one, in
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 22:09:46 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a change to reorganize the internal low-level support for HTML
>> in the jdk.javadoc module.
>>
>> Hitherto, there are two separate sets of classes for low-level support for
>> HTML in the `jdk.javadoc` module: one, in
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 22:09:46 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a change to reorganize the internal low-level support for HTML
>> in the jdk.javadoc module.
>>
>> Hitherto, there are two separate sets of classes for low-level support for
>> HTML in the `jdk.javadoc` module: one, in
> Please review a change to reorganize the internal low-level support for HTML
> in the jdk.javadoc module.
>
> Hitherto, there are two separate sets of classes for low-level support for
> HTML in the `jdk.javadoc` module: one, in doclint, focused on reading and
> checking classes, the other, i
> Please review a change to reorganize the internal low-level support for HTML
> in the jdk.javadoc module.
>
> Hitherto, there are two separate sets of classes for low-level support for
> HTML in the `jdk.javadoc` module: one, in doclint, focused on reading and
> checking classes, the other, i
On Mon, 8 Jul 2024 19:18:21 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a change to reorganize the internal low-level support for HTML
>> in the jdk.javadoc module.
>>
>> Hitherto, there are two separate sets of classes for low-level support for
>> HTML in the `jdk.javadoc` module: one, in d
> Please review a change to reorganize the internal low-level support for HTML
> in the jdk.javadoc module.
>
> Hitherto, there are two separate sets of classes for low-level support for
> HTML in the `jdk.javadoc` module: one, in doclint, focused on reading and
> checking classes, the other, i
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 13:36:47 GMT, Hannes Wallnöfer wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is intentional (it makes changes easier to review), but
> I notice that imports of classes in the new package are generally mixed with
> classes remaining in the old package, and therefore not in alphabetic order.
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 23:00:27 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Please review a change to reorganize the internal low-level support for HTML
> in the jdk.javadoc module.
>
> Hitherto, there are two separate sets of classes for low-level support for
> HTML in the `jdk.javadoc` module: one, in docli
20 matches
Mail list logo
