WTF? I already posted a much better version of this in the
supermegauber thread. no need for class file hacking. sun.misc.Unsafe
is an even worse idea (Security Manager issues, as well as a
dependency on running in sun VMs).
public class SneakyThrow {
public static RuntimeException
Christian Catchpole wrote:
Compile this.. (any package you like, or no package at all)
public class Rethrow {
public static void unchecked(Throwable t) {
t=t;
}
}
javap reports the byte code as..
public static void unchecked(java.lang.Throwable);
Code:
Stack=1,
yeah, don't take too much notice of that. i noticed that if you
disassemble a throw, it doesn't have a return. but the a=a does.
maybe its requirement of bytecode that a method that does return,
finishes with return byte code. but its like Java strings being a
char array with a size. there's
Oops. i totally misread your comment.. yeah, i was surprised as
well. :)
On Aug 26, 7:53 pm, Fabrizio Giudici fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it
wrote:
Christian Catchpole wrote:
Compile this.. (any package you like, or no package at all)
public class Rethrow {
public static void
of course it's need a return if it's NOT being JITted... im talking a
load of crap tonight.. aload_0 f crap.. get it! :)
On Aug 26, 8:09 pm, Christian Catchpole christ...@catchpole.net
wrote:
yeah, don't take too much notice of that. i noticed that if you
disassemble a throw, it doesn't have
Putting a project on Kenai requires the choice of an open source license
scheme. In Netbeans you'll get a combobox with the names. And if I'm not
mistaken it can show you the licence terms at http://opensource.org/.
I guess, if I were a jurist of some sorts these terms would be without
question.
Hi Jan
OSS Watch provides guidance albeit it is geared to helping the UK
academic community:
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk/
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/ipr.xml
Hope that helps.
Cheers
Mike
2009/8/26 Jan Goyvaerts java.arti...@gmail.com:
Putting a project on Kenai requires the choice
i guess nowadays javac translates almost literally the source code
into bytecode, leaving the hard work for JIT
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Christian
Catchpolechrist...@catchpole.net wrote:
of course it's need a return if it's NOT being JITted... im talking a
load of crap tonight..
Thanks, Reinier, I submitted an issue.
As far as field prefixes, it's in our style guide and I've been doing
it forever, but I'm starting to question it. As Roel mentioned, IDEs
help you distinguish them. Our Groovy classes certainly don't have
prefixes. It's cleaner... Hmm...
So how many
im guessing its because of the receiving side of the append
function? have not tried, but id hope that
two + three + one()
would become
two three + one()
?
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Alexey Zingerinline_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
There are quite a few optimizations with strings, for
The pain of being an idiot, not reading the javadoc on sneakyThrows,
and presuming that the return value has any meaning whatsoever is not
something I'm going to get concerned about. Everyone is an idiot
sometime, but there's a line, and that's far removed from it.
Contrast this to the sheer
Reinier I wanted to do a less invasive version of
disableCheckedExceptions, however I can not get your initial
disableCheckedExceptions to run:
error: Exception thrown while constructing Processor object:
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: Error looking up function
'Agent_OnAttach': javac:
lombok's @SneakyThrows is a magical way of throwing checked
exceptions. the lombok proof of concept spinoff
'disableCheckedExceptions' goes a lot further - though that might be a
bit beyond what you were looking for.
more info:
http://projectlombok.org/features/SneakyThrows.html
Thanks ! That's indeed the kind of accessible explanations I am
looking for.
What would be the logical choice for a care-free open source project ?
Everybody can use it, modify it, bla bla bla and the usage is your
sole responsability.
On Aug 26, 1:55 pm, Mike Jones mike.a.jo...@gmail.com
BSD all the way
On Aug 26, 2009, at 2:27 PM, Jan Goyvaerts wrote:
Thanks ! That's indeed the kind of accessible explanations I am
looking for.
What would be the logical choice for a care-free open source project ?
Everybody can use it, modify it, bla bla bla and the usage is your
sole
Yes, the desire for the throw dawned on me. Not that you included
such javadoc in this thread.
On Aug 27, 2:59 am, Reinier Zwitserloot reini...@gmail.com wrote:
The pain of being an idiot, not reading the javadoc on sneakyThrows,
and presuming that the return value has any meaning whatsoever
My class did have debug symbols. I guess no point having symbols that
don't point to anything.
On Aug 27, 3:32 am, Marcelo Fukushima takesh...@gmail.com wrote:
i guess nowadays javac translates almost literally the source code
into bytecode, leaving the hard work for JIT
On Wed, Aug 26,
After Project Lombok was first mentioned here I was thinking how this could
work with mixins, and again after listening about the mixins for java
(hereon known as M4J) project mentioned on the last show, and watching the
video at http://www.berniecode.com/writing/java-mixins/ I was thinking about
Simple.
public class Something extends Whatever implements List {
private @Delegate List listDelegate = new ArrayList();
}
lombok would add all methods that exist in List.java (as that is the
type of 'listDelegate' - arraylist is merely what's assigned to it,
it's about the type of the
Yes, I once used Apache 2.0 but now I'm thinking New BSD is the way to
go. And one of the main reasons I read was that, especially to non-
java people, many see BSD and immediately understand what that's
going to be. It's also easier when more and more licenses are
becoming BSD. And it
Without being abstract, and without IDE support this would throw errors as
the class/source doesn't implement the List interface, but lombok could (if
possible) drop the abstract bytecode marker, and use an implementation
mentioned in the annotation.
public abstract class Something extends
Nope; lombok injects those methods well before the latter stages of
the error finding process runs - which is where problematic typing
relations, such as missing methods that you ought to implement due to
an interface, are found. It's just like using getFoo(); in your own
method when getFoo() is
For javac maybe, but not for IDEA or Netbeans, or eclipse without the lombok
plugin (thats more what I was meaning).
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Reinier Zwitserloot reini...@gmail.comwrote:
Nope; lombok injects those methods well before the latter stages of
the error finding process runs
Hello everyone , im trying and trying to configure a project with
maven, spring and jpa. I had read read all google and can´t resolve
the problems.
first all code is here:
http://code.google.com/p/base2dev/source/browse/#svn/src/trunk/base2dev
i have so differents troubles . now are throwing
Does BSD have the be cool on the patents clause to provide author
protection etc? from what I remember, other then that they are very
similar. But BSD style seems to mean (in most peoples minds these
days) the most liberal to everyone (user and author, not just
author).
On Aug 27, 8:34 am,
25 matches
Mail list logo
