On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Robert Casto casto.rob...@gmail.comwrote:
Well, I'm sure Google doesn't like their own stuff being used against them.
They are trying to be too nice perhaps letting anyone fork the system. It is
going to get very difficult to support all these devices and
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Miroslav Pokorny
miroslav.poko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Robert Casto casto.rob...@gmail.comwrote:
Well, I'm sure Google doesn't like their own stuff being used against
them. They are trying to be too nice perhaps letting anyone
Thanx for clarifying, either way niceness is not a correct reasoning either.
The goal was to make Android ubiquitous and enable Internet connectivity and
not licensing revenues.
On 23/09/2010, at 2:26 AM, Cédric Beust ♔ ced...@beust.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Miroslav
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Miroslav Pokorny
miroslav.poko...@gmail.com wrote:
The goal was to make Android ubiquitous
Right on, Android is after market share, just like everybody
elsehttp://beust.com/weblog/2010/09/22/what-steve-jobs-really-wants/:-)
--
Cédric
--
You received this
On 9/22/10 17:49 , Cédric Beust ♔ wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Miroslav Pokorny
miroslav.poko...@gmail.com mailto:miroslav.poko...@gmail.com wrote:
The goal was to make Android ubiquitous
Right on, Android is after market share, just like everybody else
On 9/20/10 16:24 , Cédric Beust ♔ wrote:
2010/9/20 Fabrizio Giudici fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it
mailto:fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it
On 9/20/10 13:53 , Cédric Beust ♔ wrote:
There are already dozens of manufacturers/third
parties/carriers that forked Android and
i think they could join OHA (which is not owned by google) and have a
properly licensed android phone with market access and all its goodness as
long as they obey the specs. And if they do that, i cant see how google
could/would block them
2010/9/21 Fabrizio Giudici fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it
On 9/21/10 08:38 , Marcelo Fukushima wrote:
i think they could join OHA (which is not owned by google) and have a
properly licensed android phone with market access and all its
goodness as long as they obey the specs. And if they do that, i cant
see how google could/would block them
The specs
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Fabrizio Giudici
fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it wrote:
They already fragmented Java
How so?
--
Cédric
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups The
Java Posse group.
To post to this group, send email to
http://www.dzone.com/links/r/will_google_sue_facebook_for_modifying_andriod_ju.html
Another pile of shit coming?
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - We make Java work. Everywhere.
java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people
Well, I'm sure Google doesn't like their own stuff being used against them.
They are trying to be too nice perhaps letting anyone fork the system. It is
going to get very difficult to support all these devices and developers may
have to pick and choose if things go too far.
2010/9/20 Cédric
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Robert Casto casto.rob...@gmail.comwrote:
Well, I'm sure Google doesn't like their own stuff being used against them.
Against them?
Every time Android gets a new user, Google wins.
--
Cédric
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
I agree, but they might not see it that way.
I'm wondering what will happen to all these users if Google looses against
Oracle. There could be a whole lot of revenue out there for the getting if
it goes Oracle's way.
2010/9/20 Cédric Beust ♔ ced...@beust.com
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:24 PM,
On 9/20/10 14:59 , Robert Casto wrote:
I agree, but they might not see it that way.
I'm wondering what will happen to all these users if Google looses
against Oracle. There could be a whole lot of revenue out there for
the getting if it goes Oracle's way.
2010/9/20 Cédric Beust ♔
On 9/20/10 13:53 , Cédric Beust ♔ wrote:
There are already dozens of manufacturers/third parties/carriers that
forked Android and shipped products with it without ever notifying
Google about it.
Android was designed to allow that, I don't understand where all the
outrage about Facebook is
ive heard of the archos tablets http://www.archos.com/ and some chinese
knock offs
2010/9/20 Fabrizio Giudici fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it
On 9/20/10 13:53 , Cédric Beust ♔ wrote:
There are already dozens of manufacturers/third parties/carriers that
forked Android and shipped products with
2010/9/20 Fabrizio Giudici fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it
On 9/20/10 13:53 , Cédric Beust ♔ wrote:
There are already dozens of manufacturers/third parties/carriers that
forked Android and shipped products with it without ever notifying Google
about it.
Android was designed to allow that, I
I'm with you guys about not wanting to develop toward yet another fork such
as Facebook.
I am interested though in the devices from Archos. They have a 2.4 model
that is supposed to sell for under $100. The 3.2 model is selling for $150.
I'm thinking about getting them for my kids. Great way for
18 matches
Mail list logo
