That
is fuzzy logic of the week-end ;)
For
entity beans, we let the database synchronize the beans (through select ... for
update) consequently, we do not need/have a distributed cache at the application
server level. Consequently, your calls can either be redirected to S1 or S2: the
bean
On 21 Okt, Scott M Stark wrote:
I plan on doing an extension of JBossSX + JCA based on applicable
standards to provide a uniform security service for all JBoss services.
Thats great. But is this plan as in will be done spring 2002 or as in
plan I am alreaddy working on it. I need to sort of
On 22 Okt, Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21 Okt, Scott M Stark wrote:
I plan on doing an extension of JBossSX + JCA based on applicable
standards to provide a uniform security service for all JBoss services.
Thats great. But is this plan as in will be done spring 2002 or as in
plan I
Title: org.jboss.pool.ObjectPool bug?
Hi,
I played around with current org.jboss.pool package and embarked upon what I take for a bug (although it is a matter of what the desired behavior is):
In ObjecPool method runCleanupandShrink before garbage collection occurs method isCleanupEnabled
Hi Andreas,
FarmAutoDeployer and FarmAutoDeployerMBean seem to be in the wrong
package...
Luke.
--
Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd.
PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523Chttp://www.mkeym.com
___
User: kimptoc
Date: 01/10/22 03:07:01
Modified:src/stylesheets summary1a.xsl
Log:
try and make sure people don't forget how to run tests
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -1 jbosstest/src/stylesheets/summary1a.xsl
Index: summary1a.xsl
User: pra
Date: 01/10/22 03:19:33
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jms Tag: Branch_2_4
JMSContainerInvoker.java
Log:
Corrected bug in failovercode, notStoped was wrongly inited to false.
Revision ChangesPath
No
User: pra
Date: 01/10/22 03:32:50
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jms JMSContainerInvoker.java
Log:
Corrected bug in failovercode, notStoped was wrongly inited to false.
Revision ChangesPath
1.31 +2 -3
Forwading to JBoss-Dev (the spydermq list has been deprecated anyways).
JBossMQ has allready been tided down to needing the JBoss spine. So I think
this is a non issue.
The standalone version is just JBoss with only the services needed for
JBossMQ running.
Regards,
Hiram
From: Dmitri
I just looked up why JBossMQ is failing for the lubega system. Since I just
added the feature that lets an app connect to MQ without needing JNDI, I had
to pin down the port that the OIL and UIL listen to.
I picked ports 8090 and 8091. Seems like something allready has 8090 bound
on the
Yes,
but changing to commit-option Ais only coherent for read-only data.
Otherwise, two nodes may/willplay with different states (cached state
instead of recently modified state). If some reporting applications (i.e.
read-only activity) needs almost up-to-date data, you may also deploy two
I believe you are looking at 3.0 code. In the future please indicate which
version your comments apply to.
Having installed the feature you are discussing, I think it works properly.
The cleanup thread does two activities: removing connections that have
idletimed out, and removing connections
Aha, looks like I made a mistake. Thanks for the clarification. I will try
to fix this soon.
Right now, as far as I can tell, these pools are only used for the
connection pooling. Personally, I find the code kind of hard to
understand. I have been thinking of trying to simplify it so that it
The following issues apply to foreign-key-mapping ..
1) problems with unidirectional relations:
deployment does not work, because the
JDBCCMRFieldBridge.initRelatedData
does not find the related cmrField - throws DeploymentException
I just fixed a bug in this code last night, where
Bugs item #473688, was opened at 2001-10-22 08:14
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=473688group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned
Day Corp.'s 'Communiqué JSP Debugger' is a remote java/jsp debugger for
Tomcat. it's based on jpda 1.0 (java platform debugger architecture),
which is the official debugging support for the java 2 platform.
some features
-
- source-level JSP-debugging - any server, any time
- the
Hi Luke
I know but this was just a plain copy of the AutoDeployer and
only one line changed therefore I didn't wanted to polute the
deployment directory. When everthing goes fine this class will
be removed soon.
Andy
- Original Message -
From: Luke Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
The following issues apply to foreign-key-mapping ..
1) problems with unidirectional relations:
deployment does not work, because the
JDBCCMRFieldBridge.initRelatedData
does not find the related cmrField - throws DeploymentException
I just fixed a bug in this
So should I change my default?? I need to good port numbers for JBossMQ??
Scott, Any ideas??
Regards,
Hiram
From: Neale Swinnerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 13:57:31 +0100
If I
User: dmaplesden
Date: 01/10/22 13:38:51
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq/server Tag: Branch_2_4 BasicQueue.java
Log:
Backport bug fix for race condition to 2.4 branch
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.4.2.2
User: dmaplesden
Date: 01/10/22 13:39:06
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq Tag: Branch_2_4
SpyMessageConsumer.java
Log:
Backport bug fix for race condition to 2.4 branch
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
On 22 Oct 01, at 14:42, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I think, you are right .. should have read the spec more
deeply .. but
this restriction implies, that foreign keys must never have a
NOT NULL
constraint. I wonder, if that was an intended behaviour?!
Hi guys,
You can have not null
Title: JBossMQ STILL hangs
Hi
Sheng,
This
sounds like the same bug I fixed in the HEAD source code last
week.
From a
couple of things you have said (jboss.jcml file??) it sounds like you are
running from the jboss 2.4 code, probably the jboss 2.4.3 release. I have
only just backported
Well, does it?
I tink I saw references to Referenceable when I was in the JNDI code for the
clustering stuff.
Bill
Hi Geeks
As you maybe know in the autodeployer startService()
is an initial run() method call w/o using a thread. Now
I am using my own AutoDeployer for the farm member
service because I need to listen for a specific directory
instead of listening to a specific type of file extension.
But
Patches item #473775, was opened at 2001-10-22 13:11
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=473775group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.5 Rabbit Hole (unstable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Guillaume Boissiere
Title: JBossMQ STILL hangs
Ok,
just to clear Sheng's good name, there was still a bug (or actually the same bug
in a slightly different place) that should (touch wood) now be
fixed.
-Original Message-From: David Maplesden
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 23,
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 140
Successful tests: 129
Errors:5
Failures: 6
[time of test: 23 October 2001 3:17 GMT]
[java.version:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 140
Successful tests: 131
Errors:4
Failures: 5
[time of test: 23 October 2001 4:9 GMT]
[java.version:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 130
Successful tests: 121
Errors:4
Failures: 5
[time of test: 23 October 2001 5:29 GMT]
[java.version:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 140
Successful tests: 131
Errors:4
Failures: 5
[time of test: 23 October 2001 6:30 GMT]
[java.version:
31 matches
Mail list logo
