You could try using each object's toString() method and merging that with a
Velocity template at run-time. Use the MBean to associate each object with
a template. Every object already has a toString() method and a String is
already guaranteed to be serializable, so you're most of the way
Feature Requests item #475969, was opened at 2001-10-29 04:00
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=475969group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Martin Kihlgren (zond)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
User: negaton
Date: 01/10/29 05:24:33
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/verifier/strategy AbstractVerifier.java
Log:
Fix for bug #448723. Static inner classes being reported as invalid RMI/IIOP types.
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +4 -4
User: negaton
Date: 01/10/29 05:26:12
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/verifier/strategy Tag: Branch_2_4
AbstractVerifier.java
Log:
Backport of fix for bug #448723. Static inner classes not being reported as valid
RMI/IIOP types.
Revision ChangesPath
User: mnf999
Date: 01/10/29 06:53:53
Modified:src/docs/jbossgroup store.jsp
Log:
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +8 -4 newsite/src/docs/jbossgroup/store.jsp
Index: store.jsp
===
RCS file:
That wouldn't really work, because some of the objects may have a late
loading semantic.
A CMP2 bean with CMR fields for example.
If I toString()ed it, I'd
1) lose all the unique fields
2) never get CMR data
Plus, the data map is sent from the client, so it's too late once the MBean
gets it.
It has been brought to my attention that the term Web-Monkey might be
offensive to some.
Being new to the list, and trying not to piss everyone off, let me clarify.
I meant no offense by the term. In my previous company, the HTML coders
called themselves Web-Monkies (in fact, that was their
Hi-
I'm not a registered developer and probably won't ever be one (too many
projects already). But, I am doing a custom login module that can handle an
additional parameter Organization to facilitate an ASP application model. In
that model, a particular organization needs to be able to assign
please submit a patch with this. We need to start seriously keeping track
of all proposals.
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve
|Salkin
|Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:31 PM
|To: Jboss-Development
|Subject: [JBoss-dev]
Hey,
I think it would be
nice to be able to access system properties within jboss.jcml or any other MBean
XML descriptor. I think this would greatly help the
net-boot(--net-install) feature of JBoss 3.0. For example, Jetty is
packaged in a .sar in JBoss 3.0. In that sar is the MBean XML
Change Notes item #475991, was opened at 2001-10-29 05:37
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=475991group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v2.4.4
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Luke Taylor (negaton)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Patches item #476008, was opened at 2001-10-29 06:41
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=476008group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.5 Rabbit Hole (unstable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Holger Engels
Effectively any login module can add see any number of additional parameters
simply by adding the options to the module configuration and they are
available
to any subclass of the AbstractLoginModule via the options Map. If you think
what your developing adds a reusable abstraction to this post
The rendering of msgs logged is independent of the logging. There is an
XML appender that can generate an XML view of the msgs. For what your
talking about a database appender would make more sense to allow one
to query log msgs any any selectable attribute.
- Original Message -
From:
Your making sense, but for the use cases your talking about I don't agree
with the use of system properties. Rather, file paths should be relative to
a
filesystem JNDI DirContext so that both the location and implementation
of the filesystem is abstracted out. System properties also require setup
My favorite robot is still not making sense...
man you have to work on those translators
What is a revolver ?
marcf
|And then maybe use the concept of a configurable revolver size, before
|flushing to file ...
|
|/peter_f
|
|
|___
Actually I think the sar format is good for certain things, bad for others.
For example having to jar and unjar when all you want to do is change the
xml file is silly, really.
I am thinking more and more about the bare xml sar that just points to a
repository of files including the class files
Either the version in cvs or the version stuck in limbo on my machine (I
think its in cvs) lets you put a directory in your sar that is copied
literally to a known location in the local jboss tree on deployment. It
will not overwrite anything that is already there on redeployment. However
there
Sorry - revolver(=revolve=rotate) should read as (a round robin) queue or as
a fixed size spooler so the db do not grow bizarre but has auto flushing ...
the imagined db adaptor, when size indicates full, would flush to dev null
or to a file ? ...
/peter_f
expanded
(matrix =
From: Andreas Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Using system properties in jboss.jcml would help
net boot
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 14:45:32 -0800
I like the idea with the JNDI directory context. On the other hand
I entirely agree. I was thinking more that JBoss would setup a bunch of
SystemProperties based on the boot url like INSTALL_URL, DEPLOY_URL,
CONF_URL etc... that MBean configurations could use.
Yes, a JNDI DirContext may be nice, but how do you set one up? How do you
map it? (I actually
From my reading of the JCA spec this seems to be up to the ManagedConnection
implementation. Figure 9.0 OID: Connection Pool Management with new
Connection Creation
shows the ConnectionManager asking the ManagedConnection for the XAResource
that is to be
enlisted in the current transaction. The
I got an answer from someone who appeared to know what he was talking about
on the Connector Interests list-- he said that (at least for xa managed
connections) the ConnectionManager was free to use any acceptable
ManagedConnection the MCF matched. Since the xid is not part of the match
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 140
Successful tests: 129
Errors:5
Failures: 6
[time of test: 30 October 2001 3:18 GMT]
[java.version:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 140
Successful tests: 131
Errors:4
Failures: 5
[time of test: 30 October 2001 4:8 GMT]
[java.version:
User: schaefera
Date: 01/10/29 21:14:03
Modified:tomcat/src/resources/test/META-INF Tag: Branch_2_4 jboss.xml
Log:
Fixed the encoding to go along with standardjboss.xml
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 130
Successful tests: 121
Errors:4
Failures: 5
[time of test: 30 October 2001 5:28 GMT]
[java.version:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 140
Successful tests: 131
Errors:4
Failures: 5
[time of test: 30 October 2001 6:27 GMT]
[java.version:
28 matches
Mail list logo
