Hello Dain,
Besides Oracle's drivers being a crap,
for sure, yes.
the CLOB and all SQL 99 types
could use improvement. Supposedly Oracle's new 9.0.2 drivers fix most
of these problems. Fixing general Object persistence is the first think
Great.
I will be working on after I finish the
An initial draft of a JBoss 3.0 ClassLoader Architecture whitepaper
has been posted to the FAQ forum. See:
http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=67thread=15974
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Hi team,
I'm not quite sure if this is the right place for reporting this sort of thing, but
here it is:
The class org.jboos.util.Scheduler has the following invocation of the Timer mbean
addNotification method while there is no such method with that signature:
This call is made when the value
There were fixes to the scheduler in 2.4.5 so get the latest release
which is 2.4.6.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: kv [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002
Change Notes item #558189, was opened at 2002-05-20 01:21
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=558189group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.0 (Rabbit Hole)
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned to: Scott M
Hello,
While ear redeployment I get exception
InstanceAlreadyExistsException but the process of deployment continues
and finishes with the phrase: Successfully completed deployment of
package: ...
And it seems it's really deployed successfully. I haven't found it
in bug tracker. Could this
Hello!
Zero errors! Checkout of Branch_3_0 done at 2002/05/20 1h30 a.m
Uploading HTML results as I write this. HEAD tests already running too.
Duarte HappyGuy Loreto
Don't worry, be happy!
Number of tests run: 593
Sorry! Forgot to update link. Test results can be found at
http://planeta.clix.pt/happyguy/jboss_Branch_3_0/
I'm having some dificulties uploading, but it will be there soon.
Duarte HappyGuy Loreto
Don't worry, be happy!
From: Duarte Loreto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Besides being not as standards compliant as one would wish them to be,
the Oracle thin drivers have always been working like a breeze for me.
Most of the people that would be willing to pay for JBoss support will
be exactly those
who are using Oracle.
As you dig deeper into the
Hello Georg,
Besides being not as standards compliant as one would wish them to be,
the Oracle thin drivers have always been working like a breeze for me.
OK. So, do you have some information regarding CLOB in Oracle and how to
best handle them with thin drivers? This could be useful.
Scott,
This appears to be caused by a race between Jetty responding to the
request to the JSP and the testsuite undeploying it.
Looking at my request and server logs I can see that a request was made
for include_ejb.jsp during the second before the call to undeploy
jbosstest-web.ear.
It
Hi,
the code to fill the clob looks like that:
Writer outstream = clob.getCharacterOutputStream();
int i = 0;
int chunk = 10;
while (i length)
{
outstream.write(i + hello world, 0, chunk);
i += chunk;
if (length - i chunk)
chunk = (int) length
I stuck a sleep() in before the undeploy and this seems to have
worked-around the problem and thus confirmed my suspicion.
It is showing up a further problem - though not in Jetty:
13:30:14,538 INFO [EjbModule] Destroying
13:30:14,600 ERROR [Log4jService$ThrowableListenerLoggingAdapter]
Hello Georg,
Sorry but we don't speak about the same call. I was speaking about:
PreparedStatement stmt = ...
...
stmt.setCharacterStream (columnId, new StringReader (myBigString),
myBigString.length)
...
With JAWS, we don't cache the CLOB object we receive when
Bugs item #550819, was opened at 2002-04-30 17:36
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=550819group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke)
I was trying to read through the postings regarding njar. It sounded like
a lot of work and is an impressive technical achievement, but like Mark, I
believe KISS is good. Further, it goes against speed and efficiency. Disk
space is cheap. Memory is faster than disk is faster than
Patches item #558307, was opened at 2002-05-20 08:03
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=558307group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dan Bunker (danbunker)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #556287, was opened at 2002-05-15 03:38
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=556287group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stéphane Bidoul (sbidoul)
The tests are at least reading the reply headers so maybe it is a race
between finishing writing the body. I'll make sure the testsuite does
read the complete reply and if that does not fix it reopen the subject.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Sacha Labourey wrote:
Hello Georg,
Sorry but we don't speak about the same call. I was speaking about:
PreparedStatement stmt = ...
...
stmt.setCharacterStream (columnId, new StringReader (myBigString),
myBigString.length)
...
With JAWS, we don't cache the
Georg,
I agree with David on this. The proper place to do this type of
optimizations is in the JCA wrapper. My goal moving to 4.0 is to try to
make the CMP engine more generic to the point where it can persist to
any JCA connection. At the same time we would introduce DB specific JCA
Ricardo Argüello wrote:
Dain,
I read in the JBoss forums that unknown primary key will be supported next month.
That's the plan.
Is it going to be supported with the help of jboss specific metadata, or as the spec
says (PK of type Object)?
Yes, to both. The Object type pk will turn
I'm using 2.4.5/jetty4 final release (dated 2002-05-10) and I'm still getting this
problem. I get it on sfsb passivation, however.
Testcase can be supplied on demand (the forums don't want to upload the attachment,
and since the bug is closed sf won't accept attachments): 2 stateful beans, one
Create a new bug with the testcase as this is a different scenario.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Chris Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:15 AM
Did you actually look at the njar code? It is extremely short and simple
and I think would answer most of your questions. Essentially it hides and
caches unpacking a nested jar.
Aside from registering the njar handler, I don't think we are doing
anything special to make multiply nested njar
Bugs item #558362, was opened at 2002-05-20 17:37
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=558362group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Chris Harris (charris)
Assigned to:
Cheers, Scott,
Jules
Scott M Stark wrote:
The tests are at least reading the reply headers so maybe it is a race
between finishing writing the body. I'll make sure the testsuite does
read the complete reply and if that does not fix it reopen the subject.
Scott
Bugs item #554577, was opened at 2002-05-10 09:29
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=554577group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Wendell Nichols (wcn00)
Bugs item #551419, was opened at 2002-05-02 07:12
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=551419group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Richard Robinson (robinsonra)
Bugs item #554577, was opened at 2002-05-10 09:29
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=554577group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Wendell Nichols (wcn00)
Bugs item #554577, was opened at 2002-05-10 09:29
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=554577group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Wendell Nichols (wcn00)
Bugs item #511461, was opened at 2002-01-31 14:50
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=511461group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Åsmund Hjulstad (ahjulsta)
Bugs item #511461, was opened at 2002-01-31 14:50
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=511461group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Åsmund Hjulstad (ahjulsta)
Bugs item #549775, was opened at 2002-04-28 05:13
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=549775group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to:
Number of tests run: 593
Successful tests: 593
Errors:0
Failures: 0
[time of test: 20 May 2002 11:3 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[I moved this to the dev list]
I think the real power of JMX is you can have disparate components that
can all talk to a central object without becoming tightly coupled.
Here is my idea:
We have an optional port server MBean. Before a service opens a port it
checks for the existence of the
OK - that's not so bad. I can interface Jetty to it - no problem.
I'm still a little concerned about this centralisation creeping
outwards. Are ports the only resource over which different instances of
JBoss running on the same box are likely to collide ?
We should also bear in mind that
Jules Gosnell wrote:
OK - that's not so bad. I can interface Jetty to it - no problem.
Well that's one vote. We'll have to wait to see if everyone else agrees.
I'm still a little concerned about this centralisation creeping
outwards. Are ports the only resource over which different
A port is not sufficient. This needs to provide the complete mapping
of {int port, InetAddress ifAddress} with at least the possibility of
inputing:
- service name
- virtual hostname
- int defaultPort
- InetAddress defaultAddress
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
Scott M Stark wrote:
A port is not sufficient. This needs to provide the complete mapping
of {int port, InetAddress ifAddress} with at least the possibility of
inputing:
- service name
- virtual hostname
- int defaultPort
- InetAddress defaultAddress
Sure. Then we have the
I had been working on an alternative solution to this problem (see earlier thread in
Mid-April: Multiple Instances). After some thought and work, this (Dain's) seems
more robust (at least to me). The other way was effectively a proxy server sitting on
a single (known) port, directing streams
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
OK - that's not so bad. I can interface Jetty to it - no problem.
Well that's one vote. We'll have to wait to see if everyone else agrees.
I'm still a little concerned about this centralisation creeping
outwards. Are ports the only
OK, given the title of this thread, am I the only one who's featuring a
bunch of people developing J2EE programs on vt100 terminals? OK, that's
a bit ridiculous - XTerms I suppose anyway.
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
OK - that's not so bad. I can interface Jetty to it - no
I will *gladly* volunteer to help out. I know the network stuff pretty well, and with
a little help here and there (with the JBoss internal stuff) can put together a
solution. Let me know what I can do.
#mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
No, the signature has to be at least:
{int, InetAddress} getPort(String serviceName, String hostName,
int defaultPort, InetAddress defaultAddress);
The address on which to bind the port is also a mappable property.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
MainDeployer.getDeployment(URL) is a managed operation returning the
DeploymentInfo for the deployed package at URL. DeploymentInfo.localCl is
a classloader that will give you only the stuff in the deployed package: it
is designed for reading resources out of it, and nothing else.
david jencks
Cool.
I suggest you start by coding the simplest thing possible; like just
give ports in serial order in a range (like DHCP does), as a proof of
concept. You can make it much more interesting later. This will allow
the people who write the other services to add calls to your interface.
Mike Finn wrote:
I had been working on an alternative solution to this problem (see earlier thread in
Mid-April: Multiple Instances). After some thought and work, this (Dain's) seems
more robust (at least to me). The other way was effectively a proxy server sitting on
a single (known) port,
Mike Finn wrote:
I had been working on an alternative solution to this problem (see
earlier thread in Mid-April: Multiple Instances). After some
thought and work, this (Dain's) seems more robust (at least to me).
The other way was effectively a proxy server sitting on a single
Hi,
I haven´t had much luck in the users mailing list and am hoping that I may
get a response here.
I´ve got a stateless session bean doing a jndi lookup on my entity bean and
returning an array of objects. The problem is that the first time I start
the application everything works fine and I
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Mike Finn wrote:
Don't know. I would say that the client would need to configure it by
hand. This is what you do when you have many developers working on a
web app. I know that my server port is 8098.
Right, but you don't get that if you hand them out in
- Original Message -
From: Mike Finn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 12:25 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss in a multi developers
environment
Q 1) I assume service name would be the JBoss service name? (jmx-html,
webserver, etc). IP
Dan Christopherson wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Mike Finn wrote:
Don't know. I would say that the client would need to configure it by
hand. This is what you do when you have many developers working on a
web app. I know that my server port is 8098.
Right, but you don't get
Yes, this is what I am talking about in terms of the server identity
being presented as part of the request to allow the starksm config
to always bind the http service on 8080 so I can use the default
config. Dain has to go and change his config in order for him to
talk to his dsundstrom config
Scott M Stark wrote:
There are at least these attributes that should go into the request
object say ServiceBinding:
Much better name.
// The service JMX name
String jmxName;
// The virtualHost the service wants to bind to which may be null
String virtualHost;
// The name of the JBoss
There are at least these attributes that should go into the request
object say ServiceBinding:
// The service JMX name
String jmxName;
// The virtualHost the service wants to bind to which may be null
String virtualHost;
// The name of the JBoss service instance to support always giving an
Bugs item #558434, was opened at 2002-05-20 20:37
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=558434group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ignacio Coloma (alu1344)
Assigned to:
Yes. We are aware of this problem, it should have no effect on your
application. It should be fixed shortly.
--jason
On Monday 20 May 2002 09:00 am, Alex Loubyansky wrote:
Hello,
While ear redeployment I get exception
InstanceAlreadyExistsException but the process of deployment
// The service JMX name
String jmxName;
// The virtualHost the service wants to bind to which may be null
String virtualHost;
// The name of the JBoss service instance to support always giving an
// instance the same values
String serverName;
I'm lost. What is this? Can you give
Bugs item #558434, was opened at 2002-05-20 16:37
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=558434group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ignacio Coloma (alu1344)
Assigned
Why isn't JBossMQ on the Best JMS category?
Sacha Labourey wrote:
You love JBoss?
It is time for you to say it!
http://www.sys-con.com/java/readerschoice2002/nominationform.cfm
Vote for JBoss as the JDJ Best App-Server
___
Good point. We don't know how the list of nominees has been built. JBoss
could have been registered in more than one category, for sure.
Cheers,
Sacha
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
Ignacio Coloma
Envoye
mbean code=...ServiceBindingMgr name=...,service=ServiceBindingMgr
...
ServerNamestarksm/ServerName
/mbean
while for your instance he adds:
mbean code=...ServiceBindingMgr name=...,service=ServiceBindingMgr
...
ServerNamedsundstrom/ServerName
/mbean
Now there can be a
everyone
1- go and vote
2- go and bitch (about the categories)
let's make some noise, I can ***NOT** believe that Oracle would have 1600
votes, (!) just an email in the company saying go vote or I fire your ass
and all 1600 employees of the java division went there 2 weeks ago (all at
once)
And how does it autogenerate the URLs I enter into my browser, the
config file for my firewall to allow the RMI ports through, the config
file for my proxy server, etc. Allowing for static bindings does not
preclude the possibility of dynamic bindings, but we need to start
there and support it.
Anatoly Akkerman wrote:
mbean code=...ServiceBindingMgr name=...,service=ServiceBindingMgr
...
ServerNamestarksm/ServerName
/mbean
while for your instance he adds:
mbean code=...ServiceBindingMgr name=...,service=ServiceBindingMgr
...
ServerNamedsundstrom/ServerName
/mbean
Now
Mu, ham. =)
-dain
marc fleury wrote:
everyone
1- go and vote
2- go and bitch (about the categories)
let's make some noise, I can ***NOT** believe that Oracle would have 1600
votes, (!) just an email in the company saying go vote or I fire your ass
and all 1600 employees of the
Not a problem. Hopefully this email will contain the requested
info. BTW, I'm not even sure I was asking for a new
ClassLoader. I saw a significant amount of code in
MBeanServerImpl.invoke() and ServiceCreator.install() that seemed to
imply that the intention was to have a ClassLoader for each
Mike,
I talked with Jason and he said the best module for this code would be
jboss/server and a package of org.jboss.service.portmap. I think
servicebinding would be a better package.
Anyway, post a patch when you get a simple mapper working.
-dain
Mike Finn wrote:
I will *gladly*
Then put into org.jboss.service.binding then... I don't really care (at the
moment).
--jason
Quoting Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mike,
I talked with Jason and he said the best module for this code would be
jboss/server and a package of org.jboss.service.portmap. I think
¤»¤d¤»¦Ê¸Uµ§¥þ¥@¬É³Ì·sEmail¦W³æ
§Ú¦³¤»¤d¤»¦Ê¸Uµ§¥þ¥@¬É³Ì·sEmail¦W³æ¡A
§A¥i¥H¦bªá¶O·¥¤Öªº±¡§Î¤U¡A±µÄ²¨ì¥þ¥@¬É¤»¤d¤»¦Ê¸U¤H¡I
³o¨Ç³£¬O³Ì·sªº¦a§}¡A¬O§Ú¦bºô¸ô¤W¡A¦³¨t²Î¦a¦¬¶°¤U¨Óªº¡A
¸g¹L³nÅé´ú¸Õ¡A¥u«O¯d¦³®Ä¦a§}¡A¨ÃºÉ¶q§â¤£Ä@¦¬«HªÌ±Æ°£¡C
Number of tests run: 729
Successful tests: 568
Errors:156
Failures: 5
[time of test: 21 May 2002 0:55 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.0
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Number of tests run: 736
Successful tests: 576
Errors:155
Failures: 5
[time of test: 21 May 2002 1:55 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.0
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Hi
Yes, this was a problem and was fixed in 2.4.5 as Scott
already said.
But you fix won't work either because you added a period
which is not correct because this is the initial call (one time
call) only to be there to cause one notification. Later one this
will be used to recalculate the
Dain wrote:
ServicePort contains a hostName, port, and InetAddress.
Doesn't InetAddress contain the hostName?
-Phil
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas --
Number of tests run: 736
Successful tests: 576
Errors:156
Failures: 4
[time of test: 21 May 2002 3:1 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Using a resource name of
"file:/META-INF/database.xml" does not make sense
as this is asking for the file located at the
absolute path /META-INF/database.xml.
I created a test of loading a resource from a
service start and parsing the resulting
xml doc using a contruct like:
URL url0 =
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Ok, but such a request is not going to come from the service. Rather
there might need to be multiple bindAddress values in the ServiceBinding
returned by the mapper. Maybe the config file specified an interface
name or maybe must mutiple addresses.
- Original Message -
From: Dain
82 matches
Mail list logo
